buck,
Ive seen that discussion about bank adoption and it makes sense due to the cost no question but the issues are these..
First, everything I've seen from XRP and the guys behind it telegraph that they are in this to make a solid, stable platform for banks to transact..and that they are not wanting an unstable environment and that is why they are controlling the float and have a ton in "treasury" coin to keep the float under control. I do not think that they will allow this to skyrocket as that would be bad for their business model...banks are not going to want the headache of massive price differences as that could easily lead to losses if they choose to go this route. I think the guys behind this are against the speculative nature of other coin out there and I read some pieces implying that.
Second, banks do not have to "own" these to transact with them, they can buy and sell when they need as they need to perform a transaction and then be net flat at the end of the transaction...so I dont see a "load up" scenario here, in fact banks are not wanting to sink money into owning a coin, rather they want to quickly and cheaply transact and be done. So I dont think there will be this massive rush into owning XRP by banks. Let me know if you disagree.
My analysis is that the guys behind this want XRP right at a buck...that makes sense and is semi similar to a money market with lower costs and faster transaction speed.
buck,
Ive seen that discussion about bank adoption and it makes sense due to the cost no question but the issues are these..
First, everything I've seen from XRP and the guys behind it telegraph that they are in this to make a solid, stable platform for banks to transact..and that they are not wanting an unstable environment and that is why they are controlling the float and have a ton in "treasury" coin to keep the float under control. I do not think that they will allow this to skyrocket as that would be bad for their business model...banks are not going to want the headache of massive price differences as that could easily lead to losses if they choose to go this route. I think the guys behind this are against the speculative nature of other coin out there and I read some pieces implying that.
Second, banks do not have to "own" these to transact with them, they can buy and sell when they need as they need to perform a transaction and then be net flat at the end of the transaction...so I dont see a "load up" scenario here, in fact banks are not wanting to sink money into owning a coin, rather they want to quickly and cheaply transact and be done. So I dont think there will be this massive rush into owning XRP by banks. Let me know if you disagree.
My analysis is that the guys behind this want XRP right at a buck...that makes sense and is semi similar to a money market with lower costs and faster transaction speed.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.