I have followed and watched this program for over a year on ESPN 2. It is a great source of information for bettors. The experts offer a treasure trove of information along with their analysis and Best Bets. It is entertaining and their games information is right on. Erin Dolan on the show has been really hot currently has a 9 game win streak on her best bets, most of the others are also very good. ESPN Bets first show will be on this Friday ESPN 2 at 6pm ET. Check it out, information can be a real key to winning.
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I have followed and watched this program for over a year on ESPN 2. It is a great source of information for bettors. The experts offer a treasure trove of information along with their analysis and Best Bets. It is entertaining and their games information is right on. Erin Dolan on the show has been really hot currently has a 9 game win streak on her best bets, most of the others are also very good. ESPN Bets first show will be on this Friday ESPN 2 at 6pm ET. Check it out, information can be a real key to winning.
I thought about keeping track of each one of their records over a season as I can¡¯t seem to find it anywhere. I don¡¯t believe one of them comes out with a winning record at the end of a sports season. It¡¯s possible that they are coincidentally picking losers when I happen to see the show on TV, but that¡¯s all it ever seems to be when I do watch. Great fade material.
1
I thought about keeping track of each one of their records over a season as I can¡¯t seem to find it anywhere. I don¡¯t believe one of them comes out with a winning record at the end of a sports season. It¡¯s possible that they are coincidentally picking losers when I happen to see the show on TV, but that¡¯s all it ever seems to be when I do watch. Great fade material.
I thought about keeping track of each one of their records over a season as I can¡¯t seem to find it anywhere. I don¡¯t believe one of them comes out with a winning record at the end of a sports season. It¡¯s possible that they are coincidentally picking losers when I happen to see the show on TV, but that¡¯s all it ever seems to be when I do watch. Great fade material.
0% chance. Literally 0.
And the juice they lay is incredible. Nobody could win laying -130 on each side of some dumb prop over who is going to pick their nose first.
This is an entertainment show. It is an insult to all of you hardworking sports bettors out there (on covers, probably zero) who take this seriously. I guarantee there is a big correlation between watchers of this train wreck and followers of the pick girls on instagram.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win:
I thought about keeping track of each one of their records over a season as I can¡¯t seem to find it anywhere. I don¡¯t believe one of them comes out with a winning record at the end of a sports season. It¡¯s possible that they are coincidentally picking losers when I happen to see the show on TV, but that¡¯s all it ever seems to be when I do watch. Great fade material.
0% chance. Literally 0.
And the juice they lay is incredible. Nobody could win laying -130 on each side of some dumb prop over who is going to pick their nose first.
This is an entertainment show. It is an insult to all of you hardworking sports bettors out there (on covers, probably zero) who take this seriously. I guarantee there is a big correlation between watchers of this train wreck and followers of the pick girls on instagram.
Anyone who has watched this show for a while and actually wagered what they wagered is down huge. I literally can¡¯t believe a thread like this was posted.
2
Anyone who has watched this show for a while and actually wagered what they wagered is down huge. I literally can¡¯t believe a thread like this was posted.
I watch this show faithfully. Nobody has to tail or fade any handicapper on Daily Wager, Team Matchbook or Covers. I seldom do. I watch for entertainment (they are all congenial) and some interesting factoids.
As far as the DW handicappers being a bunch of losers, STFU you damn lying ignoramuses. Stanford Steve has had three streaks of 10+ Best Bet Winners, Joe Fortenbaugh has had one, and the departed Doug Kezirian had a 9-game streak. They do keep track of net units, whether laying -135 or occasionally hitting at +200 or more. They do NOT keep track of units risked.
Their overall records probably all stink because the show highlights so many games. If I had to pick 7 NFL games weekly for some contest, I'd be lucky to break 52% on a good year.
2
I watch this show faithfully. Nobody has to tail or fade any handicapper on Daily Wager, Team Matchbook or Covers. I seldom do. I watch for entertainment (they are all congenial) and some interesting factoids.
As far as the DW handicappers being a bunch of losers, STFU you damn lying ignoramuses. Stanford Steve has had three streaks of 10+ Best Bet Winners, Joe Fortenbaugh has had one, and the departed Doug Kezirian had a 9-game streak. They do keep track of net units, whether laying -135 or occasionally hitting at +200 or more. They do NOT keep track of units risked.
Their overall records probably all stink because the show highlights so many games. If I had to pick 7 NFL games weekly for some contest, I'd be lucky to break 52% on a good year.
I watch this show faithfully. Nobody has to tail or fade any handicapper on Daily Wager, Team Matchbook or Covers. I seldom do. I watch for entertainment (they are all congenial) and some interesting factoids. As far as the DW handicappers being a bunch of losers, STFU you damn lying ignoramuses. Stanford Steve has had three streaks of 10+ Best Bet Winners, Joe Fortenbaugh has had one, and the departed Doug Kezirian had a 9-game streak. They do keep track of net units, whether laying -135 or occasionally hitting at +200 or more. They do NOT keep track of units risked. Their overall records probably all stink because the show highlights so many games. If I had to pick 7 NFL games weekly for some contest, I'd be lucky to break 52% on a good year.
Whoa! We found a fan.
Fair enough.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
I watch this show faithfully. Nobody has to tail or fade any handicapper on Daily Wager, Team Matchbook or Covers. I seldom do. I watch for entertainment (they are all congenial) and some interesting factoids. As far as the DW handicappers being a bunch of losers, STFU you damn lying ignoramuses. Stanford Steve has had three streaks of 10+ Best Bet Winners, Joe Fortenbaugh has had one, and the departed Doug Kezirian had a 9-game streak. They do keep track of net units, whether laying -135 or occasionally hitting at +200 or more. They do NOT keep track of units risked. Their overall records probably all stink because the show highlights so many games. If I had to pick 7 NFL games weekly for some contest, I'd be lucky to break 52% on a good year.
I have NO idea how the new show will differ. I dislike the idea of them actually being associated with a sportsbook that has branches in 16 states (not including CA, dadgummit).
If anything seems suspicious (such as their winning percentages plummeting) it's easy enough to fade unethical handicappers.
0
I have NO idea how the new show will differ. I dislike the idea of them actually being associated with a sportsbook that has branches in 16 states (not including CA, dadgummit).
If anything seems suspicious (such as their winning percentages plummeting) it's easy enough to fade unethical handicappers.
I have NO idea how the new show will differ. I dislike the idea of them actually being associated with a sportsbook that has branches in 16 states (not including CA, dadgummit). If anything seems suspicious (such as their winning percentages plummeting) it's easy enough to fade unethical handicappers.
In related news, they moved their show from Las Vegas to Bristol Ct, the hot bed of Gambling
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
I have NO idea how the new show will differ. I dislike the idea of them actually being associated with a sportsbook that has branches in 16 states (not including CA, dadgummit). If anything seems suspicious (such as their winning percentages plummeting) it's easy enough to fade unethical handicappers.
In related news, they moved their show from Las Vegas to Bristol Ct, the hot bed of Gambling
So you had to track these numbers yourself right? Am I correct in saying that the records of these people are not available anywhere publicly? If they are showing any kind of long term record on the show, could you tell me which episode?
0
@TJZags598
So you had to track these numbers yourself right? Am I correct in saying that the records of these people are not available anywhere publicly? If they are showing any kind of long term record on the show, could you tell me which episode?
[Quote: Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win]@TJZags598 So you had to track these numbers yourself right? Am I correct in saying that the records of these people are not available anywhere publicly? If they are showing any kind of long term record on the show, could you tell me which episode?[/Quote
They don't post them publicly that i have found.
I track them personally. Especially Erin Dolan.
1
[Quote: Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win]@TJZags598 So you had to track these numbers yourself right? Am I correct in saying that the records of these people are not available anywhere publicly? If they are showing any kind of long term record on the show, could you tell me which episode?[/Quote
Could you post some more of the stats? How are the others doing over their last 100?
If I had to guess I would have said that the ladies had a better record than the guys and that Tyler was easily the worst of the 4. I swear every time I see the show he¡¯s picking another loser.
I also don¡¯t ever remember them talking about unit sizes but I couldn¡¯t be wrong.
0
@TJZags598
Could you post some more of the stats? How are the others doing over their last 100?
If I had to guess I would have said that the ladies had a better record than the guys and that Tyler was easily the worst of the 4. I swear every time I see the show he¡¯s picking another loser.
I also don¡¯t ever remember them talking about unit sizes but I couldn¡¯t be wrong.
@TJZags598 Could you post some more of the stats? How are the others doing over their last 100? If I had to guess I would have said that the ladies had a better record than the guys and that Tyler was easily the worst of the 4. I swear every time I see the show he¡¯s picking another loser. I also don¡¯t ever remember them talking about unit sizes but I couldn¡¯t be wrong.
You are correct:
The only ones worth following are Erin Dolan, and to a lesser extent, Anita Marks.
I wonder if they make their own picks?
Its TV afterall.
0
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win:
@TJZags598 Could you post some more of the stats? How are the others doing over their last 100? If I had to guess I would have said that the ladies had a better record than the guys and that Tyler was easily the worst of the 4. I swear every time I see the show he¡¯s picking another loser. I also don¡¯t ever remember them talking about unit sizes but I couldn¡¯t be wrong.
You are correct:
The only ones worth following are Erin Dolan, and to a lesser extent, Anita Marks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.