Sienna -8.5 $$$$
Pending | 2 Team Parlay | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 7:05pm NBA Basketball 502 New Orleans Pelicans -2 -110* vs Utah Jazz | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 8:35pm NBA Basketball 512 San Antonio Spurs -2 -950* vs Sacramento Kings |
Pending | 2 Team Parlay | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 7:05pm NBA Basketball 502 New Orleans Pelicans -2 -110* vs Utah Jazz | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 8:35pm NBA Basketball 512 San Antonio Spurs -2 -950* vs Sacramento Kings |
Pending | 3 Team Parlay | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 12:00pm College Basketball 521 Seton Hall -8 -110* vs DePaul | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 4:00pm College Basketball 568 UTEP -12 -140* vs Texas San Antonio | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 5:00pm College Basketball 587 Boise State -10 -110* vs San Jose State |
Pending | 3 Team Parlay | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 12:00pm College Basketball 521 Seton Hall -8 -110* vs DePaul | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 4:00pm College Basketball 568 UTEP -12 -140* vs Texas San Antonio | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 5:00pm College Basketball 587 Boise State -10 -110* vs San Jose State |
Pending | 5 Team Parlay | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 1:00pm College Basketball 531 Oklahoma U -12 -120* vs TCU | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 12:00pm College Basketball 650 Wisc Green Bay -10 -110* vs Cleveland State | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 2:30pm College Basketball 652 Wisc Milwaukee -9 -110* vs Northern Kentucky | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 5:00pm College Basketball 654 Wright State -12 -110* vs Illinois Chicago | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 12:00pm College Basketball 690 Tennessee Chattanooga -9 -110* vs Samford |
Pending | 5 Team Parlay | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 1:00pm College Basketball 531 Oklahoma U -12 -120* vs TCU | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 12:00pm College Basketball 650 Wisc Green Bay -10 -110* vs Cleveland State | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 2:30pm College Basketball 652 Wisc Milwaukee -9 -110* vs Northern Kentucky | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 5:00pm College Basketball 654 Wright State -12 -110* vs Illinois Chicago | ||||
Pending | 3/5/16 12:00pm College Basketball 690 Tennessee Chattanooga -9 -110* vs Samford |
Getting this one down early.
$$$$ = Cal (-3.5) over Arizona State
Cal is a Sweet 16 team. Maybe even Elite 18. ASU is an NIT team if they are lucky. Since Cal became "whole" (meaning since their leader and point guard Tyrone Wallace came back), they have been easily the best team in the Pac-12. They had a rough loss on Thursday at Arizona, but, they had that game won if Gabe York hadn't buried 3-stright 3-pointers in the last few minutes to turn a 6-point lead into a loss. Had York missed any of those, we would be talking about a Cal team that has steamrolled the entire Pac-12 and won 8 in a row. I think the fact they lost and ASU won on Thursday turned this line from an 8-pt spread into a 3.5-pt spread. I will gladly take that line and go with it.
There will be a lot of "TRAP LINE" talk around these boards all day Saturday, but a trap line is in the eye of the beholder and they hit at a 50-50 rate. The last Pac-12 "trap line" was Oregon State and they got beat down by USC. I don't look at line movements and what other people say are traps. I bet based on what I watch and what I know. I know Cal and ASU and I think Cal is a far better team in this spot.
ASU is down to just two decent bench players, and calling them "decent" is being nice. Cal has 3 or 4 NBA players on their roster while ASU has nobody close. Cal has so much length and athleticism that ASU is going to have a horrible time trying to score inside of 15 feet and even Cal's guards have a large length advantage over ASU's, so the Devil guards will have a hard time getting open shots too. I think Wallace and Bird take advantage of their counterparts and just light up ASU while Rabb dominates the middle, like he did against Arizona, even though Arizona's paint players are faaaaar better than ASU's. ASU's depleted squad may keep it close for a little while, but Cal pulls away for a double-digit win.
Good luck today everyone.
Getting this one down early.
$$$$ = Cal (-3.5) over Arizona State
Cal is a Sweet 16 team. Maybe even Elite 18. ASU is an NIT team if they are lucky. Since Cal became "whole" (meaning since their leader and point guard Tyrone Wallace came back), they have been easily the best team in the Pac-12. They had a rough loss on Thursday at Arizona, but, they had that game won if Gabe York hadn't buried 3-stright 3-pointers in the last few minutes to turn a 6-point lead into a loss. Had York missed any of those, we would be talking about a Cal team that has steamrolled the entire Pac-12 and won 8 in a row. I think the fact they lost and ASU won on Thursday turned this line from an 8-pt spread into a 3.5-pt spread. I will gladly take that line and go with it.
There will be a lot of "TRAP LINE" talk around these boards all day Saturday, but a trap line is in the eye of the beholder and they hit at a 50-50 rate. The last Pac-12 "trap line" was Oregon State and they got beat down by USC. I don't look at line movements and what other people say are traps. I bet based on what I watch and what I know. I know Cal and ASU and I think Cal is a far better team in this spot.
ASU is down to just two decent bench players, and calling them "decent" is being nice. Cal has 3 or 4 NBA players on their roster while ASU has nobody close. Cal has so much length and athleticism that ASU is going to have a horrible time trying to score inside of 15 feet and even Cal's guards have a large length advantage over ASU's, so the Devil guards will have a hard time getting open shots too. I think Wallace and Bird take advantage of their counterparts and just light up ASU while Rabb dominates the middle, like he did against Arizona, even though Arizona's paint players are faaaaar better than ASU's. ASU's depleted squad may keep it close for a little while, but Cal pulls away for a double-digit win.
Good luck today everyone.
Money play Chelsea FC vs Stoke City FC (Eng Premier) O2.5
Im just taking a simple angle here. In these 2 teams last 10 games, 9 of them has seen 3 goals or more. In their past 2 meetings the total has failed to reach 3. It's time for a better scoring game. Most predictions have this a draw, I'm taking a shot
OVER 2.5 Total
Money play Chelsea FC vs Stoke City FC (Eng Premier) O2.5
Im just taking a simple angle here. In these 2 teams last 10 games, 9 of them has seen 3 goals or more. In their past 2 meetings the total has failed to reach 3. It's time for a better scoring game. Most predictions have this a draw, I'm taking a shot
OVER 2.5 Total
Mar 05 | ||
Mar 05 | ||
Mar 05 | ||
Mar 05 | NHL [6] TOTAL u5?-130 (CAL FLAMES vrs PIT PENGUINS) (JRENO system play) | |
Mar 05 | (LOVE THIS PLAY) | |
Risking 100 USD To Win 654 USD |
Mar 05 | ||
Mar 05 | ||
Mar 05 | ||
Mar 05 | NHL [6] TOTAL u5?-130 (CAL FLAMES vrs PIT PENGUINS) (JRENO system play) | |
Mar 05 | (LOVE THIS PLAY) | |
Risking 100 USD To Win 654 USD |
Thanks man! 2-0 is a great start! Keep it up!
Thanks man! 2-0 is a great start! Keep it up!
Yeah, beardown, you have 4 already this week. That is a good writeup and I am sure everyone can use it, but it wont be tracked. You are 4-0 this week, so you can't do better than that!
Yeah, beardown, you have 4 already this week. That is a good writeup and I am sure everyone can use it, but it wont be tracked. You are 4-0 this week, so you can't do better than that!
We, I have mentioned this before, but this is just one message board on the internet. If you think that because you see "everyone" (which is really about 10 people) on a play, that it is somehow going to affect how the game is played, then that's some questionable thinking. You might go over to ESPN right now and see that "everyone" on that board is on ASU, so then that would mean that Cal is the play if you hang out on ESPN?
We have had this exact same conversation twice this week and both times the play that "everyone was on" was an easy winner. I know people like to play against "everyone", but remember that your perception of "everyone" is based on what you have read on one message board in a tiny corner of the internet. A person's definition of "everyone" is in their own perception.
Best of luck on whatever you play....
We, I have mentioned this before, but this is just one message board on the internet. If you think that because you see "everyone" (which is really about 10 people) on a play, that it is somehow going to affect how the game is played, then that's some questionable thinking. You might go over to ESPN right now and see that "everyone" on that board is on ASU, so then that would mean that Cal is the play if you hang out on ESPN?
We have had this exact same conversation twice this week and both times the play that "everyone was on" was an easy winner. I know people like to play against "everyone", but remember that your perception of "everyone" is based on what you have read on one message board in a tiny corner of the internet. A person's definition of "everyone" is in their own perception.
Best of luck on whatever you play....
I actually think the line is solid. USC is badass at home and Oregon is locked into the #1 seed in the Pac-12 Tourney, so they get the 1, win or lose. Oregon is not very good on the road and they looked really bad at UCLA. Either team can win this game. If the line keeps climbing, though, I may go with USC. I don't have a problem with it being a tight line at all. Does not seem fishy to me.
I actually think the line is solid. USC is badass at home and Oregon is locked into the #1 seed in the Pac-12 Tourney, so they get the 1, win or lose. Oregon is not very good on the road and they looked really bad at UCLA. Either team can win this game. If the line keeps climbing, though, I may go with USC. I don't have a problem with it being a tight line at all. Does not seem fishy to me.
I agree with this
I agree with this
We, I have mentioned this before, but this is just one message board on the internet. If you think that because you see "everyone" (which is really about 10 people) on a play, that it is somehow going to affect how the game is played, then that's some questionable thinking. You might go over to ESPN right now and see that "everyone" on that board is on ASU, so then that would mean that Cal is the play if you hang out on ESPN?
We have had this exact same conversation twice this week and both times the play that "everyone was on" was an easy winner. I know people like to play against "everyone", but remember that your perception of "everyone" is based on what you have read on one message board in a tiny corner of the internet. A person's definition of "everyone" is in their own perception.
Best of luck on whatever you play....
We, I have mentioned this before, but this is just one message board on the internet. If you think that because you see "everyone" (which is really about 10 people) on a play, that it is somehow going to affect how the game is played, then that's some questionable thinking. You might go over to ESPN right now and see that "everyone" on that board is on ASU, so then that would mean that Cal is the play if you hang out on ESPN?
We have had this exact same conversation twice this week and both times the play that "everyone was on" was an easy winner. I know people like to play against "everyone", but remember that your perception of "everyone" is based on what you have read on one message board in a tiny corner of the internet. A person's definition of "everyone" is in their own perception.
Best of luck on whatever you play....
I would live to do this, but when I post the thread, there are still over 10 $$$$'s still open. Unless I wait to post the thread the next day, there is no way I could do that. Plus, it takes a really long time to input and sort and re-type the standings. I am about to get started on it in a little while and its only 7:51 AM on a Saturday where I live. If I was getting aid to do this, I could maybe figure out a way to do it, but I am doing it all for free and on my own time and often it is not my #1 priority for the day. It would be great to have the Standings there as the 2nd post every day, but 90% of the time there are still several undecided $$$$'s, so an incomplete Standings page is pretty useless. Also, I just don't have the time to be on top of it at every second. Got a lot to do......
I would live to do this, but when I post the thread, there are still over 10 $$$$'s still open. Unless I wait to post the thread the next day, there is no way I could do that. Plus, it takes a really long time to input and sort and re-type the standings. I am about to get started on it in a little while and its only 7:51 AM on a Saturday where I live. If I was getting aid to do this, I could maybe figure out a way to do it, but I am doing it all for free and on my own time and often it is not my #1 priority for the day. It would be great to have the Standings there as the 2nd post every day, but 90% of the time there are still several undecided $$$$'s, so an incomplete Standings page is pretty useless. Also, I just don't have the time to be on top of it at every second. Got a lot to do......
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.