@iConsciousness Fair enough, Herbert is very good. The point I was trying to make is that qb's coming out of the pac12 have historically not succeeded in the nfl. For every Justin Herbert there are 12 other busts from that conference. I'll take a gander at the list later when I'm not driving. Anyways, this will be a thing of the past as 3/4's of the pac12 teams have bailed on that conference.
Touche'. Marcus Mariota, Joey Harrington, and Mark Sanchez never translated well into the NFL. I don't even remember which Huskies have ever made an impact at QB. The last great one was Warren Moon, and Brunell was fair-to-middling. Penix is TBD, but he comes with an injury history.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
@iConsciousness Fair enough, Herbert is very good. The point I was trying to make is that qb's coming out of the pac12 have historically not succeeded in the nfl. For every Justin Herbert there are 12 other busts from that conference. I'll take a gander at the list later when I'm not driving. Anyways, this will be a thing of the past as 3/4's of the pac12 teams have bailed on that conference.
Touche'. Marcus Mariota, Joey Harrington, and Mark Sanchez never translated well into the NFL. I don't even remember which Huskies have ever made an impact at QB. The last great one was Warren Moon, and Brunell was fair-to-middling. Penix is TBD, but he comes with an injury history.
Congrats to you fuckers that took the Boys...that was a solid ass kicking they gave the brownies...I had it pegged wrong a couple weeks ago in my post here but I can admit it and give credit when it's due..
Good job
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Congrats to you fuckers that took the Boys...that was a solid ass kicking they gave the brownies...I had it pegged wrong a couple weeks ago in my post here but I can admit it and give credit when it's due..
Watsons advanced metrics in the games he has played for Clev are pathetic, and there's not much positive commentary coming from the Browns beat writers this preseason, as it relates the marauder of masseuses.
Bigred ... this is reporting.
Pay attention
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Watsons advanced metrics in the games he has played for Clev are pathetic, and there's not much positive commentary coming from the Browns beat writers this preseason, as it relates the marauder of masseuses.
Played a few early ones all 1 unit flat ...... Chiefs ML -130 Packers +3 -113 Packers ML +130 Cards +7 -114 Vikings ML -112 Steelers +3 -113 See what happens I guess
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by trainwreck66:
Played a few early ones all 1 unit flat ...... Chiefs ML -130 Packers +3 -113 Packers ML +130 Cards +7 -114 Vikings ML -112 Steelers +3 -113 See what happens I guess
If it's not too early to talk about week 2, first thing that pops is a really strong line for the PB's beloved Cowboys at home vs the Saints...
Impossible to quantify a blow out win against the Panthers as meaningful. The Brownies may be every bit as bad as they played today. I mean they're the Browns right? In reality both teams may be better defensively than on offense. An under the total play seems smart.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
If it's not too early to talk about week 2, first thing that pops is a really strong line for the PB's beloved Cowboys at home vs the Saints...
Impossible to quantify a blow out win against the Panthers as meaningful. The Brownies may be every bit as bad as they played today. I mean they're the Browns right? In reality both teams may be better defensively than on offense. An under the total play seems smart.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Watsons advanced metrics in the games he has played for Clev are pathetic, and there's not much positive commentary coming from the Browns beat writers this preseason, as it relates the marauder of masseuses. Bigred ... this is reporting. Pay attention
Hugh. I love you brother but don¡¯t drive Shrimp over the edge right away. We¡¯ve got a whole season to go.
Shrimp. I like you brother but Hugh rips on you because he knows how thin skinned you are. Thou protest too much. The personal attacks are the blood the sharks feed on. Just relax. None of us are experts or pillars of perfection.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Watsons advanced metrics in the games he has played for Clev are pathetic, and there's not much positive commentary coming from the Browns beat writers this preseason, as it relates the marauder of masseuses. Bigred ... this is reporting. Pay attention
Hugh. I love you brother but don¡¯t drive Shrimp over the edge right away. We¡¯ve got a whole season to go.
Shrimp. I like you brother but Hugh rips on you because he knows how thin skinned you are. Thou protest too much. The personal attacks are the blood the sharks feed on. Just relax. None of us are experts or pillars of perfection.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Watsons advanced metrics in the games he has played for Clev are pathetic, and there's not much positive commentary coming from the Browns beat writers this preseason, as it relates the marauder of masseuses. Bigred ... this is reporting. Pay attention Hugh. I love you brother but don¡¯t drive Shrimp over the edge right away. We¡¯ve got a whole season to go. Shrimp. I like you brother but Hugh rips on you because he knows how thin skinned you are. Thou protest too much. The personal attacks are the blood the sharks feed on. Just relax. None of us are experts or pillars of perfection.
Im good......Tigger thinks another SB is next........
27 years since the last one.....
The Steelers lead the AFC North....
In November they will be in last place....
Week 1 Tigger.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cranky_Hank:
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Watsons advanced metrics in the games he has played for Clev are pathetic, and there's not much positive commentary coming from the Browns beat writers this preseason, as it relates the marauder of masseuses. Bigred ... this is reporting. Pay attention Hugh. I love you brother but don¡¯t drive Shrimp over the edge right away. We¡¯ve got a whole season to go. Shrimp. I like you brother but Hugh rips on you because he knows how thin skinned you are. Thou protest too much. The personal attacks are the blood the sharks feed on. Just relax. None of us are experts or pillars of perfection.
Im good......Tigger thinks another SB is next........
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If it's not too early to talk about week 2, first thing that pops is a really strong line for the PB's beloved Cowboys at home vs the Saints... Impossible to quantify a blow out win against the Panthers as meaningful. The Brownies may be every bit as bad as they played today. I mean they're the Browns right? In reality both teams may be better defensively than on offense. An under the total play seems smart.
Both statements can be very true. I'm just wondering how the Boys went from +2.5 at home, to -7, at home. I don't care who they're playing, let me try to make sense of my thoughts.
The narrative all off season was how the Cowboys didn't make any moves, Jerry didn't do anything. The public wrote them off.
They spank the Browns. The tide shifts instantly on a Sunday afternoon.
I think that the books know the power of Dallas bettors when it comes to the betting market, alla New York Yankees and Dodgers.
I can't ignore the Saints thrashing of Carolina, even though it's Carolina, they are horrible.
I'm not saying this line should be Dallas -3, but 7?! Really? I was thinking Dallas -4 would look like a legitimate #.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: If it's not too early to talk about week 2, first thing that pops is a really strong line for the PB's beloved Cowboys at home vs the Saints... Impossible to quantify a blow out win against the Panthers as meaningful. The Brownies may be every bit as bad as they played today. I mean they're the Browns right? In reality both teams may be better defensively than on offense. An under the total play seems smart.
Both statements can be very true. I'm just wondering how the Boys went from +2.5 at home, to -7, at home. I don't care who they're playing, let me try to make sense of my thoughts.
The narrative all off season was how the Cowboys didn't make any moves, Jerry didn't do anything. The public wrote them off.
They spank the Browns. The tide shifts instantly on a Sunday afternoon.
I think that the books know the power of Dallas bettors when it comes to the betting market, alla New York Yankees and Dodgers.
I can't ignore the Saints thrashing of Carolina, even though it's Carolina, they are horrible.
I'm not saying this line should be Dallas -3, but 7?! Really? I was thinking Dallas -4 would look like a legitimate #.
That OT last night cost me the side bet. I¡¯m going with Over 43.5. for tonight¡¯s game. Hopefully Mr.Rodgers don¡¯t go down. I need him to throw some TD¡¯s
0
That OT last night cost me the side bet. I¡¯m going with Over 43.5. for tonight¡¯s game. Hopefully Mr.Rodgers don¡¯t go down. I need him to throw some TD¡¯s
I'm just wondering how the Boys went from +2.5 at home, to -7, at home. I don't care who they're playing, let me try to make sense of my thoughts. The narrative all off season was how the Cowboys didn't make any moves, Jerry didn't do anything. The public wrote them off. They spank the Browns. The tide shifts instantly on a Sunday afternoon. I think that the books know the power of Dallas bettors when it comes to the betting market, alla New York Yankees and Dodgers. I can't ignore the Saints thrashing of Carolina, even though it's Carolina, they are horrible. I'm not saying this line should be Dallas -3, but 7?! Really? I was thinking Dallas -4 would look like a legitimate #.
I was explain why the current line of 6.5 is spot on, and the reasons why in the next edition of the CD Newsletter
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
I'm just wondering how the Boys went from +2.5 at home, to -7, at home. I don't care who they're playing, let me try to make sense of my thoughts. The narrative all off season was how the Cowboys didn't make any moves, Jerry didn't do anything. The public wrote them off. They spank the Browns. The tide shifts instantly on a Sunday afternoon. I think that the books know the power of Dallas bettors when it comes to the betting market, alla New York Yankees and Dodgers. I can't ignore the Saints thrashing of Carolina, even though it's Carolina, they are horrible. I'm not saying this line should be Dallas -3, but 7?! Really? I was thinking Dallas -4 would look like a legitimate #.
I was explain why the current line of 6.5 is spot on, and the reasons why in the next edition of the CD Newsletter
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.