WilliamLagosII

@captainandcoke4

 I was having the same problem earlier with a different game and I went to the "Help Forum" ,and my man Flynt got it taken care of.

@DeezyAZ81

 Ya I saw that the #4 guy (ravenecw) in the monthly for Streak Survivor has his Creighton win still pending.

Ha,I don't know if you were the 1 who was able to put it back on the list of games that contestants are able to pick from (even though the odds are at -142 right now).If you were I do appreciate it,and now it's like it never happened.Thanks,and have a great weekend Flynt.

Thanks,now if you could make Edmonton my pick for today.Cause after it was available all night,now it's been removed from the selections.All will be good and it will be like it never happened.

Could you guys grade all the picks in Streak Survivor for games that were played yesterday March 17th so I can make a pick today.I picked Washington-St Louis over 6.5 and the results are still pending,so I can't make a pick on today's games.

Good call guy.

@GypsyCowboy

 Wow, thanks for that info Einstein, if you actually read my 1st post that's all explained. But that's not what happened on the day I'm talking about. On that day there were 3 sports going on and not a game had been played in any of them, it was like 5pm and all of them had games starting pretty late. But this contestant was able to pick 3 hockey games at -150,-150 and -120, without picking from 1 of the 3 sports. 

@TIPOF-THE-SWORD

 I understand that way of thinking also Tipof. There is a reason they have it where you can't pick all in 1 sport and are supposed to pick 1 in every sport available, cause they know there is an advantage to taking 2 hockey games that are at -150, and 1 hockey game at -120. That's their rules, that's why i don't think it was right that day when they only put up the hockey and NBA basketball games, but didn't to put up the college basketball games till later, which let contestants avoid "their rules". Now to be honest I will check to see when is the latest game that starts in a sport, and if I don't like any games in the sport. I will wait until all the games have started where I can't pick in that sport anymore, and choose a game in a sport that is still available, but that I have already made a pick in. Like on a Monday if I don't like the NFL game I will make my 3 other picks, but wait until the only NFL game starts and becomes unavailable, and then make another pick in a sport I have already make a pick in. And that's kind of skirting the rule also, but I'm also only getting to select from a very limited amount of games. And let me clarify, like I said in my post #3 I'm not complaining against Seawep doing it, I would do the same thing if given the chance. I just don't think Covers should of given any contestants the chance to skirt "their" own rules, even if it is a free contest. It ain't hard to keep it fair, and just cause it's free, doesn't mean it can't still be fair to everyone.

@DeaconBlues2525

 Ya i figured it was just broken at the present time,I remember the last time they had the race you could see what everybody had picked. Good job on the race so far Deacon, and good luck going forward.

@Captain Lock

 Ya, it don't let me check any previous picks either besides what someone picks for the day it is. If you go to the main page and click view under their profile it will list what picks each contestant has made for that day only.

@magicman1642

 Ya,I understand every rule. Did you read my post #3 about if you are going to run a contest where everyone has to pick a game from each sport, that you should put all the sports that are going to have a game that day up at that same time.I understand if I was making my picks when it was 1st put up, like he was I could done the same thing (exactly like I said in post #3). But that's only for contestants who happen to be watching on Covers at the exact same time as they put up only 2 out of the 3 leagues who are playing games today. Every other contestant who isn't watching for when they only put up 2 of the leagues, is at a disadvantage of having to make picks from all the leagues.

@BrazenBurrow

 Must be nice, I'm not blaming you or Seawep, I would do the same thing if given the chance. But if you are going to run a contest where everybody has to pick a game from each sport, why leave out one of the sports when you are posting all the games. You're giving some contestants a distinct advantage over everybody else.

How does Seawep 95 have 3 NHL games picked for tonights Dec 9th games,when it's 5 PM.Why doesn't he have to pick a college basketball game,he has plenty to choose from?I realize when a league has no games to pick cause all the games have already started,you can pick multiple games from a particular league.But the only way he could of done what he did,is if Covers put out only NHL and NBA games,and then waited to post NCAAB games till later,that's kinda BS.

@bucfan64

 i could see where you are pissed if you had 2 g's on it. I only had a 100 on it and I'm pissed,a 100 ain't going to break me either way. But it's just the principle of it, how do I go and try and cap games and keep betting on this crap knowing these officials can basically do or call anything they want,to get the result they want. First you can't hit the QB low,then you can't make contact with his head,now you can't even say something to him.

@Martylee

 The flag was for abusive language to an opponent.

@bucfan64

 Yep,now we got games being decided by a officials judgement call whether or not if it's just trash talk,or if it's the dreaded "abusive language to an opponent".Pretty soon the refs are going to have to huddle up,and between the bunch of them their going to decide if what someone SAID,offended another player,or really offended another player.You can't tell me that this was the only time all game,that a player said something to another player,and it just so happens it was on a 3rd down play that would of ended the game winning drive.What's next are they going to start calling penalties for "staring down an opponent?"

The officials are saying they called a penalty on Jones that gave the Colts the game, "Abusive language towards an opponent",now football games are decided by "Abusive language towards an opponent".Oh,and it just so happens that 80% of the money was on KC,imagine that.

The whole game was shady,but to determine the winner of the game because somebody said something to somebody.Tell me other players during the game didn't  swear at another player,c'mon.They make every call a judgement call PI,taunting,they can't even definitively determine what's a god dam catch.Now their going to determine the outcome of games by what's SAID on the field.

Am I hearing this right,they threw a mis-conduct penalty that gave Indy a 1st down after they didn't convert on 3rd down to prolong the game winning drive.Cause a Chiefs player said something to Matt Ryan?