The law prohibits DOJ from discussing a search warrant that is under seal. Secrecy rules are designed to protect the person under investigation. You know who could discuss it? Donald Trump, who would have received a copy of the inventory of items seized. Does anyone think that if Trump believed presenting the warrant would help him, legitimately or otherwise, he wouldn't? He would be blasting the details all over. And he is not. Just give that a little thought...
I find it strange that I haven't heard Ivanka or Jared say anything yet.Dumb and Dumber(eric and junior)have said something about it,but i haven't heard anything from the kushner's yet.
What kind of strikes me is the way eric said "You know they broke into a safe.He didn't even have anything in the safe".I would bet they did find something in the safe,but eric's gonna try and get ahead of that story by saying nothing was in there.Then when they do disclose that they found whatever in the safe.He can say i told you even before they disclosed what they said they found in the safe,that nothing was in there.That proves they must of planted whatever they say they got in the safe.I heard they brought a safe cracker to the residence when the search warrant was served,I don't know if that's normal procedure or not.But somehow they knew the safe was going to be an important part of the things they wanted to search.Almost like someone who the government has been talking to said,you will find what your looking for in the safe.I had also heard that the government didn't allow any of the trumps or people who worked there to be around when they were conducting the search.So how would eric know if they found anything or not in the safe?I'm sure the government filmed the search and filmed the moment they cracked and opened the safe,but eric probably doesn't realize that.I'm probably wrong,and it's probably just cause I've been drinking and celebrating this historical couple days for this country,but it just struck me as strange the way he casually made sure to say that nothing was in the safe.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
The law prohibits DOJ from discussing a search warrant that is under seal. Secrecy rules are designed to protect the person under investigation. You know who could discuss it? Donald Trump, who would have received a copy of the inventory of items seized. Does anyone think that if Trump believed presenting the warrant would help him, legitimately or otherwise, he wouldn't? He would be blasting the details all over. And he is not. Just give that a little thought...
I find it strange that I haven't heard Ivanka or Jared say anything yet.Dumb and Dumber(eric and junior)have said something about it,but i haven't heard anything from the kushner's yet.
What kind of strikes me is the way eric said "You know they broke into a safe.He didn't even have anything in the safe".I would bet they did find something in the safe,but eric's gonna try and get ahead of that story by saying nothing was in there.Then when they do disclose that they found whatever in the safe.He can say i told you even before they disclosed what they said they found in the safe,that nothing was in there.That proves they must of planted whatever they say they got in the safe.I heard they brought a safe cracker to the residence when the search warrant was served,I don't know if that's normal procedure or not.But somehow they knew the safe was going to be an important part of the things they wanted to search.Almost like someone who the government has been talking to said,you will find what your looking for in the safe.I had also heard that the government didn't allow any of the trumps or people who worked there to be around when they were conducting the search.So how would eric know if they found anything or not in the safe?I'm sure the government filmed the search and filmed the moment they cracked and opened the safe,but eric probably doesn't realize that.I'm probably wrong,and it's probably just cause I've been drinking and celebrating this historical couple days for this country,but it just struck me as strange the way he casually made sure to say that nothing was in the safe.
Could be for the Jan 6 investigation, although the easier explanation is that it¡¯s for the illegal transport and storage of classified records by the Former Guy. I wouldn¡¯t be surprised if it was for the Jan 6 DOJ investigation, as Congressman Perry¡¯s cell phone was seized via a warrant today. He complained that the DOJ didn¡¯t call his lawyer first to notify him about the warrant for his phone LOL. Man, if he really is dumb enough to think that a good prosecutor will notify a suspect in advance about seizure of evidence via warrant, he has no understanding of how laws work and is clearly incompetent. Guy clearly has no business being in any position of power
1
@MrWhatsItToYa
Could be for the Jan 6 investigation, although the easier explanation is that it¡¯s for the illegal transport and storage of classified records by the Former Guy. I wouldn¡¯t be surprised if it was for the Jan 6 DOJ investigation, as Congressman Perry¡¯s cell phone was seized via a warrant today. He complained that the DOJ didn¡¯t call his lawyer first to notify him about the warrant for his phone LOL. Man, if he really is dumb enough to think that a good prosecutor will notify a suspect in advance about seizure of evidence via warrant, he has no understanding of how laws work and is clearly incompetent. Guy clearly has no business being in any position of power
Went sailing for a couple of days and missed all this. Wow!! "Grifters always working a grift." Anything with the seal on it was going to e-bay to max his profit from the con he pulled off dismantling democracy as he never ever rolled that way his whole life. This stuff should keep everybody busy with their views.
2
Went sailing for a couple of days and missed all this. Wow!! "Grifters always working a grift." Anything with the seal on it was going to e-bay to max his profit from the con he pulled off dismantling democracy as he never ever rolled that way his whole life. This stuff should keep everybody busy with their views.
Went sailing for a couple of days and missed all this. Wow!! "Grifters always working a grift." Anything with the seal on it was going to e-bay to max his profit from the con he pulled off dismantling democracy as he never ever rolled that way his whole life. This stuff should keep everybody busy with their views.
Who enabled that guy?
1
Quote Originally Posted by JOHNNY_ODAE:
Went sailing for a couple of days and missed all this. Wow!! "Grifters always working a grift." Anything with the seal on it was going to e-bay to max his profit from the con he pulled off dismantling democracy as he never ever rolled that way his whole life. This stuff should keep everybody busy with their views.
Trump supporters are hysterical, accusing Biden administration of weaponizing justice department for political gain. They aren't arguing Trump is innocent. Instead they are arguing that it doesn't matter if he is guilty. They condemn FBI for doing its job properly. Besides, this search isn't run by democrats because FBI director is a Trump appointee.
2
Trump supporters are hysterical, accusing Biden administration of weaponizing justice department for political gain. They aren't arguing Trump is innocent. Instead they are arguing that it doesn't matter if he is guilty. They condemn FBI for doing its job properly. Besides, this search isn't run by democrats because FBI director is a Trump appointee.
I actually know this from my own criminal past.But if you are complaining about how you were arrested,instead of why you were arrested.You committed the crimes you were arrested for.
1
@thirdperson
I actually know this from my own criminal past.But if you are complaining about how you were arrested,instead of why you were arrested.You committed the crimes you were arrested for.
If they don't find anything real and substantial this will definitely hurt him and the party, imo.
Probably a little.Just like I can't see to many devoted trump people saying they won't vote for him,no matter what they find from this.People who can't stand the traitor,aren't really going to say they will vote for him just cause this amounted to nothing.
2
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
If they don't find anything real and substantial this will definitely hurt him and the party, imo.
Probably a little.Just like I can't see to many devoted trump people saying they won't vote for him,no matter what they find from this.People who can't stand the traitor,aren't really going to say they will vote for him just cause this amounted to nothing.
What's funny is you got all these republicans screaming about what happened,"We want answers,and we want then right now.We wanna know why this was done".(trump could tell them cause he has the warrant,but of course he won't)
Jan 6th happened almost 2 years ago,and you still can't get most republicans to go under oath to tell their side of the story,almost 2 years of dicking around with these people.But now after not even 2 days,their screaming they want answers,and they want them now.
4
What's funny is you got all these republicans screaming about what happened,"We want answers,and we want then right now.We wanna know why this was done".(trump could tell them cause he has the warrant,but of course he won't)
Jan 6th happened almost 2 years ago,and you still can't get most republicans to go under oath to tell their side of the story,almost 2 years of dicking around with these people.But now after not even 2 days,their screaming they want answers,and they want them now.
What's funny is you got all these republicans screaming about what happened,"We want answers,and we want then right now.We wanna know why this was done".(trump could tell them cause he has the warrant,but of course he won't) Jan 6th happened almost 2 years ago,and you still can't get most republicans to go under oath to tell their side of the story,almost 2 years of dicking around with these people.But now after not even 2 days,their screaming they want answers,and they want them now.
You make excellent points!
2
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
What's funny is you got all these republicans screaming about what happened,"We want answers,and we want then right now.We wanna know why this was done".(trump could tell them cause he has the warrant,but of course he won't) Jan 6th happened almost 2 years ago,and you still can't get most republicans to go under oath to tell their side of the story,almost 2 years of dicking around with these people.But now after not even 2 days,their screaming they want answers,and they want them now.
Will former NYC Police commissioner Bernard Kerik be correct? If the raid on President Trump by joe biden's FBI does not stop him from running for President in 2024. Assassination will be their next move!
lets all hope so
3
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Will former NYC Police commissioner Bernard Kerik be correct? If the raid on President Trump by joe biden's FBI does not stop him from running for President in 2024. Assassination will be their next move!
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: Will former NYC Police commissioner Bernard Kerik be correct? If the raid on President Trump by joe biden's FBI does not stop him from running for President in 2024. Assassination will be their next move! lets all hope so
Maybe he could go on a vacation one of those gala quail shoots in west Texas with Dick Cheney ....
1
Quote Originally Posted by fullblown:
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: Will former NYC Police commissioner Bernard Kerik be correct? If the raid on President Trump by joe biden's FBI does not stop him from running for President in 2024. Assassination will be their next move! lets all hope so
Maybe he could go on a vacation one of those gala quail shoots in west Texas with Dick Cheney ....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.