Pelicans -1 huge
the lakers rather play Okc and not Denver .lakers will win tomorrow
@jdubb2584
@Brooklyncapper is right.
if LAL win tonight, they are in the playoffs as the #7 seed, if they lose, they will have to play an extra game against the winner of the 9 v 10 game.
@jdubb2584
@Brooklyncapper is right.
if LAL win tonight, they are in the playoffs as the #7 seed, if they lose, they will have to play an extra game against the winner of the 9 v 10 game.
@SkySky
No s*** Sherlock.were you born yesterday?do you think lakers want to play Denver or Okc first round?if Lakers win today they get Denver who owns lakers.yes I know they still have to beat the winner or golden st/Sacramento which I think they will
@SkySky
No s*** Sherlock.were you born yesterday?do you think lakers want to play Denver or Okc first round?if Lakers win today they get Denver who owns lakers.yes I know they still have to beat the winner or golden st/Sacramento which I think they will
@jdubb2584
The goal is to make playoffs. If they¡¯re deciding to lose today and then they lose tomorrow which is def a possibility, then what? You make zero sense and can tell you¡¯ve never even played a game of AAU ball. You just a sport watcher.
@jdubb2584
The goal is to make playoffs. If they¡¯re deciding to lose today and then they lose tomorrow which is def a possibility, then what? You make zero sense and can tell you¡¯ve never even played a game of AAU ball. You just a sport watcher.
@UnrankedChamp
looks like @jdubb2584 idiotic conspicacy theory of the LAL throwiing the game to get a better first round matchup was just that, idiotic
Teams don't play 82 games, to lose a play-in tournament game on purpose and risk their entire season.
@UnrankedChamp
looks like @jdubb2584 idiotic conspicacy theory of the LAL throwiing the game to get a better first round matchup was just that, idiotic
Teams don't play 82 games, to lose a play-in tournament game on purpose and risk their entire season.
@smellieflower
of course I waited until the end of the game. You got to see for 48 minutes, that the Lakers were not intentionally tanking, which was the claim of the OP.
@smellieflower
of course I waited until the end of the game. You got to see for 48 minutes, that the Lakers were not intentionally tanking, which was the claim of the OP.
I'm in the camp that no team is dumb enough to lose a single-elimination game on purpose in order to "get a better matchup" in the actual playoffs.
They'd be risking getting knocked out entirely. If teams are in the play-in, they're going to play to win the #7 seed no matter what cause then you get some breathing room with a 7 game series after that.
I'm in the camp that no team is dumb enough to lose a single-elimination game on purpose in order to "get a better matchup" in the actual playoffs.
They'd be risking getting knocked out entirely. If teams are in the play-in, they're going to play to win the #7 seed no matter what cause then you get some breathing room with a 7 game series after that.
@UnrankedChamp
What does playing AAU have to do with anything? OP is wrong but now you are bordering on his aptitude level. You never played in the NBA, so I can tell you don't know anything and are just a sport watcher. Society has no common sense these days.
@UnrankedChamp
What does playing AAU have to do with anything? OP is wrong but now you are bordering on his aptitude level. You never played in the NBA, so I can tell you don't know anything and are just a sport watcher. Society has no common sense these days.
@smellieflower
Wow, really ?
if they were tanking the game, they would not have won.
Conspiracy clowns refusing to believe what they just saw. Laughable.
@smellieflower
Wow, really ?
if they were tanking the game, they would not have won.
Conspiracy clowns refusing to believe what they just saw. Laughable.
hahahahahahaha your a joke thats not a Conspiracy.
your a clown refusing to believe what you just saw sure you called them to win but they werent winning that.
im unbias af laugh all you want thats why they only won by 4 when they had a lead of 18 at a point in the game
@SkySky
hahahahahahaha your a joke thats not a Conspiracy.
your a clown refusing to believe what you just saw sure you called them to win but they werent winning that.
im unbias af laugh all you want thats why they only won by 4 when they had a lead of 18 at a point in the game
@SkySky
You and the OP both called the LAL to throw the game. They didn't throw the game, they WON the game, yet you still don't realize you were wrong.
It's over. no conspiracy. you lose.
moving on.
You and the OP both called the LAL to throw the game. They didn't throw the game, they WON the game, yet you still don't realize you were wrong.
It's over. no conspiracy. you lose.
moving on.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.