NFL Season Record: -4.5 units
Giants +3.25 (3 units)
Jets -1.5 (3 units)
Vikings -1.5 (2 units)
Chiefs +2 (2 units)
Packers -2.75 (2 units)
Colts -3 (2 units)
GL all
NFL Season Record: -4.5 units
Giants +3.25 (3 units)
Jets -1.5 (3 units)
Vikings -1.5 (2 units)
Chiefs +2 (2 units)
Packers -2.75 (2 units)
Colts -3 (2 units)
GL all
NFL Season Record: -4.5 units
Giants +3.25 (3 units)
Jets -1.5 (3 units)
Vikings -1.5 (2 units)
Chiefs +2 (2 units)
Packers -2.75 (2 units)
Colts -3 (2 units)
GL all
It was a joke.
In order to be successful in NFL - it is required to bet on bad teams.
It was a joke.
In order to be successful in NFL - it is required to bet on bad teams.
Philly is healthy now and has far more talent than the Giants who are missing key defensive players on the line. Also Barkley revenge game
are you just going contrarian here?
Philly is healthy now and has far more talent than the Giants who are missing key defensive players on the line. Also Barkley revenge game
are you just going contrarian here?
Public all over Lions? No 1 has access to any bets besides the books
How do you know public is ALLLL over Lions??
If you believe the % they release might as well just bet what the "experts" on espn pick every week
Imagine believing books would actually tell u the handle
Public all over Lions? No 1 has access to any bets besides the books
How do you know public is ALLLL over Lions??
If you believe the % they release might as well just bet what the "experts" on espn pick every week
Imagine believing books would actually tell u the handle
There are two different things about it Percentage of bets and percentage of money It really does not matter The game is played on the field not at the window You think that book fear people knowing this information and everyone will run and "bet against the public" or "ride with the books?"
Greed, emotions, chasing and playing too many games keep the books in business
There are two different things about it Percentage of bets and percentage of money It really does not matter The game is played on the field not at the window You think that book fear people knowing this information and everyone will run and "bet against the public" or "ride with the books?"
Greed, emotions, chasing and playing too many games keep the books in business
@vanzack
Van, talk me out of the Browns +5' over the Bengals......please.
Burrows has never won in Cleveland, Bengals on their second straight road trip, Browns get Nick Chubb back....thoughts?
@vanzack
Van, talk me out of the Browns +5' over the Bengals......please.
Burrows has never won in Cleveland, Bengals on their second straight road trip, Browns get Nick Chubb back....thoughts?
I liked the Jets as well. What makes me hesitant is Jets typically do very poorly the next game after playing the Bills. You can go back several seasons and check.
Similar to a trend awhile back when teams would do poorly after playing the Niners.
I liked the Jets as well. What makes me hesitant is Jets typically do very poorly the next game after playing the Bills. You can go back several seasons and check.
Similar to a trend awhile back when teams would do poorly after playing the Niners.
@vanzack
How do Davante Adams and Russell Wilson factor into your play on the Jets?
For me, Pit was a 3u (max) with Fields at qb and no Adams. Now with Wilson at qb I lean Jets but won¡¯t play the game. Simply no way to accurately project the outcome with Wilson playing. IMO it will be awful. 50/50 chance he¡¯s better than Fields and very slim chance that he plays a great game. Most likely a sloppy game offensively with guys not on the same page.
Here¡¯s the thing about D. Adams-
we¡¯ll put aside the fact that he hasn¡¯t played with Rodgers in years. But let¡¯s acknowledge the fact that the WRs are not the problem in NY. The problems are 1. Offensive Line 2. Poorly coached/ coordinated team 3. Defense can¡¯t stop the run. Davante can¡¯t help with any of that.
I¡¯m actually really pissed that Wilson is playing because I would have hammered Pitt otherwise. Anyway, there¡¯s some facts and as usual a lot of my opinion. What¡¯s your take?
@vanzack
How do Davante Adams and Russell Wilson factor into your play on the Jets?
For me, Pit was a 3u (max) with Fields at qb and no Adams. Now with Wilson at qb I lean Jets but won¡¯t play the game. Simply no way to accurately project the outcome with Wilson playing. IMO it will be awful. 50/50 chance he¡¯s better than Fields and very slim chance that he plays a great game. Most likely a sloppy game offensively with guys not on the same page.
Here¡¯s the thing about D. Adams-
we¡¯ll put aside the fact that he hasn¡¯t played with Rodgers in years. But let¡¯s acknowledge the fact that the WRs are not the problem in NY. The problems are 1. Offensive Line 2. Poorly coached/ coordinated team 3. Defense can¡¯t stop the run. Davante can¡¯t help with any of that.
I¡¯m actually really pissed that Wilson is playing because I would have hammered Pitt otherwise. Anyway, there¡¯s some facts and as usual a lot of my opinion. What¡¯s your take?
You are wrong. Based on those lines-
Giants -107/108
Chiefs-110
Vikings -110
Colts -105
Pack -110
And that’s not using any exchange/low vig/offshore markets and wherever else VZ places bets
You are wrong. Based on those lines-
Giants -107/108
Chiefs-110
Vikings -110
Colts -105
Pack -110
And that’s not using any exchange/low vig/offshore markets and wherever else VZ places bets
Folks overvaluing Devante¡¯s impact on his first game with a new team¡ Still think Jets the right side.
Folks overvaluing Devante¡¯s impact on his first game with a new team¡ Still think Jets the right side.
Like the picks VZ except Colts. Just curious on your play in that game. I'm gonna guess it's a fade of McDaniel but won't put words in your mouth. No JT, Buckner and probably no Pittman. Downgrade at QB going back to Richardson. I think Achane has a huge game and Huntley has had time to learn playbook better. Colts offensive line still is a solid unit though. Good luck tomorrow man!
Like the picks VZ except Colts. Just curious on your play in that game. I'm gonna guess it's a fade of McDaniel but won't put words in your mouth. No JT, Buckner and probably no Pittman. Downgrade at QB going back to Richardson. I think Achane has a huge game and Huntley has had time to learn playbook better. Colts offensive line still is a solid unit though. Good luck tomorrow man!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.