I have a new system I've created and been tracking since January 27th. Very small sample size however it's doing well so far. Feel free to monitor the results or tail until it gives you a reason not to. I haven't had time to back test these results but plan on doing so once the season is over.
I'm calling this system "Operation Overs". It's a system designed to find value in OVERS. This system is 61-30 overall thus far. Sharing this for the first time so hoping to keep those results rolling. Here are the plays.
-- San Diego/Gonzaga o163.5
-- McNeese St/Houston Christian o156.5
-- Wright St/Oakland o156.5
-- FDU/St. Francis o157.5
-- Portland/San Fran o154.5
-- Pepperdine/Santa Clara o162
-- Tennessee Tech/So. Indiana o147.5
-- Tennessee St/Tennessee Martin o160
-- Utah Tech/UTRGV o154.5
-- Rice/UAB o157.5
-- Cal Bakersfield/CS Northridge o126
-- CCSU/Merrimack o125.5
-- Stonehill/Wagner o123.5
System record: 61-30
Forum record: 0-0
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I have a new system I've created and been tracking since January 27th. Very small sample size however it's doing well so far. Feel free to monitor the results or tail until it gives you a reason not to. I haven't had time to back test these results but plan on doing so once the season is over.
I'm calling this system "Operation Overs". It's a system designed to find value in OVERS. This system is 61-30 overall thus far. Sharing this for the first time so hoping to keep those results rolling. Here are the plays.
There are a number of factors that play into this. Obviously just a fluke. Match-ups, lines, a couple of the higher scoring conferences have games scheduled tonight. Thursday is a typically a bigger slate anyways. I can always share the results from my spreadsheet if you want to see how the plays have been distributed since January 27th. It's a system so there are a ton of factors that contribute.
0
@TJZags598
There are a number of factors that play into this. Obviously just a fluke. Match-ups, lines, a couple of the higher scoring conferences have games scheduled tonight. Thursday is a typically a bigger slate anyways. I can always share the results from my spreadsheet if you want to see how the plays have been distributed since January 27th. It's a system so there are a ton of factors that contribute.
My Concern is the lines are TIGHT this time of year. The teams are what they are, so Vegas knows what the lines should be at this point. All systems should be spitting out fewer and fewer plays.....
You bring up great points, and I am sure your system is well thought out.
Good luck!
0
I want you to hit all 13.
My Concern is the lines are TIGHT this time of year. The teams are what they are, so Vegas knows what the lines should be at this point. All systems should be spitting out fewer and fewer plays.....
You bring up great points, and I am sure your system is well thought out.
What day do the lines get tight in your opinion? They should have been tight long ago if that¡¯s your case. Totals often move by 3-5 points anyways so at what point aren¡¯t they tight?
I disagree with your stance but do appreciate your thoughts. We shall see how they do through the end of the season
0
@TJZags598
What day do the lines get tight in your opinion? They should have been tight long ago if that¡¯s your case. Totals often move by 3-5 points anyways so at what point aren¡¯t they tight?
I disagree with your stance but do appreciate your thoughts. We shall see how they do through the end of the season
You can disagree, that's fine. Any experienced handicapper knows the lines get tighter as the season goes along.....
So you believe that the more history that Vegas has on teams, they don't use it to create better lines?
That the lines in November are just as good as the lines in February?
Vegas has Super computers, the likes you have never seen, with Analytics you have never seen, and you think " your system" can do better than them and their systems??
I do wish you luck.
0
@newbs24
You can disagree, that's fine. Any experienced handicapper knows the lines get tighter as the season goes along.....
So you believe that the more history that Vegas has on teams, they don't use it to create better lines?
That the lines in November are just as good as the lines in February?
Vegas has Super computers, the likes you have never seen, with Analytics you have never seen, and you think " your system" can do better than them and their systems??
I¡¯m not saying I¡¯ll do better than them. When did I say that?
What day do you draw the line during the season and say the Vegas lines are to tight?
Of course the more data they have the better. But that¡¯s more data we have access to also. Plus numbers move right? There¡¯s a ton of value out there with 360 teams in D1 basketball whether it¡¯s November of February.
0
@TJZags598
I¡¯m not saying I¡¯ll do better than them. When did I say that?
What day do you draw the line during the season and say the Vegas lines are to tight?
Of course the more data they have the better. But that¡¯s more data we have access to also. Plus numbers move right? There¡¯s a ton of value out there with 360 teams in D1 basketball whether it¡¯s November of February.
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.