i got +8900-5225= (+3675) but i did not count week 10 1st loser ( could not tell if + or -) regardless it is a nice year for you (of course those numbers are at 1x) thanks for posting but am bit slow and find it hard to keep up with all the reading .... but you do well and i thank you for it .... good luck rest the year
goldfinger 1964
1
i got +8900-5225= (+3675) but i did not count week 10 1st loser ( could not tell if + or -) regardless it is a nice year for you (of course those numbers are at 1x) thanks for posting but am bit slow and find it hard to keep up with all the reading .... but you do well and i thank you for it .... good luck rest the year
but i did not count week 10 1st loser ( could not tell if + or -)
regardless it is a nice year for you
(of course those numbers are at 1x)
thanks for posting but am bit slow and find it hard to keep up with all the reading ....
but you do well and i thank you for it .... good luck rest the year
@PUSSYGALORE333
Hello PG! Hope you're enjoying the season!
Ooops! Yep, that Week 10 loser was Ravens -4 -140 ... Thanks!I'll correct that typo in my Weekly chart after tonight's result to finish Week 14.
With 89 wins (no plus money and only scoring every win for +1.0 unit) the +8900 is accurate.
But upon further review, the sum of all my losses is actually worse than your calculations (-5225 plus the missing -140) and I get -5565 ...prior to MNF...although this looks like it may fall another -300 the way the Cowgirls allow Burrow to pass easily
So (+8900) vs (-5565) ...with MNF -300 pending
My 26 - 8 *Best Bets checks out
1
Quote Originally Posted by PUSSYGALORE333:
i got +8900-5225= (+3675)
but i did not count week 10 1st loser ( could not tell if + or -)
regardless it is a nice year for you
(of course those numbers are at 1x)
thanks for posting but am bit slow and find it hard to keep up with all the reading ....
but you do well and i thank you for it .... good luck rest the year
@PUSSYGALORE333
Hello PG! Hope you're enjoying the season!
Ooops! Yep, that Week 10 loser was Ravens -4 -140 ... Thanks!I'll correct that typo in my Weekly chart after tonight's result to finish Week 14.
With 89 wins (no plus money and only scoring every win for +1.0 unit) the +8900 is accurate.
But upon further review, the sum of all my losses is actually worse than your calculations (-5225 plus the missing -140) and I get -5565 ...prior to MNF...although this looks like it may fall another -300 the way the Cowgirls allow Burrow to pass easily
W PACKERS +4 -132 W Late 1Q, Miami lead 6 - 3..driving again...LIVE BET: Dolphins -360 *BB LLIVE hedge BET: Jets +150 W Dolphins have the momentum and the ball in OT! LIVE BET: Dolphins -200 W Late 2Q leading 17 - 14, driving! OK.....RAMS +4.5 -225 *BB W no score early 1Q, Cinci punts...LIVE BET: Dallas +10.5 -300 *BB
= 5 - 1 (3 - 0*Best Bets)
1
Week 14 results...
W PACKERS +4 -132 W Late 1Q, Miami lead 6 - 3..driving again...LIVE BET: Dolphins -360 *BB LLIVE hedge BET: Jets +150 W Dolphins have the momentum and the ball in OT! LIVE BET: Dolphins -200 W Late 2Q leading 17 - 14, driving! OK.....RAMS +4.5 -225 *BB W no score early 1Q, Cinci punts...LIVE BET: Dallas +10.5 -300 *BB
When I look only at upcoming games where one team lines up to hold MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, the past 4 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results:
Teams I circled:
Week 11: 7 - 1 su Week 12: 6 - 3 su Week 13: 10 - 1 su Week 14: 7 - 1 su >>>>> = 30 - 6 su(only 18 - 16 - 2 ats)
I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 36 - 12 in this 4 week time frame, whereby 5 of those 12 losses were "in-game hedge bets" and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit at an 85% rate (36 - 6) utilizing those stats! Had I bet ATS, it would have been a wash...
This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 9 teams circled which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent.
I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds!
1
When I look only at upcoming games where one team lines up to hold MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, the past 4 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results:
Teams I circled:
Week 11: 7 - 1 su Week 12: 6 - 3 su Week 13: 10 - 1 su Week 14: 7 - 1 su >>>>> = 30 - 6 su(only 18 - 16 - 2 ats)
I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 36 - 12 in this 4 week time frame, whereby 5 of those 12 losses were "in-game hedge bets" and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit at an 85% rate (36 - 6) utilizing those stats! Had I bet ATS, it would have been a wash...
This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 9 teams circled which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent.
I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds!
Ranking the 2025 Draft Derby "race for the bottom":
Which teams are going to "accidentally" light up the board with low percentage plays, untimely blitzes, foolish 4th down gambles, dropped passes, fumbles, and missed tackles?
Giants have the least stressful path to "accidentally"lose their 4 remaining games to claim the first draft pick! - since they have no beatable opps and there would be no shame to losing on homefield to Ravens or even Colts.
**Interesting note: The awful Jets face the awful Jags. But unfortunately only one of them can gain the benefit of a LOSS!LOL
2 - 11 NYG (Balt, @ATLA, Indy, @PHIL) 2 - 11 Raiders (have 3 HOME games to try and lose in front of their fans!)
3 - 10 **Aaron Rodgers 3 - 10 **Jags (with new QB, Mac Jones!) 3 - 10 Tom Brady's old team 3 - 10 Charlie Browns 3 - 10 Titans 3 - 10 Carolina
1
Lose is MORE!!!
Ranking the 2025 Draft Derby "race for the bottom":
Which teams are going to "accidentally" light up the board with low percentage plays, untimely blitzes, foolish 4th down gambles, dropped passes, fumbles, and missed tackles?
Giants have the least stressful path to "accidentally"lose their 4 remaining games to claim the first draft pick! - since they have no beatable opps and there would be no shame to losing on homefield to Ravens or even Colts.
**Interesting note: The awful Jets face the awful Jags. But unfortunately only one of them can gain the benefit of a LOSS!LOL
2 - 11 NYG (Balt, @ATLA, Indy, @PHIL) 2 - 11 Raiders (have 3 HOME games to try and lose in front of their fans!)
3 - 10 **Aaron Rodgers 3 - 10 **Jags (with new QB, Mac Jones!) 3 - 10 Tom Brady's old team 3 - 10 Charlie Browns 3 - 10 Titans 3 - 10 Carolina
Ranking the BEST point differential teams!(mean avg per game ) +14.0 Jared Goff & gang!! +9.9 Buffy! +8.3 Eagles +7.6 Vikings +6.5 Russell Wilson+6.2 Commandos
wow the chargers fell out pretty fast
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Ranking the BEST point differential teams!(mean avg per game ) +14.0 Jared Goff & gang!! +9.9 Buffy! +8.3 Eagles +7.6 Vikings +6.5 Russell Wilson+6.2 Commandos
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ranking the BEST point differential teams!(mean avg per game ) +14.0 Jared Goff & gang!! +9.9 Buffy! +8.3 Eagles +7.6 Vikings +6.5 Russell Wilson+6.2 Commandos wow the chargers fell out pretty fast
Yeah. They were avg 27 PPG for a long 5 game stretch before the 2 recent road games where they scored just 17 each.
But with 2 HOME games due up next followed by 2 roadies against BAD opponents, I expect their numbers will climb again!
1
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ranking the BEST point differential teams!(mean avg per game ) +14.0 Jared Goff & gang!! +9.9 Buffy! +8.3 Eagles +7.6 Vikings +6.5 Russell Wilson+6.2 Commandos wow the chargers fell out pretty fast
Yeah. They were avg 27 PPG for a long 5 game stretch before the 2 recent road games where they scored just 17 each.
But with 2 HOME games due up next followed by 2 roadies against BAD opponents, I expect their numbers will climb again!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.