And their offenses looked stagnant against SEC defenses that were mostly considered average in their league. Alabama brings much better athletes and coaches than Ole Miss and Missou. Think Georgia type athletes which they beat.Is Michigan that much better on offense than OSU and PSU? It didn¡¯t look so in their games during the regular season. I think this is another year when the Big10 gets exposed against the SEC in the big games. Watching Iowa and Whiskey to confirm in the earlier games. If so, I will unload on Alabama.
both Iowa and Wisky might win today. You can¡¯t look at the other games for shit. Too many players out. Tenn qb out and LSU as well and that defense is ass
0
Quote Originally Posted by Martelxo92:
And their offenses looked stagnant against SEC defenses that were mostly considered average in their league. Alabama brings much better athletes and coaches than Ole Miss and Missou. Think Georgia type athletes which they beat.Is Michigan that much better on offense than OSU and PSU? It didn¡¯t look so in their games during the regular season. I think this is another year when the Big10 gets exposed against the SEC in the big games. Watching Iowa and Whiskey to confirm in the earlier games. If so, I will unload on Alabama.
both Iowa and Wisky might win today. You can¡¯t look at the other games for shit. Too many players out. Tenn qb out and LSU as well and that defense is ass
My stupid way of thinking has me at +4790 right now for this season and I¡¯ve won 4 years in a row. I¡¯ve played these games for 38 years. Your comment about stupid thinking shows immaturity and ignorance on your part.
0
@JackSmack
My stupid way of thinking has me at +4790 right now for this season and I¡¯ve won 4 years in a row. I¡¯ve played these games for 38 years. Your comment about stupid thinking shows immaturity and ignorance on your part.
If you have been betting for 38 years you should know better!You are comparing a team playing for the championship vs teams that have various opt outs, portals, motivation so on!
Cmon
0
@Martelxo92
If you have been betting for 38 years you should know better!You are comparing a team playing for the championship vs teams that have various opt outs, portals, motivation so on!
@JackSmack My stupid way of thinking has me at +4790 right now for this season and I¡¯ve won 4 years in a row. I¡¯ve played these games for 38 years. Your comment about stupid thinking shows immaturity and ignorance on your part.
I bet my life u aren¡¯t at 4790 units. we¡¯ll definitely not after unloading on Alabama.
Same conference, WOW, DID U SEE HOW RUTGERS PLAYED? They in michigans conference Michigan sucks, let¡¯s go unload on Alabama and increase my lifetime u it total to +4990 bullshit monopoly dollars lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by Martelxo92:
@JackSmack My stupid way of thinking has me at +4790 right now for this season and I¡¯ve won 4 years in a row. I¡¯ve played these games for 38 years. Your comment about stupid thinking shows immaturity and ignorance on your part.
I bet my life u aren¡¯t at 4790 units. we¡¯ll definitely not after unloading on Alabama.
Same conference, WOW, DID U SEE HOW RUTGERS PLAYED? They in michigans conference Michigan sucks, let¡¯s go unload on Alabama and increase my lifetime u it total to +4990 bullshit monopoly dollars lol
Honestly, if you don't give bowl games any weight then there is not enough meaningful data for cross-conference games involving top 25 teams. Need both teams to be top 25 team
UM's non-conference slate this year was bowling green, unlv and East Carolina. And they are nowhere near unique in having it so weak...
Here's something:
Alabama and Michigan essentially tied (I would say same about my favourite team in same situation). Alabama beat Georgia. Alabama needed complete miracle play on 4th down to beat Auburn....New Mexico State thrashed Auburn a.week or two before. Does that make NMSU an elite team?
NMSU >>>> Alabama/Auburn and Alabama = Michigan really makes me wonder about a lot of things..
0
Honestly, if you don't give bowl games any weight then there is not enough meaningful data for cross-conference games involving top 25 teams. Need both teams to be top 25 team
UM's non-conference slate this year was bowling green, unlv and East Carolina. And they are nowhere near unique in having it so weak...
Here's something:
Alabama and Michigan essentially tied (I would say same about my favourite team in same situation). Alabama beat Georgia. Alabama needed complete miracle play on 4th down to beat Auburn....New Mexico State thrashed Auburn a.week or two before. Does that make NMSU an elite team?
NMSU >>>> Alabama/Auburn and Alabama = Michigan really makes me wonder about a lot of things..
Honestly, if you don't give bowl games any weight then there is not enough meaningful data for cross-conference games involving top 25 teams. Need both teams to be top 25 team UM's non-conference slate this year was bowling green, unlv and East Carolina. And they are nowhere near unique in having it so weak... Here's something: Alabama and Michigan essentially tied (I would say same about my favourite team in same situation). Alabama beat Georgia. Alabama needed complete miracle play on 4th down to beat Auburn....New Mexico State thrashed Auburn a.week or two before. Does that make NMSU an elite team? NMSU >>>> Alabama/Auburn and Alabama = Michigan really makes me wonder about a lot of things..
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimrockford22:
Honestly, if you don't give bowl games any weight then there is not enough meaningful data for cross-conference games involving top 25 teams. Need both teams to be top 25 team UM's non-conference slate this year was bowling green, unlv and East Carolina. And they are nowhere near unique in having it so weak... Here's something: Alabama and Michigan essentially tied (I would say same about my favourite team in same situation). Alabama beat Georgia. Alabama needed complete miracle play on 4th down to beat Auburn....New Mexico State thrashed Auburn a.week or two before. Does that make NMSU an elite team? NMSU >>>> Alabama/Auburn and Alabama = Michigan really makes me wonder about a lot of things..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.