Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Classic Tomlin. Pathetic conservative coaching and only has a job because he keeps a decent defense around every year and wins 8-10 games. For Pittsburgh Steelers football, this is the minimum expectation. |
HabsHater88 | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Road favs in the NFL are 34-8 this season. I cannot win under these circumstances. Carry on. According to covers.com, away favorites are 51-38-5. Can you clarify your statement? |
vanzack | 214 |
|
|
Let¡¯s score the touchdown as fast as possible to give the kicker with the biggest leg in football time to get in range¡ The brain dead coaching never ends.. |
brn2loslive2win | 6 |
|
|
@vanzack Unlike yourself, I have stopped posting my plays this year. Also having a losing season and also refusing to play 70-80% favorites like I probably should. Even though it¡¯s a money maker, it¡¯s something that would go against everything that I work at and believe is the best way for me. My point is this- it takes a really genuine individual to come out every week without fail and post plays that are consistently losing, all for the sake of being honest. To those of us who have followed you for years, you have gained another level of respect for continuing to be honest and by not wavering from what you believe is the way to be successful. You could have simply disappeared for the season or said that you were taking a break to reevaluate. You never did. You keep grinding. Thank you for continually posting your plays, giving advice, and sticking around here for guys like myself who are looking to learn and improve. P.S.- You could always lay it all on a 10 team SGP and win all of your money back plus some. Apparently all of my buddies do it on a regular basis, while laughing at my losing picks. Just can¡¯t figure out why none of them own a mansion yet¡ |
vanzack | 214 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CaridadDelCobre:
You all are crazy with the Cleveland nonsense! Cincy might be the best bet on the board. They will score 31+ easy and you expect DTR to hang with that in his first start of the season with a team that has been so pathetic and has nothing to play for? The two dogs to bet are: Washington +3.5 (great spot here), and the NY Jets +3 (they play close games, are def not as bad as their record suggests, have been playing well). Also like the Pats to cover +14 in a game that Buffalo doesn't need and will keep it vanilla get in and get out without injuries. They can't catch the Chiefs now. Easily the best post in this thread. The only issue is that I have a feeling that none of those games will go this way. Cincy will find a way to keep Cleveland hanging around, Buffalo will beat the patriots by 3 scores, and Philly will win by 7+. Still, betting the favorites will make you the most money this year. If you want to try your money on a dog this week, it¡¯s titans, giants, and panthers. wouldn¡¯t be surprised if all three win outright. |
DvsRob | 33 |
|
|
Here¡¯s a question for you guys- where do the odds go if the Vikings lose out? It could happen. If they slip up against Seattle, this is a very realistic possibility. A finishing stretch like that knocks KOC out of the conversation if you ask me. Here¡¯s a wild prediction for ya- Steelers lose out, Tomlin is completely out of the conversation. Vikings, same. KOC out. Detroit takes division, Campbell shoots to the top as the favorite. Buffalo wins out and McDermott HAS to be one of the shortest shots on the board. (My pick to win it) From there I go to Sirianni who I can¡¯t stand. I don¡¯t think the voters would do it but, He has to be up there if they get to 15 wins.
And finally Matt Lafleur who deserves to be in the same conversation with the top two as it appears that the Packers are playing their best ball of the year when it counts the most. Andy is out with too many lucky wins. Not to mention he¡¯s coming off b2b Super Bowls. His division championship and high win total isn¡¯t seen as a major accomplishment, but rather the threshold for his team. Thats my take!
|
Hiok1553 | 61 |
|
|
@vanzack If you were able to come back from this years deficit and break even, or be up or down just a few units, that would be just as impressive as some of your winning seasons in my opinion. Not only do I believe that you can do it, but it wouldn¡¯t surprise me at all. Keep grinding and GL tonight. Thanks for sticking around the circus |
vanzack | 121 |
|
|
@undermysac Pro money loves Indy and I don¡¯t get it either. Richardson is a horrible quarterback imo. Naturally sharp money likes the dog in many cases but this year has been different. I think taking Indy means expecting an excellent performance by Indy¡¯s defense, which may happen. But, it may only take 17 Denver points to cover the number.
|
undermysac | 41 |
|
|
@brn2loslive2win Just to clarify on my last post- I¡¯m referring to a scenario where one leg is a push and the other is a win on it¡¯s own alternate line. |
jowchoo | 42 |
|
|
@Knollywood100
@undermysac The push=loss on a teaser is a thing of the past. Anyone who is betting at a book that does this should stop immediately. The book that I use doesn¡¯t even use the word teaser anywhere on the app/kiosk. They are called alternate line parlays and if one leg is a push, the other leg gets graded as a win and gets paid out at its own odds. Just my advice. |
jowchoo | 42 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Over 61% on 553 plays. If I can bring home my HOUSTON futures = my best year in the last 6 Another winning week. As I¡¯ve said before, this is hands down the most impressive thing happening on covers right now. I¡¯m waiting on Houston division winner myself. I said before the season that I thought it was the best bet of the year at +110 or +105. If it cashes it might actually be the best bet I¡¯ve made in my life. Looking good so far. |
jowchoo | 42 |
|
|
@Macwestie1 Nice week Mac. |
Macwestie1 | 30 |
|
|
@vanzack Nice job vz good to see you put a couple of good weeks together. Bol going forward. |
vanzack | 41 |
|
|
@leventis72 When the trolls start coming out you know you¡¯re doing good |
leventis72 | 160 |
|
|
@Raiders22 Raiders |
Raiders22 | 11 |
|
|
Ytd: -5.05u 3u Buf -3.5 -110 3u LAC +4 -110 1u ATL +6 -110 1u SF -3 -110 1u Sea +3 -110 1u Phi -13.5 -110 .5u LV +6.5 -110
|
brn2loslive2win | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jackie_Daytona:
@brn2loslive2win Yah its all same game teasers. I dont mix and match games Congrats on a winning record. Same game teasers are the hardest to hit. |
Jackie_Daytona | 15 |
|
|
@jowchoo How about 63-0 this week? |
jowchoo | 42 |
|
|
@Jackie_Daytona Nice work. Like them all. Only question is do you play all of your teasers within the same game? As in side/total? |
Jackie_Daytona | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Buffalobob89074:
If Hurts and Barkley were injured (not an impossibility) then that wager might spell doom. We have all seen some unlikely things go down, little David slays Goliath. This is exactly why laying those odds is insanity. Hurts could get sacked and wack his head and be forced to leave the game. Now the backup qb is in facing a (not great, but) nfl defense made up of professionals. Could easily go south quickly. Not to mention the ¡°Any given Sunday¡± factor. Maybe Philly comes out flat on offense and goes down 7-0 early. Next possession is a sack fumble for 6. Now you¡¯re down 14 and playing catch up. At that point it doesn¡¯t matter who you¡¯re playing, the odds are against you. Good luck to that guy, but that type of gambling is a little expensive for my taste. |
begginerboy | 54 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.