Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by BeeRich: It's probably going to be a tight fit either way, which is why I bought the hook. Something tells me USC will come to play tonight. Riley facing a 6-7 season if he loses this game isn't a good look for a program like USC and his coaching future....GL today!
@DrStrangelove GL on your wager amigo! I'm leaning on USC's OVER 25.5 team total in this one. My Aggies' D Line is missing 2 of our best players on the edge: Scourton and Stewart. Also liking Marcell Reed Over 51.5 rushing yards. Hammer 'em Strange!! |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
USC +3.5 (-121)
USC is a running dog. The running dogs are 3-0 so far the the bowls. I expect that streak will probably end today with Wazzu. I got a terrible opening number of +7. I don't think I'm going to beat the closing line with this one...LOL. Of course that was before all of the portal departures. This new era of college football sucks! Here's a crazy stat: There has only been one actual running dog so far in the 16+ bowl games. Which is totally unbelievable! I've never seen it before. And that one running dog West Virginia was just a push if you took them at +5. That means all of my running dogs so far have failed to outrush their opponents, but still covered. Like I said, I've never seen it happen with that many games having been played. We'll see what happens tonight with USC.
|
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
For the Playoff running dogs (PRD) this week, I have Boise State and Notre Dame as PRDs (Irish w/ better D too). As for Ohio St/Oregon, Ohio St was -3 at Oregon and are now -2.5 neutral. So from a line value persective 2.5 is pretty cheap...Just sayin'. I haven't really decided yet what I want to do with this one. My own line on the game is pretty much a pickem.
|
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
USF/SJST over 62
Getting this early because it's starting to creep up over 62...A couple defensive juggernauts having a good time in Hawaii |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Skydog1842:
@DrStrangelove I'm getting to the party late but great call on State... |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
Good luck LH |
LonghornHoosier | 10 |
|
|
Penn St -8 Texas -13 tOSU/Tenn under 47 |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
Notre Dame/Indy over 49.5 |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
The running dogs are 2-0 so far. Jax St isn't a running dog, but they do run the ball well. Just a pizza and wings bet on Jax St +7 (-119) I may have a play on the game tonight. Just waiting to see what the line does. |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
The running dogs are 2-0 so far. Jax St isn't a running dog, but they do run the ball well. Just a pizza and wings bet on Jax St +7 (-119) I may have a play on the game tonight. Just waiting to see what the line does. |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
@Boisestateand8 Have a great holiday Boise. Good luck going forward. |
Boisestateand8 | 17 |
|
|
replied to
***Macwesties * Thur. Dec. 19, 2024 * NCAAF * New Orleans Bowl * College Football Play***
in College Football Good luck Mac. You got a good number. |
Macwestie1 | 12 |
|
|
I've got a lean tonight on Sammy Houston +3.5. They are one of my running dogs, but they've lost some value from when I played them at +6 for a half unit...UNLV won last night making the running dogs 1-0. But the line moved a full touchdown from my +4 number so I didn't make them a play....Good luck tonight! |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
@fubah2 Good job! |
fubah2 | 3106 |
|
|
Good luck in the bowls |
MrFreedo | 12 |
|
|
Navy +6.5 I lean the over 39 but I hate trying to buck a very strong trend. |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bridge1: I hope they do better than they did in the regular season. But who knows? This portal stuff is getting crazy with these bowls. Hope you a profitable bowl season Bridge
The running dogs .. love it .. like magic they just find a way to make money .. good luck as always doc! |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
|
replied to
***Macwesties * Sat. Dec. 14, 2024 * NCAAF * Week #16 * College Football Play***
in College Football Good luck Mac |
Macwestie1 | 26 |
|
|
BOL this bowl season HooTrain |
WahooS | 129 |
|
|
Time to dust off the bowl running dogs and maybe sprinkle in a couple playoff games. The probable running dogs did well last year (7-4) and I had a good 2023 bowl season going 16-7. I'm going on the 19th year of doing these running dogs. By their standards, they had a terrible regular season, but still hit around 53%. Hopefully they improve for the bowls. The Probable Running Dogs (PRD's) have hit 60.63% over the last 18 years, with a total of only 4 losing bowl seasons. The last 3 years they have gone 10-3, 11-6, 7-4. The transfer portal opened just 3 days ago, so I'm going to be pretty careful posting my bowl plays too far ahead of the game. The playoffs are a different story since those teams should have everybody ready to play and motivated. Here is this year's Running Dogs. I got these lines on the opening numbers, so the majority of them have changed. I played them all blindly for a half a unit, but they aren't my official plays, nor are they my opinions of the games. They are strictly the PRD numbers, and nothing more:
The 2024-25 potential Bowl Running Dogs:
204 UNLV +4** 206 Sam Houston +6 (D) 223 USF +3 238 Washington State +7 240 USC +3.5 251 ECU +5.5 245 ULL +10.5 (D)** 253 BYU +3 (D) 257 Iowa +3.5 (D) 260 Michigan +11.5 265 Baylor +2 280 Va Tech +4.5 ** G5 vs P4
Potential Playoff game predictions:
Texas v ASU ¡ Devils would not be the PRD Ohio St v Oregon ¡ if Ohio State is the dog they¡¯d be the PRD w/ better D ¡ so would Tennessee Boise State vs Penn State ¡. Boise will be the PRD, but tough to ¡°see¡± them outrushing PSU Notre Dame vs UGA ¡ The Irish will be the PRD w/ the better D |
DrStrangelove | 29 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.