@fubah2
Putin is no more a terrorist than Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Barrack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, or George H.W. Bush. This isn't a comic book.
@fubah2
Putin is no more a terrorist than Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Barrack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, or George H.W. Bush. This isn't a comic book.
@fubah2
Putin is no more a terrorist than Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Barrack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, or George H.W. Bush. This isn't a comic book.
@Europa
Obviously, Sweden and Finland don't believe it! Both countries, which were neutral for decades, applied for the NATO membership shortly after the Russia invasion of Ukraine in Feb. of 2022. With both Finland and Sweden accessions, NATO now is getting stronger than ever. The Finns and Swedes feel more secured and protected by the NATO alliance, Fubah.
@Europa
Yes, good point!
NEVER believe the word of an international terrorist like Putin! That would be stupid on the grandest scale.
@Europa
Obviously, Sweden and Finland don't believe it! Both countries, which were neutral for decades, applied for the NATO membership shortly after the Russia invasion of Ukraine in Feb. of 2022. With both Finland and Sweden accessions, NATO now is getting stronger than ever. The Finns and Swedes feel more secured and protected by the NATO alliance, Fubah.
@Europa
Yes, good point!
NEVER believe the word of an international terrorist like Putin! That would be stupid on the grandest scale.
@Europa
It's a quite possible scenario, I think NATO will jump in to assist Ukraine in case Trump pulls off US financial and military aide from Ukraine
I see nothing has been learned these past few years on how NATO works. Let me help educate you guys again for a second.
Ukraine is not part of NATO. They will not get "NATO assistance" without the OK from the great US of A. The only reason they get assistance now is due to the current NEOCON regime within America allowing this to happen.
What happens when Trump is the sayer of this US assistance? If Trump "pulls US financial and military aid from Ukraine, how is NATO going to "jump in" with their forces when they don't have the OK from the Country that gives the OK, which is US.
You see where this argument of it being "a plausible scenario" completely falls apart here right ??
I told you guys 2 years ago what was going to happen and it ended with Russia pulling out, keeping the Eastern claimed portions of Ukraine essentially creating an eastern buffer zone between Urkaine and Russia. That is still what you should expect.
There is no "Russia advancing into Europe via WWII". That is a fools gold fear mongering prognostication and now that we are booting the American last NEOCON foreign policy regime you will see. Just add this to my laundry list of receipts around this cesspool.
@Europa
It's a quite possible scenario, I think NATO will jump in to assist Ukraine in case Trump pulls off US financial and military aide from Ukraine
I see nothing has been learned these past few years on how NATO works. Let me help educate you guys again for a second.
Ukraine is not part of NATO. They will not get "NATO assistance" without the OK from the great US of A. The only reason they get assistance now is due to the current NEOCON regime within America allowing this to happen.
What happens when Trump is the sayer of this US assistance? If Trump "pulls US financial and military aid from Ukraine, how is NATO going to "jump in" with their forces when they don't have the OK from the Country that gives the OK, which is US.
You see where this argument of it being "a plausible scenario" completely falls apart here right ??
I told you guys 2 years ago what was going to happen and it ended with Russia pulling out, keeping the Eastern claimed portions of Ukraine essentially creating an eastern buffer zone between Urkaine and Russia. That is still what you should expect.
There is no "Russia advancing into Europe via WWII". That is a fools gold fear mongering prognostication and now that we are booting the American last NEOCON foreign policy regime you will see. Just add this to my laundry list of receipts around this cesspool.
International conflict now...
International conflict now...
Yes. There must be a crucial reason for two countries, Finland and Sweden. Both of the countries have stayed neutral for decades and then joined the NATO if Finland and Sweden think Putin will stop his aggressions after Russia only takes Crimea and Ukraine's Eastern Oblast region. Putin thought his military would easily grab the whole Ukraine territory short after the Feb. 24, 2022 invasion. Remember the Bucha massacre? Russia intended to seize Kyiv from north but failed, not only the Eastern Oblasts. Russia wants them all.
Yes. There must be a crucial reason for two countries, Finland and Sweden. Both of the countries have stayed neutral for decades and then joined the NATO if Finland and Sweden think Putin will stop his aggressions after Russia only takes Crimea and Ukraine's Eastern Oblast region. Putin thought his military would easily grab the whole Ukraine territory short after the Feb. 24, 2022 invasion. Remember the Bucha massacre? Russia intended to seize Kyiv from north but failed, not only the Eastern Oblasts. Russia wants them all.
@Europa
Yep! PROOF of their real intent. Only a fool doesn't see it.
@Europa
Yep! PROOF of their real intent. Only a fool doesn't see it.
Thanks, Europa! Have a great day today.
GO RAMS!
Thanks, Europa! Have a great day today.
GO RAMS!
:35 second mark of this video will help explain all you need to know about the relationship between the USA and the United Nations
https://x.com/SKTheKingYT/status/1855760665685688368
:35 second mark of this video will help explain all you need to know about the relationship between the USA and the United Nations
https://x.com/SKTheKingYT/status/1855760665685688368
@kcblitzkrieg
"ended with Russia pulling out, keeping the Eastern claimed portions of Ukraine essentially creating an eastern buffer zone between Urkaine and Russia."
Which is exactly what they wanted all along with "the west" narrowing the buffer by placating Ukraine.
It never was global ambition vs. No choice once they seriously pushed Ukraine into NATO.
This nonsense will end very shortly after January.
@kcblitzkrieg
"ended with Russia pulling out, keeping the Eastern claimed portions of Ukraine essentially creating an eastern buffer zone between Urkaine and Russia."
Which is exactly what they wanted all along with "the west" narrowing the buffer by placating Ukraine.
It never was global ambition vs. No choice once they seriously pushed Ukraine into NATO.
This nonsense will end very shortly after January.
Indeed what could go wrong...especially since the fmr.diminutive comedian has gotten ballsy and just now threatened Russia announcing "Missiles will speak for themselves."
Indeed what could go wrong...especially since the fmr.diminutive comedian has gotten ballsy and just now threatened Russia announcing "Missiles will speak for themselves."
Tass news service.
¡¯The Russian Federation retains the right to use nuclear weapons in the case of aggression using conventional weapons against it¡¯ that poses a critical threat to sovereignty or territorial integrity.
Tass news service.
¡¯The Russian Federation retains the right to use nuclear weapons in the case of aggression using conventional weapons against it¡¯ that poses a critical threat to sovereignty or territorial integrity.
We know it's not Biden ...due to the fact that he was wandering around the rain forest in Brazil when they said he authorized the use of U.S.-supplied long-range missiles by Ukraine to strike inside Russia a few days ago..
and it's not Kamala,,, since it appears she has entered the witness protection program and nowhere to be found..
So, who exactly do we have running this country?
We know it's not Biden ...due to the fact that he was wandering around the rain forest in Brazil when they said he authorized the use of U.S.-supplied long-range missiles by Ukraine to strike inside Russia a few days ago..
and it's not Kamala,,, since it appears she has entered the witness protection program and nowhere to be found..
So, who exactly do we have running this country?
Oligarchs. Blackrock. State Street. Vanguard.
People like Liz Cheney and John Kelly.
Oligarchs. Blackrock. State Street. Vanguard.
People like Liz Cheney and John Kelly.
I guess we should take it easy on Biden (just for today ) Since today is his birthday ...he turns 82 today and is now the oldest sitting president....in his case with age comes wisdom........and dementia.
I guess we should take it easy on Biden (just for today ) Since today is his birthday ...he turns 82 today and is now the oldest sitting president....in his case with age comes wisdom........and dementia.
Dealing with it with my mother in law. And she's a good 6 years younger.
Dealing with it with my mother in law. And she's a good 6 years younger.
Me too ....with my mother it started when she was around 80 years old ,,and after she had two mini strokes..I took care of her till she died a few years later..I had to keep telling myself .... to remember how she was before and that she was not herself anymore.. God Bless Her
Me too ....with my mother it started when she was around 80 years old ,,and after she had two mini strokes..I took care of her till she died a few years later..I had to keep telling myself .... to remember how she was before and that she was not herself anymore.. God Bless Her
@SarasotaSlim
Biden is closer in age to Jimmy Carter, who was president almost 50 years ago, than he is to Obama, who was president 8 years ago.
Biden's birthday is closer to Abraham Lincoln's presidency than his own.
@SarasotaSlim
Biden is closer in age to Jimmy Carter, who was president almost 50 years ago, than he is to Obama, who was president 8 years ago.
Biden's birthday is closer to Abraham Lincoln's presidency than his own.
I don't think that's right. It's close one way or the other.
I don't think that's right. It's close one way or the other.
@Raiders22
Jimah Carter
Every time I hear his name ..I think how insane it was for him to to give away the Panama Canal..He agreed to the transfer it in return for nothing...
Upwards of 22,000 people died building the Panama Canal... 350 of them were Americans,,,
Many would call the worst treaties a U.S. president ever signed.
@Raiders22
Jimah Carter
Every time I hear his name ..I think how insane it was for him to to give away the Panama Canal..He agreed to the transfer it in return for nothing...
Upwards of 22,000 people died building the Panama Canal... 350 of them were Americans,,,
Many would call the worst treaties a U.S. president ever signed.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.