Look - I am going to post this and then end any interaction with this guy or his threads, and not respond to others either.... Think to yourself - why would someone post these absurd lines, with absurd vig - and only track the RECORD?Does this guy sound like a guy who wants to help the forum?When asked about method or reasoning, do his answers sound legit and like from someone who has clearly thought this through? If SportsTuition wants to post here with no reference to his affiliated pay site - then fine. No issues. But he claims transparency - and he is not transparent. If you have been here long enough, you have seen this play out in one form or another dozens of times. I just happen to hate the pay for picks model - those people do not bet their own picks because selling picks you actually bet is counter productive. You are killing your own opportunities by doing so, and can make MUCH more money betting than selling. There is a very small pool of fish that are being fought over by the hundreds of touts. I want this forum to be a sharing of information that helps people win. There are very few places where this exists anymore - everything is a pick. So what triggered me is his answers to paying for juice like he does. It makes zero sense. It defies math. Profitability should matter over record. OK, now carry on SportsTuition.
This is at least the 2nd time you post this Van . When will it be the next one ? LOL
God , Family and beer . That's all that matters
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Look - I am going to post this and then end any interaction with this guy or his threads, and not respond to others either.... Think to yourself - why would someone post these absurd lines, with absurd vig - and only track the RECORD?Does this guy sound like a guy who wants to help the forum?When asked about method or reasoning, do his answers sound legit and like from someone who has clearly thought this through? If SportsTuition wants to post here with no reference to his affiliated pay site - then fine. No issues. But he claims transparency - and he is not transparent. If you have been here long enough, you have seen this play out in one form or another dozens of times. I just happen to hate the pay for picks model - those people do not bet their own picks because selling picks you actually bet is counter productive. You are killing your own opportunities by doing so, and can make MUCH more money betting than selling. There is a very small pool of fish that are being fought over by the hundreds of touts. I want this forum to be a sharing of information that helps people win. There are very few places where this exists anymore - everything is a pick. So what triggered me is his answers to paying for juice like he does. It makes zero sense. It defies math. Profitability should matter over record. OK, now carry on SportsTuition.
This is at least the 2nd time you post this Van . When will it be the next one ? LOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.