Jumping on this early…

Packers ML @ Seattle 14.5 units to win 10 units on Sunday Night Football next week.

May add more depending on line movement. Will have a writeup when I get a chance. 

If you are taking the ml why would you care about line movement?

@the1toturn2

 I meant the general price of the line. If people bet Seattle and the price on the Packers ML or ATS goes down I may add on. 

The price should not matter as all you have to do is in straight up

I loved Packers too but too many Seahawks backers made me back off

Great call 

Thanks, buddy. Not only does the NFC West suck compared to the North but the Packers had a huge rest advantage coming in. Seattle had been traveling for the past month, including NY, while GB was either home or playing Chicago 200 miles away and Detroit 600 miles. The Packers looked twice as fast tonight! 

Nice call brother..

@Wizerguy

@smartbets

 What happened to our Chargers? I thought Tampa was a smoke and mirrors team. It turns out it was the Chargers. Incredible that they canĄ¯t find one serviceable running back off the practice squad garbage heap. And how are they 3 point favorites against a healthy Denver team looking for revenge? 

Baker Mayfield is wildly underrated.

He is a tough, SOB. ThatĄ¯s for sure. I think that team is also very talented on offense. They have stud running back and a stud receiver. Who knows, by the time the playoffs roll around they might be healthier than the Lions, who are falling apart. Dan Campbell must come out of the Shanahan coaching school the way he is running his players into the ground. Not every game has to be played like the SB. 

Up until a few weeks ago it looks like Lions were a lock to get out of the NFC. Not so much anymore tbh. Still favorite but theyĄ¯ve absorbed a lot of injuries as of late and Campbell is like Thibs in the NBA, I agree, heĄ¯s running these guys into the ground. 

Tampa Bay is a sleeper NFC pick. Worth a sprinkle.

Green Bay is dangerous as well.

Lions, who peaked too early, and Chiefs will be good fades at some point in the playoffs. And you are right about the Bays. Both capable of getting to the NFC title game. Though I think GB has the better shot. 

@begginerboy

 Whats your take on the Eagles....Think it's them or Packers....Lions have too many

Injuries on their defense to go to the SB...

And AFC...Leaning Bills or Ravens....

I agree. Eagles are bullies but the team chemistry sucks. They also have two head coaches. Fangio runs the defense and that clown is in charge of the offense. It can work, but itĄ¯s not ideal. The Packers are less talented but a more together team, capable of beating an. In the AFC, the Bills are peaking at the right time! We will find out about the Ravens next week. If they thump the Steelers like they should, and take that division like a boss, then we will know. 

@begginerboy

 I Think Ravens/Steelers is going to be a tight game ....20-17 type of game...

So i don't know who in the AFC has the edge....jmho...

@begginerboy

 Btw Like The Falcons -5.5 on MNF.....Raiders seem to be tanking....

Yup. They need a QB in the draft. I already have the Falcons in a parlay so IĄ¯m not adding on. But I like them tomorrow night. 

I donĄ¯t think so. If Watt doesnĄ¯t play, it will be a long day.  

This was my only play this week. Thanks for the post; let's enjoy the extra Christmas money BB!

Also, I share your view that Chicago is live tonight. Like you said, it's one of those games where you can throw out the stats (although UNDERMYSAC'S insights on Chicago's trash staff is duly noted!). If I were to bet this game, I would play Chicago ML small.

That said, it's a massive opportunity for O'Connell and Darnold to officially shed the "paper tiger" perception. An emphatic win not only ties them with Detroit; it says they are a real contender vying for the NFC's top seed...  &perhaps this is a very special year for the purple indeed.

Glad to hear you bet the game! That was a nice one. IĄ¯ll have a big play this week as well but it will be a teaser. This game tonight doesnĄ¯t excite me only because the Bears may have quit or will quit if they fall behind too much. ThatĄ¯s the risk here. I canĄ¯t see the Vikings making a Ą°statementĄą against losers of 7 straight, unless they are sadistic:) So the real danger is Chicago throwing in the towel for whatever reason. IĄ¯m willing to bet a unit to find out, but no more than that.