Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
One thing I can promise you, Boise will bring their A game to Glendale. Whether or not you believe Jeanty should've won the Heisman is irrelevant. The team and coaches believe he should've won it. Also, Jeanty was the only one of the four finalists that wore his team colors, saying that he wouldn't even be in New York if it wasn't for Boise St. And he recently took his entire offensive line to a swank restaurant, paying a tab that exceeded $1000! Finally, this team is completely healthy and rested, and with a chip on their shoulder. They may not have 5 star talent, but they have 5 star heart and 5 star attitude. I wouldn't underestimate 'em. |
WahooS | 66 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Skipster:
Boise has one player. |
WahooS | 66 |
|
|
Well folks, after the CFP first round that we just witnessed, there are those who want to blow this whole thing up and start over. Some prefer taking the best teams, period. Some, like me, believe winning your conference title should count for something. What I propose is a combination of both viewpoints. For instance, my top four seeds would include any conference champion ranked in the top five by the committee. In this case it would be 1-OREGON, 2- GEORGIA, 3-Texas and 4-Penn St. (Conference champs in CAPS). Seeds five through eight would include any conference champ ranked in the top ten. That would be 5-Notre Dame, 6-Ohio St., 7-BOISE ST. and 8-Tennessee (I would flip Boise and Tennessee to avoid a Vols matchup with conference rival Georgia in the second round. Teams in the same conference wouldn't meet until the semifinals under this proposal.) Seeds nine through 12 would include any conference champion ranked in the top 15, so we'd have 9-Indiana, 10-Smu, 11-Alabama and 12-ARIZONA ST. 11 of the 12 teams that made it to this year's CFP would still be in. Alabama would replace Clemson. NOW, if the playoffs expanded to 16 teams, seeds 13 through 16 would include any conference champion ranked in the top 20. So we'd have 13-Ole Miss, 14-Miami FL, 15-CLEMSON and 16-South Carolina. Then if you really wanna get crazy and adopt the 24 team FCS model, where the top eight seeds get the first round bye, AND all nine conferences are represented, seeds 17 through 20 would include any conference champ ranked in the top 25. That would be 17-Byu, 18-Iowa St., 19-Illinois and 20-ARMY. Rounding out the bracket would be 21-Missouri, 22-MARSHALL, 23-OHIO U and 24-JACKSONVILLE ST. Higher seeds would host the first two rounds. Let's face it, with the transfer portal the bowl system is broken. Thoughts?
|
Boisestateand8 | 10 |
|
|
It's messed up that we have two teams from the BIG in the Rose Bowl, and possibly the two best teams in the country! I'd rather see Ohio St. vs Texas in the Peach Bowl and Oregon playing ASU in the Rose. Having said that, gut says Ohio St., Texas, Georgia and ..............BOISE ST. (C'mon, who else am I gonna go with?) I'm actually attending my first Fiesta Bowl. Staying in Vegas on the way. Got a C note in my rainy day fund I might put on the money line! Merry Christmas to all! |
WahooS | 66 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bitters:
@WahooS THE TAB FROM SIZZLER Hey it's almost Christmas! Why don't you take a few days off from being a dick? |
vanzack | 208 |
|
|
replied to
The irony. Both TX and Penn St have double digit spreads… while Ore and GA…
in College Football Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing:
Oregon should be playing either Boise or Arizona St. Oregon and Ohio St are likely the two best teams in college football, yet are playing each other in the round of 8? I don't like that two BIG teams are matched up in the Rose Bowl. Ohio St should be playing Texas in the Peach and ASU should be playing Oregon in the Rose. That's the only problem I have with the format. And in hindsight, I STILL don't have a problem with SMU and Indiana getting in to the CFP. Both teams earned their shot. I doubt that ANY SEC team, used to warm weather, would've fared any better at Notre Dame, Penn St. or Ohio St. in subfreezing temps. That's my story and I'm sticking with it. |
getem474 | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
I took Penn St - 9 for small action but will not recommend it or make it official, just can¡¯t trust Franklin with the forums money good luck peeps on whatever you bet for this early one I'm done betting for the year, but SMU is the only team in the playoffs with a negative turnover differential. That certainly showed up in the first half! I don't see a second half comeback in these weather conditions for the warm weather Mustangs. Tennessee -Ohio St. looks like a defensive slobberknocker. Not sure the Buckeyes have recovered from the Michigan meltdown. |
WahooS | 55 |
|
|
Done with betting for the year, but for what it's worth here are my takes on the three playoff games today. PENN ST. (-8, down from -8') vs Smu - Seems like a big number, but with temps in the 20s and wind chill in the teens, I can't help but recall how UNLV and Tulane played at cold weather venues in their respective conference title games. Also, the Mustangs are the only team in the playoffs with a minus turnover differential, and while it's hard to handicap turnovers it seems likely that the Nittany Lions will win the turnover battle here. Feels like a 27-13 kinda game, with Penn St. pounding the rock down SMU's throat, and keeping that high powered Mustang offense on the sidelines. TEXAS (-13', up from -11) vs Clemson - Longhorns have only lost twice, both times against Georgia. Dabo is 6-2 ATS as a postseason dog, but this isn't the same Clemson team as in years past. Texas is no guarantee though when laying doubles. OHIO ST. (-7, down from -7') vs Tennessee - Another cold weather game, which favors the more physical team. That's not necessarily the home team Buckeyes though. We haven't seen them since they lost to Michigan as a three TD favorite. Not sure they've recovered from that. This one has all the makings of a defensive slobberknocker. Feels like a 24-17 type game. BOL to all and Merry Christmas! Cheers!
|
Boisestateand8 | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by pavaman58:
@KingBet50 TB will crush the CowGirls Maybe. But what would this line be if Dak Prescott were playing? I only ask because his QBR is about the same as Cooper Rush's. Rush has a lower completion percentage, but hasn't been as interception prone. Cowboys have also found their run game, Bucs are on the road again...........I'm done betting for the season, after one of my worst years in 40 years of doing this, but IF I were betting it, I'd be on Dallas +4. |
theclaw | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mikebdb:
Hope it lasts..a gambling addiction is just as hard to break as a drug addiction Not an addiction, friend. Never have I had a problem walking away. I love handicapping, but the game has changed over the years, especially with the transfer portal and NIL. There's so much to keep track of nowadays. Plus, I've lost what I could afford to lose, and I have a Fiesta Bowl to attend! |
Boisestateand8 | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kimoinsd808:
Thanks for all the useful info you posted throughout the season. I wish it would've been more useful to me! |
Boisestateand8 | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bateman15:
@Boisestateand8 That would not shock me either. That said, barring Riley Leonard turning into a turnover machine similar to the NIU game, IU winning this game outright is highly unlikely for several reasons. The first reason is that the only position advantages I see IU having are @ QB and WR. And that is somewhat negated by ND’s excellent pass defense and secondary. Plus the weather in South Bend will not be optimal for passing for either team. Much more difficult to catch passes in 20 degree weather with wind gusts than we are used to seeing IU do so effectively earlier this season. I am on board with the Hoo Train recommendation on IU +3 1Q. But after that Cig is somewhat limited by playing against a Notre Dame team with substantially more talent at nearly every other position and a tremendous depth advantage. IU’s depth problem appeared to be exposed in the Ohio State game. Imo, as the game moves forward Friday night, Notre Dame will be able to physically wear IU down, especially in the run game.
I'm not questioning Notre Dame's talent. They COULD do to Indiana what Ohio St. did. But this Hoosier team is the best they've faced all year, including Texas A&M. If the weather forecast holds true, with snow and cold in the forecast, that negates any talent advantage. Crap weather is the great equalizer for teams that are used to playing in it. |
WahooS | 129 |
|
|
Folks, I'm pulling the plug on this season. Gambling on football is a game of skill, but there's a certain amount of luck involved, and this year my luck has been mostly shitty. You can look at the Xs and Os until you're blue in the face, but you can't handicap turnovers, QB injuries, bad calls, etc. I've picked some clunkers this year for sure, but I've had more bad beats this year than any year I can remember, and I've been doing this for 40 years! Bottom line, it's no fun when you repeatedly get your brains bashed in, so I'm closing the book on this season. Last night's WKU loss was the last straw. BOL to you all for the rest of the year. |
Boisestateand8 | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
nice calls last night Train while I was occupied Over over over boom Collab Recommendation Number 2 Indiana + 1.5 first quarter we will take scripted Cig over Freeman every day of the week, tie game we win, 7-6 game, we win, you get the point I kinda like em for the whole game. Cignetti's playoff experience with JMU could be a factor, and this is Notre Dame's toughest test yet! Indy tends to start fast and finish strong. Wouldn't shock me to see them win outright. |
WahooS | 129 |
|
|
It's been miserable year for me picking winners, maybe my worst ever! But here goes.... 3* Western Kentucky +7' over James Madison - Writeup is on my other thread. BOL to all. |
Boisestateand8 | 1 |
|
|
Friday
Cure Bowl in Orlando FL Ohio (-4', up from -2') vs Jacksonville St. - Battle of conference champions. Jax St. won the C-USA title with a 52-12 rout of WKU and then saw HC Rich Rodriguez leave for West Virginia. Ohio blasted Miami OH, 38-3, to win the MAC championship, and then HC Tim Albin left to coach Charlotte. Both teams will be coached by their OCs in this one, and both teams feature strong run games, AND both teams come in hot. The Gamecocks have won nine of their last ten (7-3 ATS) after a 0-3 start, while the Bobcats are on a 6-0 SU, ATS and ITS run, winning each game by at least 17 points. As for the transfer portal, Ohio's roster seems to be virtually intact, despite the coaching change, as opposed to Jax St. which suffered some losses. Hence the line movement towards Ohio U. Gasparilla Bowl in Tampa FL Florida (-13', up from -11') vs Tulane - Two teams headed in opposite directions. Gators finished the season strong, winning three straight, and have covered eight of their last nine games, earning Billy Napier a contract extension after he spent much of the season on the hot seat. The Green Wave were in the CFP conversation until a shocking 34-24 loss at home to Memphis, and then were routed at West Point in the AAC title game. While Tulane was able to hold on to HC Jon Sumrall, they weren't as fortunate hanging on to their QBs, with starter Darian Mensah and backup Kai Horton both hitting the portal, among others. Florida looks like the right side here, but I loathe laying double digits in bowl games. 1st round CFP NOTRE DAME (-7, down from -7') vs Indiana - Cold temps and snow are in the forecast for this battle of one loss teams. Hoosiers HC Curt Cignetti knows a thing or two about playoff games, having been in a number of them during his time at JMU. Indiana was on cruise control for the first nine games of the season, before struggling to a 20-15 win over Michigan and being blown out at Ohio St. 38-15. The Fighting Irish are on a 10-0 SU, 9-1 ATS run, but this is by far the toughest test the Irish will have faced all year, at least since the opener at Texas A&M. The Hoosiers generally start fast and finish strong, and Cignetti's playoff experience could give them a significant advantage. I'm leaning Indiana in this one. |
Boisestateand8 | 23 |
|
|
replied to
***Macwesties * Wed. Dec. 18, 2024 * NCAAF * Boca Raton Bowl * LA Bowl * College Football Plays***
in College Football BOL Mac! |
Macwestie1 | 19 |
|
|
Wow, UNLV is now -3. Gonna have to pass on that one. But WKU +7' has got my attention, mainly because of HC Tyson Helton's 4-1 bowl record, and JMU missing their starting QB. Hilltoppers have a lot of kids in the portal though. Who's playing and who isn't playing is the question. Lean WKU at this number. Thursday New Orleans Bowl Georgia Southern (-6, up from -5) vs Sam Houston - Another instance where i might've jumped all over the dog if it was a regular season game. But with HC K.C. Keeler leaving for Temple, and the ensuing transfer portal chaos with the Bearkats, AND the fact that their offense has disappeared during the latter half of the season makes them unplayable in my opinion. The Eagles aren't bad. Throwing out the loss to Ole Miss, they're 4-1 SU and 4-0-1 ATS vs G5 bowl teams. However, they're 0-2 as bowl chalk the last two years under Clay Helton. |
Boisestateand8 | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by panthersrams:
Quote Originally Posted by cave0707: https://www.actionnetwork.com/ncaaf/2024-college-football-bowl-opt-outs-transfer-portal-updates-injury-tracker To see who's in or out. Just saw they have an opt-out tracker here on Covers too: College Football Bowl Game Opt-Out Tracker Good info, but some of these portal kids may actually play in their bowl game. Important to watch the line movements. UNLV line has flipped to Rebels -2. |
WahooS | 129 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
West Virginia is a shell of itself heading into tomorrow's game against Memphis. Its two primary receiving threats are out due to injury, its best LB/defender and starting CB have entered the portal. Their OC is keeping the seat warm until Rich Rod shows up to take over again. Memphis averages both more yds/per play and points/per play than W Virginia as well as has better metrics on defense for both YPP and PPP. I've had a decent amount of success using these numbers this season when all four point in one direction. For both of these reasons, I expect Memphis to beat a demoralized and less potent West Virginia tomorrow by at least a touchdown. Very possible. Only problem I have with those stats is the difference in the level of competition. WVU has played the far tougher schedule. And even though Rich Rod isn't coaching this game, the players MAY be inspired to impress their new coach. Tough call. |
jackedward32 | 14 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.