Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Luv2Win06:
Toss up. I like NIU under 21.5 The fact that this dude is on this makes me like my Northern Ill -3 even more, and now I'm tempted to slam the TT over... Check out his Coastal Carolina thread... |
Lantz54 | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Luv2Win06:
Final plays CC +13 Under 56 Amador under 57.5 receiving yards Bennett over 71.5 rushing yards Brandon high under 70.5 rushing yards
Where you at Luv2Win06??? Halfway thru the 3rd Q and three of your bets are already dead. You gonna come back and own your stupidity? Game should be 40-0 if UTSA had a TE and a DB with any hands....
|
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Nedtan:
My case for CC winning outright - CC treating this game as a try out for next year, play better than expected - UTSA bad pass defense lets up points - UTSA offense lays an egg, multiple turnovers |
Nedtan | 8 |
|
|
@JUSTWINBABY61 See...I CAN get down with these reasons. These are fair and logical. His are not. |
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
There is NO logical case to be made for CC. This should be a boat race. I am HEAVY on UTSA spread. That said, it is college football, and the juice is too high. Not worth it... |
Nedtan | 8 |
|
|
Ya because its -450... |
Nedtan | 8 |
|
|
@WahooS Yah you got in my head here...gonna add UTSA TT Over too. GL! |
CaridadDelCobre | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Luv2Win06:
Florida beats Tulane by 20+ 55% of time so -9.5 was a lock. With this theory what makes you think -13 is a lock? seems like a 35% chance utsa covers so if they cover then I guess you got “lucky” sir
This dumbass.... Yah I rode Florida hard too. BECAUSE Mensah was out. So NO, you dummy, Florida does not cover that spread against Tulane only 55% of the time with THOSE players on the field you. You are thick dude. |
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
@Luv2Win06 LMAO stupid reason #4. The hits keep coming. You are using stats that assume the teams are comprised the same as during the regular season. UTSA wasn't playing literal third stringers and walk-ons in the rest of their games this season... |
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
Anything can happen but your REASONS for backing this team are fckin stupid. Blind squirrels can still fins nuts...so I'm not gonna say you won't cover. Ways you cover: The backup QB for Coastal balls the F out (which would be a surprise, but possible) Turnovers or Special Teams wackiness NOT the reasons you list. So I'm saying it's gambling, it's college sports, anything can happen. And I typically respect the opinions of those on the other side, but your opinions are based off of FLUFF. There is nothing evidence based or logical behind the reasons for backing this team. If they win it will be an anomaly is what I'm saying...not because CC plays ball control on offense, keeps it away and grinds the clock away. That's stupid dawg.
|
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
@Luv2Win06 Every reason you give is worse than the next. "UTSA won't blow them out" (They have scored 40+ in 4 outa last 5 games with the exception vs Army ball control team "Run the ball keep it away from UTSA" (UTSA strength is run D) "Coastal Carolina is home" (It is the day before Xmas eve, no one gonna be there to support the home team, and the players are gonna be bummed and flat because they had to stay home for a bowl) You MAY hit this bet, but if you do it will be an anomalous event. You don't even understand any of the circumstances in this game yet you are just blindly saying canned phrases. Just admit, you saw two 6-6 teams and one was getting 13 points so you took it and crossed your fingers... |
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
They have been hanging 40 and 50 points on people left and right but you don't think they will vs third stringers? |
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
100. with you. good analysis. |
Griswold1 | 22 |
|
|
Im just curious what in the hell would make you bet on this team in this spot? Not shtting on it...I am just heavy on the other side and can't find a single reason to support cc |
Luv2Win06 | 41 |
|
|
UTSA -11 and OVER 56 (single bets, not parlay)
11 am game, both teams are ravaged by the portal...seems like a hard pass? I don't think so. UTSA's QB McCown (yes that McCown family) is figuring to play and he is the real deal. After a very slow start, UTSA has been CLICKING on offense, putting up 40 burgers like its nothing. Coastal Carolina's top 2 QB are out, so they turn to a freshman who seemingly has a high profile and resume, yet 0 snaps in college. Huge QB edge there. Coastal has THE MOST portal transfers of any team this bowl season - upwards of 30. Key starters on Defense will be missing. Also this game is a home game for CC which is NOT a plus for a bowl game. Total letdown to not get to travel for a bowl. This team is gonna be flat. I think UTSA scores 40+ and might hit the Over themselves, I'm also playing the Over as UTSA defense is pretty porous and will likely give up at least a few TDs. At least one of these two bets should cash with a good likelihood that both do.
|
CaridadDelCobre | 5 |
|
|
@unplucked_gem Dear God, please delete your bookie's number. Jameis was benched like 6 days ago |
AJ86 | 20 |
|
|
This is an ABSURD take |
DvsRob | 21 |
|
|
5 favs - asking for trouble. Dump the Rams and Eagles. |
tahoejoe2 | 13 |
|
|
Cincy is the best bet on the board this week. Boat race. |
AJ86 | 20 |
|
|
You all are crazy with the Cleveland nonsense! Cincy might be the best bet on the board. They will score 31+ easy and you expect DTR to hang with that in his first start of the season with a team that has been so pathetic and has nothing to play for? The two dogs to bet are: Washington +3.5 (great spot here), and the NY Jets +3 (they play close games, are def not as bad as their record suggests, have been playing well). Also like the Pats to cover +14 in a game that Buffalo doesn't need and will keep it vanilla get in and get out without injuries. They can't catch the Chiefs now. |
DvsRob | 33 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.