Quote Originally Posted by davemsh: Also not sure what the confusion is...The committee made it clear weeks ago that its the 4 best teams...and not the 4 most deserving...It is what it is... Isn't 13-0 bester than 12-1?
if so, then Liberty should be in the national semifinals
0
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh: Also not sure what the confusion is...The committee made it clear weeks ago that its the 4 best teams...and not the 4 most deserving...It is what it is... Isn't 13-0 bester than 12-1?
if so, then Liberty should be in the national semifinals
Quote Originally Posted by kimberton: @DeezyAZ81 They did win their 2 games and in those TWO games PROVED committee and any respectable human being with EYES that they WERE NOT the same team or anywhere close to it WITHOUT travis thatĄ¯s LITERALLY the reason your boys arenĄ¯t in the CFP. bamas body of work speaks for itself SOS wins against 1/11/13/21 opponents record 80-59 FSU opponents record what 67-76 but NONE of that matters you simply donĄ¯t have the same team nor are one of the BEST 4 teams if Travis were playing Bama is out. HeĄ¯s not and FSU in that 2 game dress rehearsal showed everyone they ARE NOT anywhere close to the BEST 4 teams without leader travis Tough shit now put on your big boy underwear and move on to the orange bowl where Georgia will make the committee look loke geniuses once they absolutely railroad your holes This makes zero sense. Bama legit looked like dog $hit a week ago and won. But you discredit FSU winning by more than Bama did last week at Auburn in both weeks without Jordan Travis. You are showing your Bama and SEC bias. It really is as simple as that. The committee got it wrong. If they thought FSU was so much lesser without Jordan Travis they should have been ranked 6-7 coming into this week, not #4. The committee just makes $hit up on the fly to get the SEC in, which is the problem.
Every team has off days. Bama is having a down year imo but they are still better than Florida State, even if Jordan Travis doesn't go down. There are years when I would argue that the ACC is arguably on par with the SEC but this isn't one of them. And I'm not one of those "the SEC is so much better" guys but there is no way any selection committee known to man is leaving the SEC champion out of the playoff. Personally, I probably put FSU in over Texas but this is what we face with a 4-team system. There are arguments to be made all around. Take solace in that this is the last year of these arguments.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by kimberton: @DeezyAZ81 They did win their 2 games and in those TWO games PROVED committee and any respectable human being with EYES that they WERE NOT the same team or anywhere close to it WITHOUT travis thatĄ¯s LITERALLY the reason your boys arenĄ¯t in the CFP. bamas body of work speaks for itself SOS wins against 1/11/13/21 opponents record 80-59 FSU opponents record what 67-76 but NONE of that matters you simply donĄ¯t have the same team nor are one of the BEST 4 teams if Travis were playing Bama is out. HeĄ¯s not and FSU in that 2 game dress rehearsal showed everyone they ARE NOT anywhere close to the BEST 4 teams without leader travis Tough shit now put on your big boy underwear and move on to the orange bowl where Georgia will make the committee look loke geniuses once they absolutely railroad your holes This makes zero sense. Bama legit looked like dog $hit a week ago and won. But you discredit FSU winning by more than Bama did last week at Auburn in both weeks without Jordan Travis. You are showing your Bama and SEC bias. It really is as simple as that. The committee got it wrong. If they thought FSU was so much lesser without Jordan Travis they should have been ranked 6-7 coming into this week, not #4. The committee just makes $hit up on the fly to get the SEC in, which is the problem.
Every team has off days. Bama is having a down year imo but they are still better than Florida State, even if Jordan Travis doesn't go down. There are years when I would argue that the ACC is arguably on par with the SEC but this isn't one of them. And I'm not one of those "the SEC is so much better" guys but there is no way any selection committee known to man is leaving the SEC champion out of the playoff. Personally, I probably put FSU in over Texas but this is what we face with a 4-team system. There are arguments to be made all around. Take solace in that this is the last year of these arguments.
Tough shit now put on your big boy underwear and move on to the orange bowl where Georgia will make the committee look loke geniuses once they absolutely railroad your holes
0
Quote Originally Posted by kimberton:
Tough shit now put on your big boy underwear and move on to the orange bowl where Georgia will make the committee look loke geniuses once they absolutely railroad your holes
The committee is bias against cheating Michigan and will find a team that has the best chance to take them out.
Michigan #2. Since #1 got dethroned, Michigan goes to #1. We know that 1 plays 4 so they need a team that can beat cheating Michigan. Only two teams that can do it. Bama or Georgia. You can't put Georgia in because they don't have the sec championship ring to qualify. Bama it is.
A rematch between bama vs Texas will be better for ratings. Pac 12? A joke
If bama wins Michigan, they will take it all.
If Michigan beats bama, still have Texas to take them out.
You can tell how harbough was fumbling with his speech after knowing that he's up against the Michigan killer. If harbough last game, he wants to go away with that trophy. His dream got diminished hence his reaction during the press conference. The script, according to me is to retire Saban with that trophy. Future hall of famer goes out large and with a bang.
X_____________________________
0
The committee is bias against cheating Michigan and will find a team that has the best chance to take them out.
Michigan #2. Since #1 got dethroned, Michigan goes to #1. We know that 1 plays 4 so they need a team that can beat cheating Michigan. Only two teams that can do it. Bama or Georgia. You can't put Georgia in because they don't have the sec championship ring to qualify. Bama it is.
A rematch between bama vs Texas will be better for ratings. Pac 12? A joke
If bama wins Michigan, they will take it all.
If Michigan beats bama, still have Texas to take them out.
You can tell how harbough was fumbling with his speech after knowing that he's up against the Michigan killer. If harbough last game, he wants to go away with that trophy. His dream got diminished hence his reaction during the press conference. The script, according to me is to retire Saban with that trophy. Future hall of famer goes out large and with a bang.
The committee is bias against cheating Michigan and will find a team that has the best chance to take them out. Michigan #2. Since #1 got dethroned, Michigan goes to #1. We know that 1 plays 4 so they need a team that can beat cheating Michigan. Only two teams that can do it. Bama or Georgia. You can't put Georgia in because they don't have the sec championship ring to qualify. Bama it is. A rematch between bama vs Texas will be better for ratings. Pac 12? A joke If bama wins Michigan, they will take it all. If Michigan beats bama, still have Texas to take them out. You can tell how harbough was fumbling with his speech after knowing that he's up against the Michigan killer. If harbough last game, he wants to go away with that trophy. His dream got diminished hence his reaction during the press conference. The script, according to me is to retire Saban with that trophy. Future hall of famer goes out large and with a bang.
Any of the top 5 teams can take out Michigan. Hell TCU took them out last year, and Georgia blew them out the year before. They have not fared well in this tournament because they cannot play D or match up athletically with the other teams. Everyone claiming committee did not want another TCU situation when TCU won a semifinal game last year and put it on Michigan. FSU is far better on TCU with NFL players all over both sides of the ball. Yes, Bama is going to beat the piss out of them too.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:
The committee is bias against cheating Michigan and will find a team that has the best chance to take them out. Michigan #2. Since #1 got dethroned, Michigan goes to #1. We know that 1 plays 4 so they need a team that can beat cheating Michigan. Only two teams that can do it. Bama or Georgia. You can't put Georgia in because they don't have the sec championship ring to qualify. Bama it is. A rematch between bama vs Texas will be better for ratings. Pac 12? A joke If bama wins Michigan, they will take it all. If Michigan beats bama, still have Texas to take them out. You can tell how harbough was fumbling with his speech after knowing that he's up against the Michigan killer. If harbough last game, he wants to go away with that trophy. His dream got diminished hence his reaction during the press conference. The script, according to me is to retire Saban with that trophy. Future hall of famer goes out large and with a bang.
Any of the top 5 teams can take out Michigan. Hell TCU took them out last year, and Georgia blew them out the year before. They have not fared well in this tournament because they cannot play D or match up athletically with the other teams. Everyone claiming committee did not want another TCU situation when TCU won a semifinal game last year and put it on Michigan. FSU is far better on TCU with NFL players all over both sides of the ball. Yes, Bama is going to beat the piss out of them too.
This committee and its games are owned by ESPN. The narrative has to change every year to keep propagating sec dominance and make sure they get at least one team, preferably two get in. They wouldĄ¯ve been in a pickle if JT didnĄ¯t get hurt justifying the same final rankings but may have just kept texas out. Next watch how the replay booth behaves if itĄ¯s a tight game they can help keep the sec school aliveĄ. This Ą°tournamentĄą is all about money for espn
0
This committee and its games are owned by ESPN. The narrative has to change every year to keep propagating sec dominance and make sure they get at least one team, preferably two get in. They wouldĄ¯ve been in a pickle if JT didnĄ¯t get hurt justifying the same final rankings but may have just kept texas out. Next watch how the replay booth behaves if itĄ¯s a tight game they can help keep the sec school aliveĄ. This Ą°tournamentĄą is all about money for espn
This committee and its games are owned by ESPN. The narrative has to change every year to keep propagating sec dominance and make sure they get at least one team, preferably two get in. They would’ve been in a pickle if JT didn’t get hurt justifying the same final rankings but may have just kept texas out. Next watch how the replay booth behaves if it’s a tight game they can help keep the sec school alive…. This “tournament” is all about money for espn
And rightfully so...Who won the natty the last 4 years? Georgia..Georgia...Bama..LSU.....U make no sense...Until proven otherwise the SEC is the best conference..and will get even better..with Texas and OU joining... What conference gets the most players drafted and has the most players in the NFL? You guessed it..the SEC
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
Quote Originally Posted by therizz:
This committee and its games are owned by ESPN. The narrative has to change every year to keep propagating sec dominance and make sure they get at least one team, preferably two get in. They would’ve been in a pickle if JT didn’t get hurt justifying the same final rankings but may have just kept texas out. Next watch how the replay booth behaves if it’s a tight game they can help keep the sec school alive…. This “tournament” is all about money for espn
And rightfully so...Who won the natty the last 4 years? Georgia..Georgia...Bama..LSU.....U make no sense...Until proven otherwise the SEC is the best conference..and will get even better..with Texas and OU joining... What conference gets the most players drafted and has the most players in the NFL? You guessed it..the SEC
Quote Originally Posted by therizz: This committee and its games are owned by ESPN. The narrative has to change every year to keep propagating sec dominance and make sure they get at least one team, preferably two get in. They wouldĄ¯ve been in a pickle if JT didnĄ¯t get hurt justifying the same final rankings but may have just kept texas out. Next watch how the replay booth behaves if itĄ¯s a tight game they can help keep the sec school aliveĄ. This Ą°tournamentĄą is all about money for espn And rightfully so...Who won the natty the last 4 years? Georgia..Georgia...Bama..LSU.....U make no sense...Until proven otherwise the SEC is the best conference..and will get even better..with Texas and OU joining... What conference gets the most players drafted and has the most players in the NFL? You guessed it..the SEC
Easier to win playing in a tournament hosted by your dad. Most likely to get favorable matchups, replay booth calls, and multiple teams in. They change the rules every year, but the point of all of it is to make espn money.
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by therizz: This committee and its games are owned by ESPN. The narrative has to change every year to keep propagating sec dominance and make sure they get at least one team, preferably two get in. They wouldĄ¯ve been in a pickle if JT didnĄ¯t get hurt justifying the same final rankings but may have just kept texas out. Next watch how the replay booth behaves if itĄ¯s a tight game they can help keep the sec school aliveĄ. This Ą°tournamentĄą is all about money for espn And rightfully so...Who won the natty the last 4 years? Georgia..Georgia...Bama..LSU.....U make no sense...Until proven otherwise the SEC is the best conference..and will get even better..with Texas and OU joining... What conference gets the most players drafted and has the most players in the NFL? You guessed it..the SEC
Easier to win playing in a tournament hosted by your dad. Most likely to get favorable matchups, replay booth calls, and multiple teams in. They change the rules every year, but the point of all of it is to make espn money.
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
1
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
agree with everything said here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by winddust:
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: Quote Originally Posted by davemsh: Also not sure what the confusion is...The committee made it clear weeks ago that its the 4 best teams...and not the 4 most deserving...It is what it is... Isn't 13-0 bester than 12-1? if so, then Liberty should be in the national semifinals
nah cincy and ucf proved that if youre not in a power 5 conference then you need to go undefeated 2 straight years to be considered to make playoffs
0
Quote Originally Posted by jefff:
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: Quote Originally Posted by davemsh: Also not sure what the confusion is...The committee made it clear weeks ago that its the 4 best teams...and not the 4 most deserving...It is what it is... Isn't 13-0 bester than 12-1? if so, then Liberty should be in the national semifinals
nah cincy and ucf proved that if youre not in a power 5 conference then you need to go undefeated 2 straight years to be considered to make playoffs
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
Hold that thought till after Georgia blow them out in bowl game with their starter guys sitting out.
There is a reason why the committee do not believe FL St and her undefeated team can even beat Michigan. Bama proved they can take down #1 Georgia. Michigan is next.
X_____________________________
0
Quote Originally Posted by winddust:
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
Hold that thought till after Georgia blow them out in bowl game with their starter guys sitting out.
There is a reason why the committee do not believe FL St and her undefeated team can even beat Michigan. Bama proved they can take down #1 Georgia. Michigan is next.
The committee has and always will put in anyone they want. This started in the first CFP year. 2014. Let me break it down. TCU IS #3 going into final weekend and blows out Iowa State. Ohio State goes into final weekend VS. Michigan with a brand-new backup quarterback. The QB who had played the whole year since the first game Barrett went down late in the last game. So, Ohio State who is #6 wins with Cardale Jones. Yeh remember him.
Anyway, CFP drops TCU TO #6 Put OSU #4. #4 With a QB who has played 1 game. Guess who won the CFP that year? Oh yes, they did. OSU! Point is anyone can be in this mess, and anyone can win this mess. The CFP holds the Golden Hammer.
0
The committee has and always will put in anyone they want. This started in the first CFP year. 2014. Let me break it down. TCU IS #3 going into final weekend and blows out Iowa State. Ohio State goes into final weekend VS. Michigan with a brand-new backup quarterback. The QB who had played the whole year since the first game Barrett went down late in the last game. So, Ohio State who is #6 wins with Cardale Jones. Yeh remember him.
Anyway, CFP drops TCU TO #6 Put OSU #4. #4 With a QB who has played 1 game. Guess who won the CFP that year? Oh yes, they did. OSU! Point is anyone can be in this mess, and anyone can win this mess. The CFP holds the Golden Hammer.
The committee has and always will put in anyone they want. This started in the first CFP year. 2014. Let me break it down. TCU IS #3 going into final weekend and blows out Iowa State. Ohio State goes into final weekend VS. Michigan with a brand-new backup quarterback. The QB who had played the whole year since the first game Barrett went down late in the last game. So, Ohio State who is #6 wins with Cardale Jones. Yeh remember him. Anyway, CFP drops TCU TO #6 Put OSU #4. #4 With a QB who has played 1 game. Guess who won the CFP that year? Oh yes, they did. OSU! Point is anyone can be in this mess, and anyone can win this mess. The CFP holds the Golden Hammer.
yep Ive said same thing from day 1 they put whoever they want in and the sheep try to make sense out of the nonsense.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gotime:
The committee has and always will put in anyone they want. This started in the first CFP year. 2014. Let me break it down. TCU IS #3 going into final weekend and blows out Iowa State. Ohio State goes into final weekend VS. Michigan with a brand-new backup quarterback. The QB who had played the whole year since the first game Barrett went down late in the last game. So, Ohio State who is #6 wins with Cardale Jones. Yeh remember him. Anyway, CFP drops TCU TO #6 Put OSU #4. #4 With a QB who has played 1 game. Guess who won the CFP that year? Oh yes, they did. OSU! Point is anyone can be in this mess, and anyone can win this mess. The CFP holds the Golden Hammer.
yep Ive said same thing from day 1 they put whoever they want in and the sheep try to make sense out of the nonsense.
The committee has and always will put in anyone they want. This started in the first CFP year. 2014. Let me break it down. TCU IS #3 going into final weekend and blows out Iowa State. Ohio State goes into final weekend VS. Michigan with a brand-new backup quarterback. The QB who had played the whole year since the first game Barrett went down late in the last game. So, Ohio State who is #6 wins with Cardale Jones. Yeh remember him. Anyway, CFP drops TCU TO #6 Put OSU #4. #4 With a QB who has played 1 game. Guess who won the CFP that year? Oh yes, they did. OSU! Point is anyone can be in this mess, and anyone can win this mess. The CFP holds the Golden Hammer.
The difference this year is cheating Michigan and what the committee is going to do about it and still be in compliance with the publics view. Astros and the world's series or Brady deflate gate?
Like zebras, which team is the script in favor for? They added bama in which is like letting the tiger back into the race and now Michigan is sweating all over again.
X_____________________________
0
Quote Originally Posted by gotime:
The committee has and always will put in anyone they want. This started in the first CFP year. 2014. Let me break it down. TCU IS #3 going into final weekend and blows out Iowa State. Ohio State goes into final weekend VS. Michigan with a brand-new backup quarterback. The QB who had played the whole year since the first game Barrett went down late in the last game. So, Ohio State who is #6 wins with Cardale Jones. Yeh remember him. Anyway, CFP drops TCU TO #6 Put OSU #4. #4 With a QB who has played 1 game. Guess who won the CFP that year? Oh yes, they did. OSU! Point is anyone can be in this mess, and anyone can win this mess. The CFP holds the Golden Hammer.
The difference this year is cheating Michigan and what the committee is going to do about it and still be in compliance with the publics view. Astros and the world's series or Brady deflate gate?
Like zebras, which team is the script in favor for? They added bama in which is like letting the tiger back into the race and now Michigan is sweating all over again.
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
Spot on with all of this. The committee and the media's defenders of this BS, claim they do not want blowouts in these games when that is usually what the fans get regardless of what teams are in. I read since the 4 team playoff started (2014), only 6 of 18 semifinal games have been decided by 14 points or less (2tds). Ironically, last year both semis were within a touchdown including TCU (who actually beat Michigan). The average margin of victory when 1 beats 4 is (20 points per game). Average margin of victory when 2 seed beats 3 seed is 33 points per game! The committee does not care about keeping games close, they are just making up excuses to secure SEC's spot. They do not have some crystal ball in which they know how games turn out or can guarantee games are close when the majority of the times they are not close.
None of these fans or committee members care about blowouts when Clemson blows out Bama in a title game, or Bama blows out Ohio State or Notre Dame, Or Georgia blows out Michigan in semi. It's all nonsense.
ESPN and committee just wanted Bama and SEC in, plain and simple. Please stop with we don't want another TCU in like last year. First off, TCU won a semifinal game and put up 50 points on a Michigan team praised for their defense. Secondly, FSU is a storied program with an elite defense, NFL athletes everywhere on both sides of the ball, unlike TCU last year.
1
Quote Originally Posted by winddust:
The losing QB is not a valid point. Did backup QBs go 3-0 in conference championships. Did backup Browning torch the Jags. Who would of thought that. It is what makes sports exciting the unknown. Florida St went undefeated in a Power 5 conference. They won 3 games with backup qb. Everyone is saying Florida St would get blown out. So what if they did most of the playoff games are blowouts anyways. Fl St held LSU to their lowest point total of season to 24 and 7 came on garbage late. Whatever QB they have would have a month to prepare as well. The Travis out angle is just idiotic.
Spot on with all of this. The committee and the media's defenders of this BS, claim they do not want blowouts in these games when that is usually what the fans get regardless of what teams are in. I read since the 4 team playoff started (2014), only 6 of 18 semifinal games have been decided by 14 points or less (2tds). Ironically, last year both semis were within a touchdown including TCU (who actually beat Michigan). The average margin of victory when 1 beats 4 is (20 points per game). Average margin of victory when 2 seed beats 3 seed is 33 points per game! The committee does not care about keeping games close, they are just making up excuses to secure SEC's spot. They do not have some crystal ball in which they know how games turn out or can guarantee games are close when the majority of the times they are not close.
None of these fans or committee members care about blowouts when Clemson blows out Bama in a title game, or Bama blows out Ohio State or Notre Dame, Or Georgia blows out Michigan in semi. It's all nonsense.
ESPN and committee just wanted Bama and SEC in, plain and simple. Please stop with we don't want another TCU in like last year. First off, TCU won a semifinal game and put up 50 points on a Michigan team praised for their defense. Secondly, FSU is a storied program with an elite defense, NFL athletes everywhere on both sides of the ball, unlike TCU last year.
Yet you will keep watching their Playoff rankings show, they win. They donĄ¯t care if anyone is mad, still make exact same amount of money. Fascinating that Texas isnĄ¯t mentioned as team that doesnĄ¯t belong, Big 12 schedule is rough.
He is a very smart guy.
0
Yet you will keep watching their Playoff rankings show, they win. They donĄ¯t care if anyone is mad, still make exact same amount of money. Fascinating that Texas isnĄ¯t mentioned as team that doesnĄ¯t belong, Big 12 schedule is rough.
Yet you will keep watching their Playoff rankings show, they win. They donĄ¯t care if anyone is mad, still make exact same amount of money. Fascinating that Texas isnĄ¯t mentioned as team that doesnĄ¯t belong, Big 12 schedule is rough.
I mentioned I have no idea how Texas jumped FSU either to #3 for beating OK St. Said that the day they won Big 12 when people were hyping them. So odd. Who actually watches that show? The only thing that matters is final rankings. Committee does not give a shit about it's own rankings.
0
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Yet you will keep watching their Playoff rankings show, they win. They donĄ¯t care if anyone is mad, still make exact same amount of money. Fascinating that Texas isnĄ¯t mentioned as team that doesnĄ¯t belong, Big 12 schedule is rough.
I mentioned I have no idea how Texas jumped FSU either to #3 for beating OK St. Said that the day they won Big 12 when people were hyping them. So odd. Who actually watches that show? The only thing that matters is final rankings. Committee does not give a shit about it's own rankings.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.