The committee is in Dallas and there is a lot of SMU money to influence them

Lots of back room deals being done by SMU boosters to ensure SMU is in the playoffs 

If SMU gets in with their 75 ranked SOS and  not beating a single ranked team then the committee is basically telling you wins is graded as higher meaning than any other factors . I think it should be 10. Indiana 11 Alabama 12. Clemson .

On a side note I wish i could use bet365 in Vegas they are offering 100-1 on Arizona state to win it all while my sportsbook only giving 40-1 . They will undoubtedly be a high ranked seed with some even projecting first round bye 

@buffer

Hope you're right lol!

And who has Indiana beaten that makes them deserving? 

You're 100% right, but they will be in 

What evidence do you have of this?

@the1toturn2

 None. Its buffer. 

dumb

They meet in Grapevine anyway - never met in Dallas

Mrs Peacock in Living room with a candle stick

Did someone in the Grapevine hotel bathroom tell you this?

Expand and show some evidence of your comment or is it (your comment, just opinion).  

Clearly you have never met buffer. Opinion is always unique

@AJ86

 So true, a buffering.

But, if you've read about the way SMU got into the ACC with their big money push, don't discount them getting in.

classic buffer

@TheBlackKnight

 Buffer has a LONG history of posting BS stories he knows for a fact are BS. It gets him off. Literally 

@wmi799

 Buffer is the Paul Finebaum of Covers. We should be grateful

Thanks for the update on the poster.  

committee already stated teams that were in but lost their conf championship wouldnt get demoted for losing the extra game.

smu was in prior to yesterday, they will remain in and should be team #12.  

iu played an easy schedule too and crushed just about everyone with their only loss to tOSU.  they will be in.

bama lost to vandy and oklahoma.  shameful. 

smooooo

Saban talking SOS right now lol...you lost 3 regular season games! you're out!

saban is just sad...give it a rest dood.

I think vast majority of neutral observors think SMU should be in

SMU