We should be more inclined to believe the evidence, which can lead to conviction or innocence based on legal arguments, common sense, and basic human gut intuition.
Believing "victims" blindly has led society down the wrong path, with the #metoo social justice movement being proof how wrong and misguided it is,,,truly innocent people being #cancelled without cause or justification cannot have their lives reversed to normalcy when they are found to be cleared of any wrongful allegations because the damage to their lives had already been made and is usually irreversible.
Facts and opinions are very different animals.
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
1
We should be more inclined to believe the evidence, which can lead to conviction or innocence based on legal arguments, common sense, and basic human gut intuition.
Believing "victims" blindly has led society down the wrong path, with the #metoo social justice movement being proof how wrong and misguided it is,,,truly innocent people being #cancelled without cause or justification cannot have their lives reversed to normalcy when they are found to be cleared of any wrongful allegations because the damage to their lives had already been made and is usually irreversible.
For years, during Covid, I always thought you were a BOT with a goal of spreading the most ridiculous misinformation to this site. I thought to myself clearly no human being is this stupid and completely gobbles up every lie they tell him. Now, with the E Jean Carroll stuff and saying OJ is innocent im convinced.
You've been fairly quiet for a while but it is an election year, so im to assume youll be here daily posting the most ridiculous shit?
Came out to watch you play, why are you running away?
0
@DeezyAZ81
For years, during Covid, I always thought you were a BOT with a goal of spreading the most ridiculous misinformation to this site. I thought to myself clearly no human being is this stupid and completely gobbles up every lie they tell him. Now, with the E Jean Carroll stuff and saying OJ is innocent im convinced.
You've been fairly quiet for a while but it is an election year, so im to assume youll be here daily posting the most ridiculous shit?
@DeezyAZ81 For years, during Covid, I always thought you were a BOT with a goal of spreading the most ridiculous misinformation to this site. I thought to myself clearly no human being is this stupid and completely gobbles up every lie they tell him. Now, with the E Jean Carroll stuff and saying OJ is innocent im convinced. You've been fairly quiet for a while but it is an election year, so im to assume youll be here daily posting the most ridiculous shit?
Coming from you this is rich. You are widely known as the premiere moron on the site from pretty much everyone here and only been around what 4 months?
What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact.
Interesting that you claim you have been following me around for years. How is that possible since your username has only been in existence for 4 months?
Way to expose yourself. Is that you Detox? Gambleholic? Circusclown? What handle were your running around here with before? Could not stay away could you??
Psychos like yourself can never stay away. GFY fraud.
2
Quote Originally Posted by XXMyThirdEyeXX:
@DeezyAZ81 For years, during Covid, I always thought you were a BOT with a goal of spreading the most ridiculous misinformation to this site. I thought to myself clearly no human being is this stupid and completely gobbles up every lie they tell him. Now, with the E Jean Carroll stuff and saying OJ is innocent im convinced. You've been fairly quiet for a while but it is an election year, so im to assume youll be here daily posting the most ridiculous shit?
Coming from you this is rich. You are widely known as the premiere moron on the site from pretty much everyone here and only been around what 4 months?
What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact.
Interesting that you claim you have been following me around for years. How is that possible since your username has only been in existence for 4 months?
Way to expose yourself. Is that you Detox? Gambleholic? Circusclown? What handle were your running around here with before? Could not stay away could you??
Psychos like yourself can never stay away. GFY fraud.
What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact.
Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
America First
0
@DeezyAZ81
What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact.
Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
@DeezyAZ81 What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact. Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
Im very aware of what happened in Civil Court against OJ and no it is not similar at all. Good effort though. Damages is not the same as "murder". There was no word or write-up from the judge in OJ's civil trial that he was guilty of murder. However, the judge in Trumps civil trial did say the evidence supports that Trump raped Carroll. Secondly, there was no criminal trial in Trump's case because of statute of limitations, so he was never found innocent in a criminal trial. Situations are not even remotely similar. OJ was criminally charged and exonerated for his accused crime, Trump was not.
Good try though. I expected some Republican to come with this lame a$$ argument and analogy and of course here it was.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@DeezyAZ81 What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact. Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
Im very aware of what happened in Civil Court against OJ and no it is not similar at all. Good effort though. Damages is not the same as "murder". There was no word or write-up from the judge in OJ's civil trial that he was guilty of murder. However, the judge in Trumps civil trial did say the evidence supports that Trump raped Carroll. Secondly, there was no criminal trial in Trump's case because of statute of limitations, so he was never found innocent in a criminal trial. Situations are not even remotely similar. OJ was criminally charged and exonerated for his accused crime, Trump was not.
Good try though. I expected some Republican to come with this lame a$$ argument and analogy and of course here it was.
@DeezyAZ81 What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact. Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
Also as someone kindly pointed out your are not convicted in civil court, simply held liable. There was no conviction of murder for OJ in criminal or civil court.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@DeezyAZ81 What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact. Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
Also as someone kindly pointed out your are not convicted in civil court, simply held liable. There was no conviction of murder for OJ in criminal or civil court.
@DeezyAZ81 What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact. Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
You did not prove anything I said incorrect. OJ was proven innocent in his criminal trial. 100% factual and correct. The civil case was not a murder trial.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@DeezyAZ81 What is wrong with saying OJ is innocent in the court of law? Was he convicted of murder in court or no? I know this angers you but he was innocent in his murder trial. 100% fact. Orenthal was convicted in Civil court of the two deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages..... kinda like Trump was found innocent of rape but guilty in the civil trial.... I know some of you guys will love this analogy
You did not prove anything I said incorrect. OJ was proven innocent in his criminal trial. 100% factual and correct. The civil case was not a murder trial.
@DeezyAZ81 For years, during Covid, I always thought you were a BOT with a goal of spreading the most ridiculous misinformation to this site. I thought to myself clearly no human being is this stupid and completely gobbles up every lie they tell him. Now, with the E Jean Carroll stuff and saying OJ is innocent im convinced. You've been fairly quiet for a while but it is an election year, so im to assume youll be here daily posting the most ridiculous shit?
Still waiting to hear back?? Who are you? What was your other username before this ghost account? You sure got quiet quick.
It has to be Detox or Gambleholic guaranteed.
1
Quote Originally Posted by XXMyThirdEyeXX:
@DeezyAZ81 For years, during Covid, I always thought you were a BOT with a goal of spreading the most ridiculous misinformation to this site. I thought to myself clearly no human being is this stupid and completely gobbles up every lie they tell him. Now, with the E Jean Carroll stuff and saying OJ is innocent im convinced. You've been fairly quiet for a while but it is an election year, so im to assume youll be here daily posting the most ridiculous shit?
Still waiting to hear back?? Who are you? What was your other username before this ghost account? You sure got quiet quick.
The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers!
0
The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers!
Im very aware of what happened in Civil Court against OJ and no it is not similar at all. Good effort though. Damages is not the same as "murder". There was no word or write-up from the judge in OJ's civil trial that he was guilty of murder. However, the judge in Trumps civil trial did say the evidence supports that Trump raped Carroll. Secondly, there was no criminal trial in Trump's case because of statute of limitations, so he was never found innocent in a criminal trial. Situations are not even remotely similar. OJ was criminally charged and exonerated for his accused crime, Trump was not.
Deezy my neezy, come on now man I thought you were better than this..... Honestly thought you were poking the bear and going down that road with the "OJ was innocent of murder"....as in, you KNOW he was the one who turned Nicole and Ron into human PEZ dispensers but were just calling him "innocent" since he was not found "guilty of murder by a jury of his peers". Kinda like how all the TDS regards around here call Trump a "convicted rapist" even though that is false, ya know like "OJ is innocent".
I guess I overestimated you..... my bad, my apologies. Carry on and nevermind....
America First
0
@DeezyAZ81
Im very aware of what happened in Civil Court against OJ and no it is not similar at all. Good effort though. Damages is not the same as "murder". There was no word or write-up from the judge in OJ's civil trial that he was guilty of murder. However, the judge in Trumps civil trial did say the evidence supports that Trump raped Carroll. Secondly, there was no criminal trial in Trump's case because of statute of limitations, so he was never found innocent in a criminal trial. Situations are not even remotely similar. OJ was criminally charged and exonerated for his accused crime, Trump was not.
Deezy my neezy, come on now man I thought you were better than this..... Honestly thought you were poking the bear and going down that road with the "OJ was innocent of murder"....as in, you KNOW he was the one who turned Nicole and Ron into human PEZ dispensers but were just calling him "innocent" since he was not found "guilty of murder by a jury of his peers". Kinda like how all the TDS regards around here call Trump a "convicted rapist" even though that is false, ya know like "OJ is innocent".
I guess I overestimated you..... my bad, my apologies. Carry on and nevermind....
P.S. please don't call me a republican. It is antagonistic name calling to me under the Covers rules and guidelines as outlined by our esteemed moderator.
Thanks
America First
1
@DeezyAZ81
P.S. please don't call me a republican. It is antagonistic name calling to me under the Covers rules and guidelines as outlined by our esteemed moderator.
@DeezyAZ81 P.S. please don't call me a republican. It is antagonistic name calling to me under the Covers rules and guidelines as outlined by our esteemed moderator. Thanks
haha. Touche.
1
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@DeezyAZ81 P.S. please don't call me a republican. It is antagonistic name calling to me under the Covers rules and guidelines as outlined by our esteemed moderator. Thanks
The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers!
really its just 2 people. they are very "special"
Came out to watch you play, why are you running away?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers!
what the hell covers, posts are not going through way too often these days....you spend all those precious seconds typing fire stuff and then it just disappears.... second time around is never as good as the original...
@DeezyAZ81
Deezy my neezy, come on now man I thought you were better than this..... Honestly thought you were poking the bear and going down that road with the "OJ was innocent of murder"....as in, you KNOW he was the one who turned Nicole and Ron into human PEZ dispensers but were just calling him "innocent" since he was not found "guilty of murder by a jury of his peers". Kinda like how all the TDS regards around here call Trump a "convicted rapist" even though that is false, ya know like "OJ is innocent".
I guess I overestimated you..... my bad, my apologies. Carry on and nevermind....
America First
0
what the hell covers, posts are not going through way too often these days....you spend all those precious seconds typing fire stuff and then it just disappears.... second time around is never as good as the original...
@DeezyAZ81
Deezy my neezy, come on now man I thought you were better than this..... Honestly thought you were poking the bear and going down that road with the "OJ was innocent of murder"....as in, you KNOW he was the one who turned Nicole and Ron into human PEZ dispensers but were just calling him "innocent" since he was not found "guilty of murder by a jury of his peers". Kinda like how all the TDS regards around here call Trump a "convicted rapist" even though that is false, ya know like "OJ is innocent".
I guess I overestimated you..... my bad, my apologies. Carry on and nevermind....
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers! really its just 2 people. they are very "special"
Rich coming from a proven ghost account. What up tox? Just could not stay away huh?
0
Quote Originally Posted by XXMyThirdEyeXX:
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers! really its just 2 people. they are very "special"
Rich coming from a proven ghost account. What up tox? Just could not stay away huh?
@sundance arguing with a leftist is like playing chess with a pigeon. it knocks over a few pieces , shits on the board , and then struts around like it won.
So true!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:
@sundance arguing with a leftist is like playing chess with a pigeon. it knocks over a few pieces , shits on the board , and then struts around like it won.
what the hell covers, posts are not going through way too often these days....you spend all those precious seconds typing fire stuff and then it just disappears.... second time around is never as good as the original... @DeezyAZ81 Deezy my neezy, come on now man I thought you were better than this..... Honestly thought you were poking the bear and going down that road with the "OJ was innocent of murder"....as in, you KNOW he was the one who turned Nicole and Ron into human PEZ dispensers but were just calling him "innocent" since he was not found "guilty of murder by a jury of his peers". Kinda like how all the TDS regards around here call Trump a "convicted rapist" even though that is false, ya know like "OJ is innocent". I guess I overestimated you..... my bad, my apologies. Carry on and nevermind....
No fan of OJ really. Just making a point. If he is a murderer (when exonerated in criminal court), Trump is a rapist. Same guys running around here screaming Trump did nothing to Carroll when she is 2-0 against him in civil court (Sexual abuse/assault and defamation) and OJ is a murder (when he is 1-0 in criminal court on murder charges) is hypocritical. Different standards because they worship and vote for the orange guy. At least be consistent. If Trump is innocent, so is OJ by their biased legal standards.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
what the hell covers, posts are not going through way too often these days....you spend all those precious seconds typing fire stuff and then it just disappears.... second time around is never as good as the original... @DeezyAZ81 Deezy my neezy, come on now man I thought you were better than this..... Honestly thought you were poking the bear and going down that road with the "OJ was innocent of murder"....as in, you KNOW he was the one who turned Nicole and Ron into human PEZ dispensers but were just calling him "innocent" since he was not found "guilty of murder by a jury of his peers". Kinda like how all the TDS regards around here call Trump a "convicted rapist" even though that is false, ya know like "OJ is innocent". I guess I overestimated you..... my bad, my apologies. Carry on and nevermind....
No fan of OJ really. Just making a point. If he is a murderer (when exonerated in criminal court), Trump is a rapist. Same guys running around here screaming Trump did nothing to Carroll when she is 2-0 against him in civil court (Sexual abuse/assault and defamation) and OJ is a murder (when he is 1-0 in criminal court on murder charges) is hypocritical. Different standards because they worship and vote for the orange guy. At least be consistent. If Trump is innocent, so is OJ by their biased legal standards.
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers! really its just 2 people. they are very "special"
True! It is difficult to keep up with these characters!
0
Quote Originally Posted by XXMyThirdEyeXX:
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: The Lefties inside this thread continue to illustrate the definition of liberalism. Truly a very sad state of affairs inside the once very hallowed pages of Covers! really its just 2 people. they are very "special"
True! It is difficult to keep up with these characters!
Funny how former stormy attorney admitting that she lied about everything. Carroll best friend was not allowed to testify because she would prove it was all a lie. All these cases are politically motivated. A complete embarrassment for our country. Guess they figured that they can't steal another election so let's try to embarrass,, harass and try to put him in jail.
0
Funny how former stormy attorney admitting that she lied about everything. Carroll best friend was not allowed to testify because she would prove it was all a lie. All these cases are politically motivated. A complete embarrassment for our country. Guess they figured that they can't steal another election so let's try to embarrass,, harass and try to put him in jail.
@XXMyThirdEyeXX I guess you took a break from trolling here to troll my thread. Amazing a man with a wife and kids with a job in the prime of his life has all this team to be posting here and trolling people. Unless it's all made up you
almost as amazing as someone like yourself who loses more in a year than I make ( awesome claim BTW ) is able to nap all day and then troll guys like Flutie and VMF on the regular.
pot meet kettle
Came out to watch you play, why are you running away?
1
Quote Originally Posted by Brooklyncapper:
@XXMyThirdEyeXX I guess you took a break from trolling here to troll my thread. Amazing a man with a wife and kids with a job in the prime of his life has all this team to be posting here and trolling people. Unless it's all made up you
almost as amazing as someone like yourself who loses more in a year than I make ( awesome claim BTW ) is able to nap all day and then troll guys like Flutie and VMF on the regular.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.