Wow. I had no idea FL was so strict. I know BetUS has live lines. So does Nitrogen Sports (although they only take crypto as a form of payment). I'm not sure if Intertops has live wagering, but you can always check. Of the 3, I'd say BetUS is closest in similarity with BetNow, but that may also mean their terms of service may also be similar.
-- Take a leap of faith
0
@jimmyc33030
Wow. I had no idea FL was so strict. I know BetUS has live lines. So does Nitrogen Sports (although they only take crypto as a form of payment). I'm not sure if Intertops has live wagering, but you can always check. Of the 3, I'd say BetUS is closest in similarity with BetNow, but that may also mean their terms of service may also be similar.
I was surprised too. First time I heard that. I¡¯ll check out your other recommendations. Been busy with work and GC remodeling our house I haven¡¯t had to time to fart. Thanks for your pic last night. I got lucky The first quarter paid cause I fell asleep checked the score in the morning. Thanks Froggy80
1
@Froggy80
I was surprised too. First time I heard that. I¡¯ll check out your other recommendations. Been busy with work and GC remodeling our house I haven¡¯t had to time to fart. Thanks for your pic last night. I got lucky The first quarter paid cause I fell asleep checked the score in the morning. Thanks Froggy80
The answer is a tentative 'yes', but it looks like you're new to the thread. I would suggest reading the first 3 posts on this thread to get familiar with the system unless you have already and already understand how it works.
-- Take a leap of faith
0
@F82ghost
The answer is a tentative 'yes', but it looks like you're new to the thread. I would suggest reading the first 3 posts on this thread to get familiar with the system unless you have already and already understand how it works.
I'm looking into a player prop system based on several factors:
Anticipated pace of game advantage/disadvantage
Fatigue/Rest
Average pace of past 4-weeks of match-ups to gauge if there should be a clear advantage against the book's line
The thought process is this:
A fast paced game will allow for more opportunities and thus should encourage us to lean on the over for player props. For example, if Houston Rockets (fastest pace this season) vs. Philadelphia (slowest pace this season) were facing off, then naturally Rockets props should lean on the under because their players will have less than the average number of opportunities due to their opponents dragging the pace of the game down. On the flip side, Philadelphia props should lean on the over in terms of player props due to the anticipated increase in pace.
Fatigue/Rest can be used to complement a pick. Rest + Increasing pace should provide an edge on the over and Fatigue + Decreasing pace should provide an edge on the under.
The Average 4-week pace factor will indicate whether the line is based on an increase in pace situation or a decrease in pace. This should allow us to see if the current lines are over-leaning in one direction or not. Clearly defining these edges should in theory help us not get trapped into a prop bet that's already factoring in a pace differential. An example of this is team like Houston or Philadelphia.
If in the last 4 weeks, Philadelphia was facing NYK, Miami, Dallas, Toronto, and Boston (lowest paces in the league), then the player props would have adjusted to a very low pace environment. Then today, if they're facing Houston, we can define a clear edge against the book. Vice versa would also be true when factoring in Houston's past 4-weeks of matchups.
It's a work in progress. I'm testing a bunch of ideas, but I really do like player props... much more than game props because there are so many really great opportunities.
-- Take a leap of faith
2
I'm looking into a player prop system based on several factors:
Anticipated pace of game advantage/disadvantage
Fatigue/Rest
Average pace of past 4-weeks of match-ups to gauge if there should be a clear advantage against the book's line
The thought process is this:
A fast paced game will allow for more opportunities and thus should encourage us to lean on the over for player props. For example, if Houston Rockets (fastest pace this season) vs. Philadelphia (slowest pace this season) were facing off, then naturally Rockets props should lean on the under because their players will have less than the average number of opportunities due to their opponents dragging the pace of the game down. On the flip side, Philadelphia props should lean on the over in terms of player props due to the anticipated increase in pace.
Fatigue/Rest can be used to complement a pick. Rest + Increasing pace should provide an edge on the over and Fatigue + Decreasing pace should provide an edge on the under.
The Average 4-week pace factor will indicate whether the line is based on an increase in pace situation or a decrease in pace. This should allow us to see if the current lines are over-leaning in one direction or not. Clearly defining these edges should in theory help us not get trapped into a prop bet that's already factoring in a pace differential. An example of this is team like Houston or Philadelphia.
If in the last 4 weeks, Philadelphia was facing NYK, Miami, Dallas, Toronto, and Boston (lowest paces in the league), then the player props would have adjusted to a very low pace environment. Then today, if they're facing Houston, we can define a clear edge against the book. Vice versa would also be true when factoring in Houston's past 4-weeks of matchups.
It's a work in progress. I'm testing a bunch of ideas, but I really do like player props... much more than game props because there are so many really great opportunities.
FWIW, I'll be doubling down on the 4Q gas system when the next opportunity presents itself. There hasn't been a 3rd consecutive loss for 3 seasons. It's not fool-proof, but I'm just being transparent.
Quarter Method
Record: 11 - 0
4Q Gas System
Record: 1 - 2
-- Take a leap of faith
1
FWIW, I'll be doubling down on the 4Q gas system when the next opportunity presents itself. There hasn't been a 3rd consecutive loss for 3 seasons. It's not fool-proof, but I'm just being transparent.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.