the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people

fbi coming for terrorist rumplickers   

NYT sold the Iraq invasion to the American people.  

Along with Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Bush and Cheney. 

They buried any of their journalists that questioned the WMD narrative and promoted any journalist that pushed for the invasion. 

Maybe because Twitter is an American company, and Dorsey does not give 2 $hits what happens in Iran because it does not impact him or the majority of his platform's users in any way? 

Not that hard to figure out. 

biden and clinton did not sell the iraq invasion to the american people .thats a lie .

they followed their president in a time after being attacked and supported bush and so did i and 95% americans

and the invasion was always questioned , befor during and after ,never buried . bush/cheney just screamed louder .

the duelfer report exposed the errors in the run up to war in iraq .not justified

finding binladen terrorists and executing them for 9/11 = justified

thats a fact  

A company can stop some speech upon its property ok. But at what point do we the dumbest nation of the industrialized world begin to state that this information is too sensitive or that the uneducated masses should not be aware of this type of information.

Who decides this protocol. People? People are corrupt sinners who devise strategies to hold power and this possibly is the most effective tool ever allowed. 

Freedom of speech is a contradiction in terms of any true freedom and spoken or written word even Hume acknowledged the challenge to print the truth but not offend the powers who rule and keep it from being so dry that it becomes instant boredom.

At some point we must hear what the other side is saying without the spin of the ruling elite.

AS far as organic Intelligence. Our technology as humans on this planet not necessarily developed in the stupidest nation on the planet have evolved to organic wet ware systems.

At some point this keep thinking as a 5th grader to protect them from the truth has been a colossal failure in our public education.

Reference wetware.

A team of researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) recently announced that they have made a groundbreaking discovery that could one day allow us to develop much faster and more efficient computers. In a study published in the ACS Applied Nano Materials peer-reviewed journal, the researchers describe a method that uses a virus to create a better type of computer memory.

The idea revolves around reducing the millisecond time delays that occur during the transfer and storage of information between a traditional random access memory (RAM) chip and a hard drive. Previously, researchers have tried to achieve this by introducing phase-change memory, which can switch between amorphous and crystalline states by using a binary-type material like gallium antimonide. This allows phase-change memory to have a higher storage capacity than a hard drive, while being able to achieve the same speeds as a RAM chip. However, the problem with gallium antimonide is that it increases power consumption and has a tendency to undergo material separation at temperatures of around 345 degrees Celsius. The current process of manufacturing integrated circuits can reach temperatures of nearly 400 degrees Celsius.

¡°Our research team has found a way to overcome this major roadblock using tiny wire technology,¡± explains Assistant Prof Desmond Loke from SUTD. Using a virus known as M13 bacteriophage, the researchers were able to achieve a low-temperature construction of tiny germanium-tin-oxide wires and memory, which could enable future computers to reach speeds we can only dream about today. According to Loke, ¡°this possibility leads the way to the elimination of the millisecond storage and transfer delays needed to progress modern computing.¡±

roger that

He hasn't said Twitter doesn't condone violence, and put in place tools to curb and halt inciting violence on his platform? You are just rambling to ramble and support Trump at this point. Your point is weak. That isn't an excuse, but fact. Pretty sure an American social media CEO holds the President of the U.S. to the highest standard on his platform. Not that hard to figure out. 

AS your side so eloquently about election fraud.

Prove it.

Because I have yet to have anything outside of trumps usual rhetoric. I don't have break into the capital and hang Mike Pence in any form of written or spoken statement.  I don't have break8nto the building and sack that place in any form of statement written or oral. 

I don't have any proof that our president state turn to violence. I do have Trump in a 6 minute video state my true supporters would not....

But if you have a smoking gun here by all means 

Show here he said this that resulted in that and again to a moral certainty that a judge can say I'll take it to the grave even if results in civil war and stand on the verdict....

Example.

If trumps speech can be construed as this aggrevious. 

Then this can be argued equally aggrevious. 

https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-must-fight-protect-our-democracy-way-republicans-fight-destroy-it-opinion-1544041

(Pascal was such an easy language to program in a series of if then statements turned to an exe program. )

        Good points.  And you are correct!

I know. You don't typically make a point. 

You should be concerned with why the POTUS is so reliant on Twitter to communicate with the public, and the type of lies he consistently spews, but you are not of course. 

We are obsessed with Trump? Are you braindead? He kind of holds an important position in this country and the global system as the POTUS no?

He is going to be talked about. No $hit Sherlock. 

Equal Penalties for all? No. Geezus you are dumb. 

Twitter does not care what your dumb A$$ tweets, but might be concerned about the POTUS with 100 million followers, and the amount of social and political power he holds.  You are not very bright. 

The SUBJECT matter involves President Trump. I seriously did not think it was possible to be that dumb. Have fun debating yourself. 

I know you are shaking not being able to follow the tweets of your Supreme Leader anymore. 

Why you are bringing up the Ayatollah of Iran up on the matter? Does he have years of countless tweets on his feed that are viewed as stoking fear, violence, and division in comparison to Trump? I doubt Twitter's ban of Trump was based on one tweet, but rather a track record of this nonsense for years. At some point, it is likely the CEO said enough is enough. Why is this so hard for you to understand? 

Cheers. 

No I live with my mom like the Q'Anon Shahman. 

And you proved another one of my points. Again,amazing! 

I think the answer is pretty clear if you can read between the lines in my posts, which of course you cannot because you lack critical thinking skills.

Here is a direct answer for your simple mind. YES. Inciting violence should be banned on Twitter. Are you slow?

This is why Trump's account was banned. 

You can't help yourself from being an assh ole can you. You could have just said yes and been done with it. But that ain't you. Your the kind of guy that absolutely  has to have the last word and be right about everything. Have you ever been wrong about anything? Carry on with your self righteous life. Now, watch, you'll prove yet another point within minutes. You know you have to. Hilarious, snowflake!