Moneyline Winners

So I¡¯ve gambled quite a bit and haven¡¯t won too much nor lost too much. There was a time I won a good amount and lost it back and didn¡¯t have disciple but as I¡¯ve grown I¡¯ve learned to play a little slower and really wait for those good spots on MONEYLINE winners. I¡¯m talking -300 to -1000 typically shooting for -500 odds.

Ive recently just picked 18 straight in a row. Took my bankroll from 300 to 3000 in 5 days. Cashed out and am starting at 300 again. 

This strategy really is all about just dodging the upset and although I have lost repeatedly over and over before I always believed if I just keep learning discipline and better angles along the way I would in fact get better. With this strategy you go all in every play and just rollover. It¡¯s essentially like a parlay but you get to wait for the good spots instead of forcing it all into one day. 

A lot of people swear against the big moneyline  favorites but my gut tells me different. 

GL

@ACEasterling

 Let me tell you the problem with this.  It is the spread in price between a big favorite and a big dog.  It is way higher than an even type of game.

If you are laying -10-1, the other side is like +6-1.  That is a huge spread - and assuming the midpoint is the correct line over the long haul - you are paying an enormous amount of juice to bet this ML favorite than say a game that is -110 on both sides.

It is not that big ML favorites are inherently a bad bet - it is that you will get chewed up with juice that represents like a 25% house hold over the long haul.

This is the sole reason to stay away from these types of big ML favorites (or dogs).

GL