So it is rigged and it only states back to the fact one should seek to follow where the money lies and reveal the opposite side plain and simple. Easier said than done is understood but knock off the old school handicapping because most times it will be for naught and rendered useless in the end.
2
So it is rigged and it only states back to the fact one should seek to follow where the money lies and reveal the opposite side plain and simple. Easier said than done is understood but knock off the old school handicapping because most times it will be for naught and rendered useless in the end.
So you didn¡¯t realize it after the Falcons were snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock with an 8 point lead, less than 4 minutes left in the 4th AND in field goal range? Not to mention they were still throwing the football¡ with the ball at the Patriots 22 yard line.
That¡¯s a 39 yard field goal for all you math wizards.
0
So you didn¡¯t realize it after the Falcons were snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock with an 8 point lead, less than 4 minutes left in the 4th AND in field goal range? Not to mention they were still throwing the football¡ with the ball at the Patriots 22 yard line.
That¡¯s a 39 yard field goal for all you math wizards.
Ask and you shall receive. This is covers bro, no one gives a hoot about your loss or how much you think it's rigged. You need better discipline, it's not easy to win long term. I'd suggest you start watching nhl. Football has to any variables. 22 players on a field, all head hunting.
Good luck tomorrow!!
1
Ask and you shall receive. This is covers bro, no one gives a hoot about your loss or how much you think it's rigged. You need better discipline, it's not easy to win long term. I'd suggest you start watching nhl. Football has to any variables. 22 players on a field, all head hunting.
It¡¯s actually a useful conversation which gets ruined because people get lazy with their terminology. Rigged can mean different things to different people so the debate goes forever
I prefer the theory that NFL is sports entertainment. The refs are not generally bribed to overtly favour certain teams or outcomes but are encouraged to keep the game close and tense where possible
Add to that the subconscious human bias that tends to result in favourable calls for home teams or big players and that¡¯s pretty much where we are today
1
It¡¯s actually a useful conversation which gets ruined because people get lazy with their terminology. Rigged can mean different things to different people so the debate goes forever
I prefer the theory that NFL is sports entertainment. The refs are not generally bribed to overtly favour certain teams or outcomes but are encouraged to keep the game close and tense where possible
Add to that the subconscious human bias that tends to result in favourable calls for home teams or big players and that¡¯s pretty much where we are today
Putting aide the ¡°rigged¡± angle, I think you made 2 fundamental errors
1) you violated the ¡°don¡¯t take the worst of it¡± rule¡¡you could¡¯ve had Lions -2¡¯ before the game started, why would you then lay -13 to the packers in game? In Green Bay? Especially considering that they can rally and close the deficit, since they are like #6 in PPG. The only play worth consideration would¡¯ve been packers +13 in game¡..or pass on any in game action
2) this is not the NBA, where a team can be expected to score a certain number of points in a game. In football, if a team scores 20 points in the first half, that doesn¡¯t mean they are on track to score 40 in the full game. They might get shut out in the second half, or maybe only manage 3 more points, or whatever. As it is, they scored pretty close to the expected TT, just under, so it¡¯s not too surprising that the second half scoring didn¡¯t match what they did in the first half. I believe some call this ¡°regression to the mean¡±
GL with future plays
2
Putting aide the ¡°rigged¡± angle, I think you made 2 fundamental errors
1) you violated the ¡°don¡¯t take the worst of it¡± rule¡¡you could¡¯ve had Lions -2¡¯ before the game started, why would you then lay -13 to the packers in game? In Green Bay? Especially considering that they can rally and close the deficit, since they are like #6 in PPG. The only play worth consideration would¡¯ve been packers +13 in game¡..or pass on any in game action
2) this is not the NBA, where a team can be expected to score a certain number of points in a game. In football, if a team scores 20 points in the first half, that doesn¡¯t mean they are on track to score 40 in the full game. They might get shut out in the second half, or maybe only manage 3 more points, or whatever. As it is, they scored pretty close to the expected TT, just under, so it¡¯s not too surprising that the second half scoring didn¡¯t match what they did in the first half. I believe some call this ¡°regression to the mean¡±
Well better stop betting now¡lol..you probably like 99.9 percent of bettors especially after 30 years of betting have lost a lot money so why do you care now after fucking 30 years of a degenerate habit
0
Well better stop betting now¡lol..you probably like 99.9 percent of bettors especially after 30 years of betting have lost a lot money so why do you care now after fucking 30 years of a degenerate habit
Putting aide the ¡°rigged¡± angle, I think you made 2 fundamental errors 1) you violated the ¡°don¡¯t take the worst of it¡± rule¡¡you could¡¯ve had Lions -2¡¯ before the game started, why would you then lay -13 to the packers in game? In Green Bay? Especially considering that they can rally and close the deficit, since they are like #6 in PPG. The only play worth consideration would¡¯ve been packers +13 in game¡..or pass on any in game action 2) this is not the NBA, where a team can be expected to score a certain number of points in a game. In football, if a team scores 20 points in the first half, that doesn¡¯t mean they are on track to score 40 in the full game. They might get shut out in the second half, or maybe only manage 3 more points, or whatever. As it is, they scored pretty close to the expected TT, just under, so it¡¯s not too surprising that the second half scoring didn¡¯t match what they did in the first half. I believe some call this ¡°regression to the mean¡± GL with future plays
Great post
1
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit:
Putting aide the ¡°rigged¡± angle, I think you made 2 fundamental errors 1) you violated the ¡°don¡¯t take the worst of it¡± rule¡¡you could¡¯ve had Lions -2¡¯ before the game started, why would you then lay -13 to the packers in game? In Green Bay? Especially considering that they can rally and close the deficit, since they are like #6 in PPG. The only play worth consideration would¡¯ve been packers +13 in game¡..or pass on any in game action 2) this is not the NBA, where a team can be expected to score a certain number of points in a game. In football, if a team scores 20 points in the first half, that doesn¡¯t mean they are on track to score 40 in the full game. They might get shut out in the second half, or maybe only manage 3 more points, or whatever. As it is, they scored pretty close to the expected TT, just under, so it¡¯s not too surprising that the second half scoring didn¡¯t match what they did in the first half. I believe some call this ¡°regression to the mean¡± GL with future plays
ANYTHING u can bet on. Can and will have corruption. It's that simple. Can't believe it took u 30 years to realized it honestly. Now with it being legalized it's even worse. Remember, the NFL is a business. It doesn't take a lot to rigg alter a game. Most people believe the whole team gotta be in on it. Ref alone can rig an outcome of a game how they want it. Tim donaughty anyone?
1
ANYTHING u can bet on. Can and will have corruption. It's that simple. Can't believe it took u 30 years to realized it honestly. Now with it being legalized it's even worse. Remember, the NFL is a business. It doesn't take a lot to rigg alter a game. Most people believe the whole team gotta be in on it. Ref alone can rig an outcome of a game how they want it. Tim donaughty anyone?
Please do a Youtube search: "Former NFL Player Dwight Smith EXPOSES NFL For RIGGING Games", then come back and tell your thoughts.
I learned this today, so I've been losing money blindly for the past 30 years. Please save the smart comments, I was just thinking I had "bad" seasons, since not all of them were negative; Actually, in the last 30+ years I've never had a negative season in the MLB or NCAA, but always negative for any other league, specially the NBA, I never had a positive one, so I decided not to even try again, and that was about 20 years ago, so I guess I was just either lucky or hitting the right ones without knowing it, just thinking my calculations were right. Wow. I guess I'll take another shot this year just looking from a different angle, the "WWE" angle. Otherwise, I'll stick only to what I've been profitable and master that.
1
Please do a Youtube search: "Former NFL Player Dwight Smith EXPOSES NFL For RIGGING Games", then come back and tell your thoughts.
I learned this today, so I've been losing money blindly for the past 30 years. Please save the smart comments, I was just thinking I had "bad" seasons, since not all of them were negative; Actually, in the last 30+ years I've never had a negative season in the MLB or NCAA, but always negative for any other league, specially the NBA, I never had a positive one, so I decided not to even try again, and that was about 20 years ago, so I guess I was just either lucky or hitting the right ones without knowing it, just thinking my calculations were right. Wow. I guess I'll take another shot this year just looking from a different angle, the "WWE" angle. Otherwise, I'll stick only to what I've been profitable and master that.
So you didn¡¯t realize it after the Falcons were snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock with an 8 point lead, less than 4 minutes left in the 4th AND in field goal range? Not to mention they were still throwing the football¡ with the ball at the Patriots 22 yard line. That¡¯s a 39 yard field goal for all you math wizards.
Incomprehensible
0
Quote Originally Posted by P33PGame:
So you didn¡¯t realize it after the Falcons were snapping the ball with 15-20 seconds left on the clock with an 8 point lead, less than 4 minutes left in the 4th AND in field goal range? Not to mention they were still throwing the football¡ with the ball at the Patriots 22 yard line. That¡¯s a 39 yard field goal for all you math wizards.
2 more examples today alone ... falcons team total 27.5 and they went for 2 in 4th q w no reason and giants did same dumb thing and lost by 5 and line was 4 ... games have always been fixed ,not all but when you think how in the hell did that happen ,now you know ... any chance you saw Tim Donaghy documentary ? Nba ref from early 2000s and he was fall guy for rigging games and watch to see more about nba refs Still reffing nba games that were in close contact with Tim Donaghy back then ...
1
2 more examples today alone ... falcons team total 27.5 and they went for 2 in 4th q w no reason and giants did same dumb thing and lost by 5 and line was 4 ... games have always been fixed ,not all but when you think how in the hell did that happen ,now you know ... any chance you saw Tim Donaghy documentary ? Nba ref from early 2000s and he was fall guy for rigging games and watch to see more about nba refs Still reffing nba games that were in close contact with Tim Donaghy back then ...
So you made an exotic live bet that needed two elements to cash, neither of which are remotely close to the original spread or total which most bettors would have their action on, yet it was all rigged specifically to burn this one live bet?
Seriously find a new hobby because you are a special kind of stupid.
Live betting is a great way to lose money, even for experienced bettors it's very difficult. You always get the worst of the number and are just reacting to the last play, and the bookies are seeing 30 seconds ahead of you.
I wish a was a bookie since betting became legal because this new breed of bettors are absolutely retarded, and there's something bred into Americans (i grew up there so i know) where they can't accept not winning. If they don't win, it has to be fixed! (Remind you of anyone?)
0
So you made an exotic live bet that needed two elements to cash, neither of which are remotely close to the original spread or total which most bettors would have their action on, yet it was all rigged specifically to burn this one live bet?
Seriously find a new hobby because you are a special kind of stupid.
Live betting is a great way to lose money, even for experienced bettors it's very difficult. You always get the worst of the number and are just reacting to the last play, and the bookies are seeing 30 seconds ahead of you.
I wish a was a bookie since betting became legal because this new breed of bettors are absolutely retarded, and there's something bred into Americans (i grew up there so i know) where they can't accept not winning. If they don't win, it has to be fixed! (Remind you of anyone?)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.