Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!!
I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team.
0
Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!!
I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team.
Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!! I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team.
Money talks, Fubah. NFL should be glad to expand more football games, as huge revenue keeps pouring in from both regular season and postseason. Now, the NCAAF has followed through with the 12 teams playoffs premiere.
Streaming companies, such as Amazon Prime, Peacock and lately Netflix have hopped in the NFL bandwagon for the big bucks. Paramount+ is also streaming CBS NFL games.
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!! I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team.
Money talks, Fubah. NFL should be glad to expand more football games, as huge revenue keeps pouring in from both regular season and postseason. Now, the NCAAF has followed through with the 12 teams playoffs premiere.
Streaming companies, such as Amazon Prime, Peacock and lately Netflix have hopped in the NFL bandwagon for the big bucks. Paramount+ is also streaming CBS NFL games.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!! I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team.
Money talks, Fubah. NFL should be glad to expand more football games, as huge revenue keeps pouring in from both regular season and postseason. Now, the NCAAF has followed through with the 12 teams playoffs premiere. Streaming companies, such as Amazon Prime, Peacock and lately Netflix have hopped in the NFL bandwagon for the big bucks. Paramount+ is also streaming CBS NFL games.
@Europa
Indeed. Money, money, money. Everyone is trying to chase money!
....um....including moi. LOL
Not really sure why though. I'm all set in my retirement. I guess I could use a new vehicle though. I could buy it cash now but that would be using my own money.....LOL much rather use the " books' " money
Anyway, successful handicapping is a constant challenge, and I love the challenge!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!! I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team.
Money talks, Fubah. NFL should be glad to expand more football games, as huge revenue keeps pouring in from both regular season and postseason. Now, the NCAAF has followed through with the 12 teams playoffs premiere. Streaming companies, such as Amazon Prime, Peacock and lately Netflix have hopped in the NFL bandwagon for the big bucks. Paramount+ is also streaming CBS NFL games.
@Europa
Indeed. Money, money, money. Everyone is trying to chase money!
....um....including moi. LOL
Not really sure why though. I'm all set in my retirement. I guess I could use a new vehicle though. I could buy it cash now but that would be using my own money.....LOL much rather use the " books' " money
Anyway, successful handicapping is a constant challenge, and I love the challenge!
Ranking the 2025 Draft Derby "race for the bottom":
Which teams are going to "accidentally" flail & stumble with low percentage plays, untimely blitzes, foolish 4th down gambles, dropped passes, fumbles, and missed tackles?
Giants still have the least stressful path to "accidentally" lose their 3 remaining games to claim the first draft pick!
**Interesting note: The awful Raiders face the awful Jags. But unfortunately only one of them can gain the benefit of a LOSS!LOL
2 - 12 NYG 2 - 12 Raiders
3 - 11 Carolina 3 - 11 Jags 3 - 11 Tom Brady's old team 3 - 11 Charlie Browns 3 - 11 Titans
It's the way the NFL rewards failure. Losing can be beneficial.
And we as handicappers need to keep this in mind . . .
1
[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]
Loss is MORE!
Ranking the 2025 Draft Derby "race for the bottom":
Which teams are going to "accidentally" flail & stumble with low percentage plays, untimely blitzes, foolish 4th down gambles, dropped passes, fumbles, and missed tackles?
Giants still have the least stressful path to "accidentally" lose their 3 remaining games to claim the first draft pick!
**Interesting note: The awful Raiders face the awful Jags. But unfortunately only one of them can gain the benefit of a LOSS!LOL
2 - 12 NYG 2 - 12 Raiders
3 - 11 Carolina 3 - 11 Jags 3 - 11 Tom Brady's old team 3 - 11 Charlie Browns 3 - 11 Titans
It's the way the NFL rewards failure. Losing can be beneficial.
And we as handicappers need to keep this in mind . . .
When I look at upcoming games where one team holds MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, over the past 5 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results:
Teams I circled:
Week 11: 7 - 1 su Week 12: 6 - 3 su Week 13: 10 - 1 su Week 14: 7 - 1 su Week 15: 9 - 1 su >>>>> = 39 - 7 su ( 26 - 17 - 2 ats )
I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 41 - 13 in this 5 week time frame, whereby 6 of my 13 losses were "in-game hedge bets" (ie, not handicapped) and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit SU at an 87% rate (41 - 6) utilizing those stats! ... This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 8 teams "circled" on my sheets which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent. I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds! But I do consider significant injuries which may add or remove teams from the list. So far in my capping this week, with much still left to analyze, I have Bills, Bengals, Lions for SU wins....but those can change due to injury status...esp the Lions
1
When I look at upcoming games where one team holds MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, over the past 5 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results:
Teams I circled:
Week 11: 7 - 1 su Week 12: 6 - 3 su Week 13: 10 - 1 su Week 14: 7 - 1 su Week 15: 9 - 1 su >>>>> = 39 - 7 su ( 26 - 17 - 2 ats )
I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 41 - 13 in this 5 week time frame, whereby 6 of my 13 losses were "in-game hedge bets" (ie, not handicapped) and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit SU at an 87% rate (41 - 6) utilizing those stats! ... This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 8 teams "circled" on my sheets which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent. I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds! But I do consider significant injuries which may add or remove teams from the list. So far in my capping this week, with much still left to analyze, I have Bills, Bengals, Lions for SU wins....but those can change due to injury status...esp the Lions
When I look at upcoming games where one team holds MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, over the past 5 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results: Teams I circled: Week 11: 7 - 1 suWeek 12: 6 - 3 suWeek 13: 10 - 1 suWeek 14: 7 - 1 su Week 15: 9 - 1 su >>>>> = 39 - 7 su ( 26 - 17 - 2 ats ) I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 41 - 13 in this 5 week time frame, whereby 6 of my 13 losses were "in-game hedge bets" (ie, not handicapped) and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit SU at an 87% rate (41 - 6) utilizing those stats! ... This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 8 teams "circled" on my sheets which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent. I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds! But I do consider significant injuries which may add or remove teams from the list. So far in my capping this week, with much still left to analyze, I have Bills, Bengals, Lions for SU wins....but those can change due to injury status...esp the Lions
updates ?
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
When I look at upcoming games where one team holds MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, over the past 5 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results: Teams I circled: Week 11: 7 - 1 suWeek 12: 6 - 3 suWeek 13: 10 - 1 suWeek 14: 7 - 1 su Week 15: 9 - 1 su >>>>> = 39 - 7 su ( 26 - 17 - 2 ats ) I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 41 - 13 in this 5 week time frame, whereby 6 of my 13 losses were "in-game hedge bets" (ie, not handicapped) and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit SU at an 87% rate (41 - 6) utilizing those stats! ... This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 8 teams "circled" on my sheets which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent. I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds! But I do consider significant injuries which may add or remove teams from the list. So far in my capping this week, with much still left to analyze, I have Bills, Bengals, Lions for SU wins....but those can change due to injury status...esp the Lions
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: When I look at upcoming games where one team holds MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, over the past 5 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results: Teams I circled: Week 11: 7 - 1 suWeek 12: 6 - 3 suWeek 13: 10 - 1 suWeek 14: 7 - 1 su Week 15: 9 - 1 su >>>>> = 39 - 7 su ( 26 - 17 - 2 ats ) I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 41 - 13 in this 5 week time frame, whereby 6 of my 13 losses were "in-game hedge bets" (ie, not handicapped) and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit SU at an 87% rate (41 - 6) utilizing those stats! ... This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 8 teams "circled" on my sheets which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent. I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds! But I do consider significant injuries which may add or remove teams from the list. So far in my capping this week, with much still left to analyze, I have Bills, Bengals, Lions for SU wins....but those can change due to injury status...esp the Lions
updates ?
Neither of today's games are on my "circled" list.
BoL today with your bets!
They are both in watch & wait mode...
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: When I look at upcoming games where one team holds MASSIVE edges over their significantly weaker opponent, over the past 5 weeks my handicapping sheets revealed these results: Teams I circled: Week 11: 7 - 1 suWeek 12: 6 - 3 suWeek 13: 10 - 1 suWeek 14: 7 - 1 su Week 15: 9 - 1 su >>>>> = 39 - 7 su ( 26 - 17 - 2 ats ) I subsequently used those indicators to make MOST of my su bet selections. My real bets went 41 - 13 in this 5 week time frame, whereby 6 of my 13 losses were "in-game hedge bets" (ie, not handicapped) and one more was for an in-game shot at a nice middle (but barely missed) IOW, my pre-game handicapped selections ultimately hit SU at an 87% rate (41 - 6) utilizing those stats! ... This week it is looking like I'll have as many as 8 teams "circled" on my sheets which hold MASSIVE edges - to win SU - over their significantly weaker opponent. I DO NOT evaluate based on team win/loss record, nor the Vegas odds! But I do consider significant injuries which may add or remove teams from the list. So far in my capping this week, with much still left to analyze, I have Bills, Bengals, Lions for SU wins....but those can change due to injury status...esp the Lions
updates ?
Neither of today's games are on my "circled" list.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!! I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team. Money talks, Fubah. NFL should be glad to expand more football games, as huge revenue keeps pouring in from both regular season and postseason. Now, the NCAAF has followed through with the 12 teams playoffs premiere. Streaming companies, such as Amazon Prime, Peacock and lately Netflix have hopped in the NFL bandwagon for the big bucks. Paramount+ is also streaming CBS NFL games.
For the very first time, Amazon Prime Video will be exclusively streaming an NFL Wild Card game in January, either on 1-11-25 or 1-12-25.
During last season, Peacock reportedly paid NFL $110 million for the sole right to stream the Wild Card game between Miami and Kansas City.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Personally I would like to see the NFL reduce the sched back to 16 games but expand the playoff teams to 8 in each conf - whereby there are no byes, everybody plays each week, seeding by records, in a 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7 format....and while the 4 division winners each conf is assured of being in the playoffs, that doesn't mean home field in round 1.... THE HIGHER SEED ALWAYS GETS HOMEFIELD throughout the playoffs!! I hate seeing a 9 - 7 team get homefield vs a more deserving 11 - 5 team. Money talks, Fubah. NFL should be glad to expand more football games, as huge revenue keeps pouring in from both regular season and postseason. Now, the NCAAF has followed through with the 12 teams playoffs premiere. Streaming companies, such as Amazon Prime, Peacock and lately Netflix have hopped in the NFL bandwagon for the big bucks. Paramount+ is also streaming CBS NFL games.
For the very first time, Amazon Prime Video will be exclusively streaming an NFL Wild Card game in January, either on 1-11-25 or 1-12-25.
During last season, Peacock reportedly paid NFL $110 million for the sole right to stream the Wild Card game between Miami and Kansas City.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.