My anchors this week are a surprise....;-)
Anyone paying attention? anchors this week,what say you?
Playing PITT....lol
Playing PITT....lol
@jowchoo
@jowchoo
sorry i was wrong PITT THOUGH
sorry i was wrong PITT THOUGH
MNF (4-2)
YTD: 253-141
satilites:
1. LV under 47
2. CAR +17.5
3. TB under 47.5
4. TENN +14
5. NYG +11.5
6. DALL +16
7. CHI over 33
8. HOU over 35
9. NYG over 35
10. MINN over 33.5
11. SEA +7.5
12. DET -1
13. CHI +10
14. BAL +3.5
15. LV +11.5
16. INDY +14
MNF (4-2)
YTD: 253-141
satilites:
1. LV under 47
2. CAR +17.5
3. TB under 47.5
4. TENN +14
5. NYG +11.5
6. DALL +16
7. CHI over 33
8. HOU over 35
9. NYG over 35
10. MINN over 33.5
11. SEA +7.5
12. DET -1
13. CHI +10
14. BAL +3.5
15. LV +11.5
16. INDY +14
I don't get anything on either site with this one buddy.
I don't get anything on either site with this one buddy.
Just ran it at killer and it works fine.......................................gl
Just ran it at killer and it works fine.......................................gl
1) AD and t:wins = 3 and week = 12 and DIV and tS(W@A, N=3)<2 and o:wins<7
16-5 ATS....ON Patriots
2) Ravens since 2019 have been 29-15 ATS with Jackson quarterbacking them on the road, 17-7 ATS on the road with a line between -4 and +4, 19-10-1 ATS on the road (25-5 ATS in six point teasers) versus non-divisional opponents, including 4-0-1 ATS, 5-0 straight up if they are on the road off a loss versus a non-divisional opponent.
1) AD and t:wins = 3 and week = 12 and DIV and tS(W@A, N=3)<2 and o:wins<7
16-5 ATS....ON Patriots
2) Ravens since 2019 have been 29-15 ATS with Jackson quarterbacking them on the road, 17-7 ATS on the road with a line between -4 and +4, 19-10-1 ATS on the road (25-5 ATS in six point teasers) versus non-divisional opponents, including 4-0-1 ATS, 5-0 straight up if they are on the road off a loss versus a non-divisional opponent.
I get Bal and the NYG in Dec and nothing on the dog
I get Bal and the NYG in Dec and nothing on the dog
Just reran it and you are right..Some weird glitch, I do not know why it showed differently twice.
Just reran it and you are right..Some weird glitch, I do not know why it showed differently twice.
Good thought I was losing it buddy.
Good thought I was losing it buddy.
Interested to hear some on your methodology, especially your anchors.
I understand they are regression based. But regressing to what and over how many games? Cleveland this week for example. What are you looking at that makes them an anchor? I assume it is because Pittsburgh is in a regression spot. But what criteria makes them in a regression?
Interested to hear some on your methodology, especially your anchors.
I understand they are regression based. But regressing to what and over how many games? Cleveland this week for example. What are you looking at that makes them an anchor? I assume it is because Pittsburgh is in a regression spot. But what criteria makes them in a regression?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.