@tvigilante2020
This is very much the reason why this system isn't created for everyone.
@tvigilante2020
Hey Froggy, in your database, what are the spreads that have the high hit % when betting on quarters?
It doesn't work like that, but you can look over the analysis. I updated the same google sheet.
@tvigilante2020
Hey Froggy, in your database, what are the spreads that have the high hit % when betting on quarters?
It doesn't work like that, but you can look over the analysis. I updated the same google sheet.
@tvigilante2020
I¡¯ve been collecting data for several years. The data was scraped off of several site like sportbookreview, team ranking, and even covers.
@tvigilante2020
I¡¯ve been collecting data for several years. The data was scraped off of several site like sportbookreview, team ranking, and even covers.
I'm watchin, Froggy. Very interesting. My dad taught this system to me and called it the 'Eff up, double up'. Ive always been intrigued by it but have yet to find the trends that could make it reliable. The trends are there somewhere, though. Cool stuff.
I'm watchin, Froggy. Very interesting. My dad taught this system to me and called it the 'Eff up, double up'. Ive always been intrigued by it but have yet to find the trends that could make it reliable. The trends are there somewhere, though. Cool stuff.
I think I fucked up.
I was looking at all of my data, and it seems that I collected the odds incorrectly from several sites. After I cleaned a ton of it up... well fuck! . I may be sidelined for a bit... but something else happened.
I have absolutely no idea how this could be even feasible, but using the same picking method as the quarter method, I was running a full-gate ATS analysis on the side, and it's showing a 83.697% win rate!! I have never heard of anyone having a hit rate that high consistently over several years. I'm going to make sure this isn't some weird fluke in the sheet, but if it isn't... well, forget the martingale. I'll absolutely run the full game ATS model.
In the meantime, I apologize for putting you guys at risk, and I'm just glad I found the bug now rather than later. I'll be back.
I think I fucked up.
I was looking at all of my data, and it seems that I collected the odds incorrectly from several sites. After I cleaned a ton of it up... well fuck! . I may be sidelined for a bit... but something else happened.
I have absolutely no idea how this could be even feasible, but using the same picking method as the quarter method, I was running a full-gate ATS analysis on the side, and it's showing a 83.697% win rate!! I have never heard of anyone having a hit rate that high consistently over several years. I'm going to make sure this isn't some weird fluke in the sheet, but if it isn't... well, forget the martingale. I'll absolutely run the full game ATS model.
In the meantime, I apologize for putting you guys at risk, and I'm just glad I found the bug now rather than later. I'll be back.
@Doc_Holliday
And it may still be viable, but when the data changes, so must the metrics on what a good system looks like. I need to tweak the gauges so that I weed out the outliers and block any potential sweeps. For example, if I allowed low quality teams back into the model, sure, in the long run the model is still profitable, but there will be more sweeps. So, imagine you get swept twice in a row before we go on a 100 win run. Those first 2 will hurt like hell, and you wouldn¡¯t want to continue.
@Doc_Holliday
And it may still be viable, but when the data changes, so must the metrics on what a good system looks like. I need to tweak the gauges so that I weed out the outliers and block any potential sweeps. For example, if I allowed low quality teams back into the model, sure, in the long run the model is still profitable, but there will be more sweeps. So, imagine you get swept twice in a row before we go on a 100 win run. Those first 2 will hurt like hell, and you wouldn¡¯t want to continue.
I figured out how I jacked up my data. It's super clean, and working. No ATS strategy... odds were somehow flipped between home and away. It's all good now. We move forward with the quarter method.
I figured out how I jacked up my data. It's super clean, and working. No ATS strategy... odds were somehow flipped between home and away. It's all good now. We move forward with the quarter method.
Sorry, guys. When I finally finished updating all my data, there was only a minute left before game time. I apologize. The data did change a bit, so I'll continue to work on it, but tonight's match was a solid pick. I wish I had it out there sooner.
Sorry, guys. When I finally finished updating all my data, there was only a minute left before game time. I apologize. The data did change a bit, so I'll continue to work on it, but tonight's match was a solid pick. I wish I had it out there sooner.
Alright. We're back in business. The full game ATS strategy resulting in 80%+ was the result of a gross miscalculation. It didn't make sense to me to begin with. I think of myself as fairly intelligent, but an 80%+ ATS strategy is something only a corrupted referee can pull off. So, we're back to the quarter method, but in a much more confident state of mind knowing that the data did not alter my belief in the system. Without further ado...
Record:
5 - 0
Clean Sweeps:
11/23/2024 - Philadelphia 76ers
11/25/2024 - Denver Nuggets
Today's Quarter Method Picks
Last night's call was on time, but too close to game time. So today, I make up for it with 2 picks:
Portland Trail Blazers (system expects 1Q ~ +3.5)
Brooklyn Nets (system expects 1Q ~ +3.0)
Two meals before turkey day! BOL to everyone who chooses to tail.
Reminder: Always wait for Rotowire to confirm the lineup. If 2 or more significant players are sidelined, it nullifies the pick.
Alright. We're back in business. The full game ATS strategy resulting in 80%+ was the result of a gross miscalculation. It didn't make sense to me to begin with. I think of myself as fairly intelligent, but an 80%+ ATS strategy is something only a corrupted referee can pull off. So, we're back to the quarter method, but in a much more confident state of mind knowing that the data did not alter my belief in the system. Without further ado...
Record:
5 - 0
Clean Sweeps:
11/23/2024 - Philadelphia 76ers
11/25/2024 - Denver Nuggets
Today's Quarter Method Picks
Last night's call was on time, but too close to game time. So today, I make up for it with 2 picks:
Portland Trail Blazers (system expects 1Q ~ +3.5)
Brooklyn Nets (system expects 1Q ~ +3.0)
Two meals before turkey day! BOL to everyone who chooses to tail.
Reminder: Always wait for Rotowire to confirm the lineup. If 2 or more significant players are sidelined, it nullifies the pick.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.