I was in a hurry trying to order food, I got confused with another first qtr but Indy first qtr is the recommendation
I¡¯m sure it¡¯ll be + 3
I haven¡¯t even bet it yet but I¡¯m about to, I¡¯m going to crush a southern book with this one & move the juice significantly so my friends have to pay higher juice, I normally give them all my bets so they can get them in for best lines, they are small players mostly, they pranked me bad this week though & even though I found it funny I have to repay them, I¡¯m gonna see if I move the juice sky high, about the hit the big boy button
.
1
Quote Originally Posted by thejhnny:
@WahooS wow my book is offering +3.5!
I was in a hurry trying to order food, I got confused with another first qtr but Indy first qtr is the recommendation
I¡¯m sure it¡¯ll be + 3
I haven¡¯t even bet it yet but I¡¯m about to, I¡¯m going to crush a southern book with this one & move the juice significantly so my friends have to pay higher juice, I normally give them all my bets so they can get them in for best lines, they are small players mostly, they pranked me bad this week though & even though I found it funny I have to repay them, I¡¯m gonna see if I move the juice sky high, about the hit the big boy button
That would not shock me either. That said, barring Riley Leonard turning into a turnover machine similar to the NIU game, IU winning this game outright is highly unlikely for several reasons.
The first reason is that the only position advantages I see IU having are @ QB and WR. And that is somewhat negated by ND¡¯s excellent pass defense and secondary. Plus the weather in South Bend will not be optimal for passing for either team. Much more difficult to catch passes in 20 degree weather with wind gusts than we are used to seeing IU do so effectively earlier this season.
I am on board with the Hoo Train recommendation on IU +3 1Q. But after that Cig is somewhat limited by playing against a Notre Dame team with substantially more talent at nearly every other position and a tremendous depth advantage. IU¡¯s depth problem appeared to be exposed in the Ohio State game. Imo, as the game moves forward Friday night, Notre Dame will be able to physically wear IU down, especially in the run game.
0
@Boisestateand8
That would not shock me either. That said, barring Riley Leonard turning into a turnover machine similar to the NIU game, IU winning this game outright is highly unlikely for several reasons.
The first reason is that the only position advantages I see IU having are @ QB and WR. And that is somewhat negated by ND¡¯s excellent pass defense and secondary. Plus the weather in South Bend will not be optimal for passing for either team. Much more difficult to catch passes in 20 degree weather with wind gusts than we are used to seeing IU do so effectively earlier this season.
I am on board with the Hoo Train recommendation on IU +3 1Q. But after that Cig is somewhat limited by playing against a Notre Dame team with substantially more talent at nearly every other position and a tremendous depth advantage. IU¡¯s depth problem appeared to be exposed in the Ohio State game. Imo, as the game moves forward Friday night, Notre Dame will be able to physically wear IU down, especially in the run game.
@Boisestateand8 That would not shock me either. That said, barring Riley Leonard turning into a turnover machine similar to the NIU game, IU winning this game outright is highly unlikely for several reasons. The first reason is that the only position advantages I see IU having are @ QB and WR. And that is somewhat negated by ND¡¯s excellent pass defense and secondary. Plus the weather in South Bend will not be optimal for passing for either team. Much more difficult to catch passes in 20 degree weather with wind gusts than we are used to seeing IU do so effectively earlier this season. I am on board with the Hoo Train recommendation on IU +3 1Q. But after that Cig is somewhat limited by playing against a Notre Dame team with substantially more talent at nearly every other position and a tremendous depth advantage. IU¡¯s depth problem appeared to be exposed in the Ohio State game. Imo, as the game moves forward Friday night, Notre Dame will be able to physically wear IU down, especially in the run game.
this is a great post & I tend to agree, I do think Hoosiers can short pass & run on Dame, if Riley throws on them then they¡¯ll get raced most likely, Indy needs an ugly weather rock fight with a 21-20 type score, hard to imagine Hoosiers putting up 30 on that defense in that cold weather
I do expect them to pee on the grass first, Cig can dial up an opening drive, their mindset is incredible as well, Hoosiers first quarter alllllllllll night long
Dame should win this game though, if freeman allows an agressive offensive plan then they¡¯ll have advantages
this is a big game for freeman, he has the better team but I¡¯ve seen him shrink before, Cignetti is a beast, he¡¯s got James Maddy 2.0 in the first ever playoff with fkn 5 good players & a bunch of kids who are coached up
Lets go Hoosiers
.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Bateman15:
@Boisestateand8 That would not shock me either. That said, barring Riley Leonard turning into a turnover machine similar to the NIU game, IU winning this game outright is highly unlikely for several reasons. The first reason is that the only position advantages I see IU having are @ QB and WR. And that is somewhat negated by ND¡¯s excellent pass defense and secondary. Plus the weather in South Bend will not be optimal for passing for either team. Much more difficult to catch passes in 20 degree weather with wind gusts than we are used to seeing IU do so effectively earlier this season. I am on board with the Hoo Train recommendation on IU +3 1Q. But after that Cig is somewhat limited by playing against a Notre Dame team with substantially more talent at nearly every other position and a tremendous depth advantage. IU¡¯s depth problem appeared to be exposed in the Ohio State game. Imo, as the game moves forward Friday night, Notre Dame will be able to physically wear IU down, especially in the run game.
this is a great post & I tend to agree, I do think Hoosiers can short pass & run on Dame, if Riley throws on them then they¡¯ll get raced most likely, Indy needs an ugly weather rock fight with a 21-20 type score, hard to imagine Hoosiers putting up 30 on that defense in that cold weather
I do expect them to pee on the grass first, Cig can dial up an opening drive, their mindset is incredible as well, Hoosiers first quarter alllllllllll night long
Dame should win this game though, if freeman allows an agressive offensive plan then they¡¯ll have advantages
this is a big game for freeman, he has the better team but I¡¯ve seen him shrink before, Cignetti is a beast, he¡¯s got James Maddy 2.0 in the first ever playoff with fkn 5 good players & a bunch of kids who are coached up
Woulda been nice for him to score....if they woulda gave him the ball more he would have dominanted.....he had 14/100 ......the other 4 non QB runners had 18/52
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bixby17:
@TRAIN69 There we go! Great call!
I'll take it
Woulda been nice for him to score....if they woulda gave him the ball more he would have dominanted.....he had 14/100 ......the other 4 non QB runners had 18/52
Agreed. I just looked. They kept feeding Knight and before that last run he was 10 rushes for 18 yards. I understand the change of pace but he literally was not doing a thing
0
@TRAIN69
Agreed. I just looked. They kept feeding Knight and before that last run he was 10 rushes for 18 yards. I understand the change of pace but he literally was not doing a thing
Let's be serious now. Notre Dame didn't exactly play a bunch of offensive dynamos. Their defensive numbers are inflated by horrible offenses, particularly their passing numbers.Indiana is by far the best offense they will have seen.
1
@Bateman15
Let's be serious now. Notre Dame didn't exactly play a bunch of offensive dynamos. Their defensive numbers are inflated by horrible offenses, particularly their passing numbers.Indiana is by far the best offense they will have seen.
Updated Recommendations 1. Texas Tech ML + 110 (we may pull without Morton, really will depend on who is playing for Arkansas) 2. Indiana + points first quarter (waiting for this one book to bet this with so have to wait, train & I both love that we can be tied & win this bet) 3. UNLV ML first half (new QB for Cal may take a bit to get going) lean game - 3 for Rebs if you¡¯re bored out there
1-0 start with wild unlv 1h good luck rest the way
goldfinger 1964
0
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
Updated Recommendations 1. Texas Tech ML + 110 (we may pull without Morton, really will depend on who is playing for Arkansas) 2. Indiana + points first quarter (waiting for this one book to bet this with so have to wait, train & I both love that we can be tied & win this bet) 3. UNLV ML first half (new QB for Cal may take a bit to get going) lean game - 3 for Rebs if you¡¯re bored out there
1-0 start with wild unlv 1h good luck rest the way
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
